Clinical outcomes of cetuximab‐based treatment for distant metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A real‐world study using Taiwan Head Neck Society registry database

Hsueh‐Ju Lu,Meng‐Che Hsieh,Hung‐Ming Wang,Jason Chia‐Hsun Hsieh,Chia‐Jui Yen,Shang‐Yin Wu,Huai‐Cheng Huang,Hui‐Ching Wang,Pen‐Yuan Chu,Tien‐Hua Chen,Chih‐Yen Chien,Tai‐Lin Huang,Yi‐Fang Chang,Chun‐Hung Hua,Ming‐Yu Lien,Jo‐Pai Chen,Wei‐Chen Lu,Jin‐Ching Lin,Chen‐Chi Wang,Yi‐Chun Liu,Muh‐Hwa Yang,Pei‐Jen Lou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.27681
2024-02-24
Head & Neck
Abstract:Background For R/M HNSCC, the differences in prognosis and treatment options between distant metastasis (DM) and locoregional recurrence, especially in the DM group, remain unclear. Methods From the Taiwan Head Neck Society registry database, patients who were diagnosed with R/M HNSCC and received cetuximab‐based frontline therapy were collected for analysis. Results Among the enrolled patients, 59.3% (491/827) belonged to the DM group. The DM group had less primary site of oral cavity, less betel nut chewing, higher lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, and higher LDH/albumin ratio compared with the non‐DM group. For the patients with primary site of oral cavity and current smokers, DM coexisted with poorer outcomes. In the DM group, EXTREME‐like regimen was more suitable for older patients, those with elevated LDH, and those with higher LDH/albumin ratio than TPExtreme‐like regimen. Conclusion DM coexisted with poorer prognosis in certain groups. LDH‐associated biomarkers may aid treatment options for DM patients.
surgery,otorhinolaryngology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?