Alternative Pneumocystis Pneumonia Prophylaxis in Solid Organ Transplants

Kevin D. He,Linh Nguyen,Maxwell Norris,Gregory Malat,Stephanie Witek,Chelsea Sammons,Abigail Forte,Tamara Claridge,Jennifer Trofe Clark,Emily Blumberg
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.14410
2024-11-29
Transplant Infectious Disease
Abstract:At our institution, 34.9% of solid organ transplant recipients over a 2‐year period received alternative Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia prophylaxis due to trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole (TMP‐SMX) allergies and intolerances. Those that restarted TMP‐SMX tolerated it well (85.7%). Medical interventions and established protocols can limit the use of alternative prophylaxis and reduce the risk of breakthrough infections, such as toxoplasmosis and nocardiosis. Background Despite limited data supporting use in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, atovaquone and dapsone are often used as alternatives to trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole (TMP‐SMX) for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) prophylaxis. Methods This single‐center, retrospective cohort study describes a multi‐organ program's experience with alternative PJP prophylaxis. Adult SOT recipients transplanted November 13, 2020 to November 13, 2022 who received non‐TMP‐SMX PJP prophylaxis and had > 1 year follow‐up were included. Results Among 953 SOTs performed, 333 (34.9%) recipients received alternative PJP prophylaxis (319 [95.8%] atovaquone and 14 [4.2%] dapsone). Alternative prophylaxis was initiated in 76 (22.8%) recipients without starting TMP‐SMX, mostly due to sulfa allergy (62, 81.6%). In 257 recipients who started TMP‐SMX, common reasons for switching to alternatives were hyperkalemia (105, 40.9%) and leukopenia (77, 30.0%). While 79.8% of recipients had these adverse effects resolve, only 27.3% resumed TMP‐SMX. Tolerance was high after resumption (85.7%). Barriers to accessing alternative prophylaxis included cost (25, 7.5%) and prior authorizations (26, 7.8%). There was one case of severe disseminated toxoplasmosis, one case of Nocardia infection, and no cases of PJP. Conclusion Alternative PJP prophylaxis carries risk of breakthrough infection and barriers to initiation. Since most recovered from adverse effects of TMP‐SMX and tolerated resumption, providers should re‐trial TMP‐SMX when feasible.
immunology,infectious diseases,transplantation
What problem does this paper attempt to address?