Abstract:Abstract In this paper we revisit $$D_s \rightarrow f_0(980)$$ D s → f 0 ( 980 ) form factors from the light-cone sum rules based on the $${\bar{q}}q$$ q ¯ q picture of $$f_0(980)$$ f 0 ( 980 ) . The main motivation of this study is the decay width of $$D_s^+ \rightarrow \left[ \pi \pi \right] _{S}^{\textrm{I} = 0} e^+ \nu _e$$ D s + → π π S I = 0 e + ν e measured recently by BESIII collaboration and the $$D_s \rightarrow f_0(980)$$ D s → f 0 ( 980 ) form factor extracted under the resonant model, here the subscript S and superscript $$\textrm{I}=0$$ I = 0 indicate the S-wave isoscalar dipion system. Our result of the differential width of $$D_s^+ \rightarrow f_0(980) (\rightarrow \left[ \pi \pi \right] _{S}^{\textrm{I} = 0}) e^+ \nu _e$$ D s + → f 0 ( 980 ) ( → π π S I = 0 ) e + ν e decay obtained under the narrow width approximation is lower than the data, the result obtained under the resonant Flatté model is consistent with the data, indicating a sizable mixing $$\sim 20^{\circ }$$ ∼ 20 ∘ between $${\bar{s}}s$$ s ¯ s and $${\bar{u}}u+{\bar{d}}d$$ u ¯ u + d ¯ d of $$f_0$$ f 0 . In order to get a model independent prediction, we suggest to calculate $$D_s \rightarrow \left[ \pi \pi \right] ^{\textrm{I} = 0}$$ D s → π π I = 0 form factors with the isoscalar dipion light-cone distribution amplitudes. Our calculation of $$D_s \rightarrow \left[ \pi \pi \right] ^{\textrm{I} = 0}$$ D s → π π I = 0 form factors is carried out at leading twist level due to the finite knowledge of dipion system, the differential width shows a moderate evolution in contrast to that obtained from the narrow width approximation and the Flatté model. Since the $$D_s \rightarrow f_0(980)$$ D s → f 0 ( 980 ) form factors is dominated by the twist three contribution, further measurements on four-body semileptonic charm decays would help us to study the dimeson light-cone distribution amplitudes, especially for the subleading twist one.

D_s → f_0(980) form factors and the D_s^+ → (f_0(980) → )[ ππ] _S^I = 0 e^+ ν _e decay from light-cone sum rules

$$D_s \rightarrow f_0(980)$$ form factors and the $$D_s^+ \rightarrow (f_0(980) \rightarrow )\left[ \pi \pi \right] _{S}^{\textrm{I} = 0} e^+ \nu _e$$ decay from light-cone sum rules

Ds → F0(980) Form Factors and the Ds+ → (f0(980) →) [ππ]si=0 E+ Ve Decay from Light-Cone Sum Rules

$$D_s \rightarrow f_0(980)$$ D s → f 0 ( 980 ) form factors and the $$D_s^+ \rightarrow (f_0(980) \rightarrow )\left[ \pi \pi \right] _{S}^{\textrm{I} = 0} e^+ \nu _e$$ D s + → ( f 0 ( 980 ) → ) π π S I = 0 e + ν e decay from light-cone sum rules

$D_s \to f_0$ form factors and the $D_s^+ \to \left[ ππ\right]_{\rm S} e^+ ν_e$ decay from light-cone sum rules

Whether new data on Ds→f0(980)e+νe can be understood if f0(980) consists of only the conventional qq¯ structure

Whether New Data On D-S -> F(0)(980)E(+) Nu E Can Be Understood If F(0)(980) Consists Of Only The Conventional Q(Q)Over-Bar Structure

$B \to f_0(980)$ form factors and the width effect from light-cone sum rules

B̅_s → f_0(980) form factors and the width effect from light-cone sum rules

form factors and the decay from light-cone sum rules

Whether New Data Onds→f0(980)e+νecan Be Understood If

Investigating $D_s^+ \to π^0 \ell^+ ν_\ell$ decay process within QCD sum rule approach

$$\Bar{b}_s \rightarrow F_0(980)$$ Form Factors and the Width Effect from Light-Cone Sum Rules

$$\\bar{B}_s \\rightarrow f_0(980)$$B¯s→f0(980) form factors and the width effect from light-cone sum rules

A0(980)-Meson Twist-2 Distribution Amplitude Within the QCD Sum Rules and Investigation of D → A0(980)(→ηπ)e+νe

Fe b 20 21 η-meson leading-twist distribution amplitude within QCD sum rule approach and its application to the semi-leptonic decay D + s →

Bs→f0(980)form Factors Andbsdecays Into

The a0(980) and f0(980) in the process D s + → K + K − π +

Roles of $f_{0}(500)$ and $f_{0}(980)$ in the $D_{(s)}^{+}\rightarrowπ^{+}π^{+}π^{-}$ decays

Study of D→a0(980)e+ν

B-S -> F(0)(980) Form Factors and B-S Decays into F(0)(980)