Moldable plastics (polycaprolactone) can be acutely toxic to developing zebrafish and activate nuclear receptors in mammalian cells

Bryan James,Alexander Medvedev,Sergei Makarov,Robert Nelson,Christopher Reddy,Mark Hahn

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-qzzm4

2024-04-12

Abstract:Popularized on social media, hand-moldable plastics are formed by consumers into tools, trinkets, and dental prosthetics. Despite the anticipated dermal and oral contact, manufacturers share little information with consumers about these materials. Inherent to their function, moldable plastics pose a risk of dermal and oral exposure to unknown leachable substances. We analyzed 12 moldable plastics advertised for modeling and dental applications and determined them to be polycaprolactone (PCL) or thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU). The bioactivities of the most popular brands advertised for modeling applications of each type of polymer were evaluated using a zebrafish embryo bioassay. Both products were sold as microplastic-sized resin pellets. While water-borne exposure to the TPU pellets did not affect the targeted developmental endpoints at any concentration tested, the PCL pellets were acutely toxic above 1 pellet/mL. Aqueous leachates of the PCL pellets demonstrated similar toxicity. Methanolic extracts from the PCL pellets were assayed for their bioactivity using the Attagene FACTORIAL platform. Of the 69 measured endpoints, the extracts activated nuclear receptors and transcription factors for xenobiotic metabolism (pregnane X receptor, PXR), lipid metabolism (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma, PPARg), and oxidative stress (nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2, NRF2). By non-targeted high-resolution comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC×GC-HRT), we tentatively identified several compounds in the methanolic extracts, including PCL oligomers, a phenolic antioxidant, and residues of suspected anti-hydrolysis and crosslinking additives. In a follow-up zebrafish embryo bioassay, because of its stated high purity, biomedical grade PCL was tested to mitigate any confounding effects due to chemical additives in the PCL pellets; it elicited comparable acute toxicity. From these orthogonal and complementary experiments, we suggest that the toxicity was due to oligomers and nanoplastics released from the PCL rather than chemical additives. These results challenge the perceived and assumed inertness of plastics and highlight their multiple sources of toxicity.

Chemistry

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper focuses on the safety issues of popular plastic materials on the market, such as polycaprolactone (PCL) and thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU). The study found that these plastics may release toxic substances when they come into contact with human skin and oral cavity, causing acute toxicity to developing zebrafish embryos and activating nuclear receptors in mammalian cells. Through the analysis of various plastic products on the market, researchers identified PCL and TPU and evaluated their bioactivity through zebrafish embryo bioassays.

PCL particles showed toxicity when exposed to water, while TPU particles did not produce any effects at the tested concentrations. Through further experiments, researchers found that the methanol extracts of PCL particles could activate nuclear receptors related to xenobiotic metabolism, lipid metabolism, and oxidative stress. Several possible compounds were identified through high-resolution two-dimensional gas chromatography analysis, including PCL oligomers, phenolic antioxidants, and residues suspected to be anti-hydrolysis and cross-linking additives.

Although some PCL products claim to have biomedical grade and emphasize their purity, studies have shown that even at this level, PCL exhibits similar toxicity. This suggests that the toxicity of the plastic may originate from the nanoparticles or oligomers released by the polymer degradation and not from chemical additives. These results challenge the public's general perception of the harmlessness of plastics and highlight the potential multiple sources of toxicity in plastics.