Environment-economic Comparison of Potential Alternative Fuel Heavy-Duty Trucks in China

Xizhao Zhang,Zhenhong Lin,Han Hao,Xu Hao,Zhichao Wang,Shunxi Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2024.104206
2024-01-01
Abstract:Heavy-duty trucks, as important players in pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, need to undertake critical responsibility in road freight. By estimating the well-to-wheel emissions and total cost of ownership for internal combustion engine heavy-duty trucks, this study proposes the model of carbon-abatement benefit to conducting an environment-economic comparison of traditional diesel and potential alternative fuel. The results show that liquefied natural gas has better economic performance, with a cost 14.9% lower than diesel, and biodiesel reduces greenhouse gas emissions by more than 40% compared to diesel. Compared to other alternative fuels, liquefied natural gas has better carbon reduction benefits, with a carbon abatement value of 0.51 CNY/km. By 2040, all alternative fuels have positive carbon abatement values, ranging from 0.26 to 1.28 CNY/km. The progress of replacing diesel by alternative fuels for heavy duty trucks depending on the incentive policies, the clean production of fuels, and the competition from electric trucks.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?