Abstract:Graph contrastive learning (GCL) is a promising direction toward alleviating the label dependence, poor generalization and weak robustness of graph neural networks, learning representations with invariance, and discriminability by solving pretasks. The pretasks are mainly built on mutual information estimation, which requires data augmentation to construct positive samples with similar semantics to learn invariant signals and negative samples with dissimilar semantics to empower representation discriminability. However, an appropriate data augmentation configuration depends heavily on lots of empirical trials such as choosing the compositions of data augmentation techniques and the corresponding hyperparameter settings. We propose an augmentation-free GCL method, invariant-discriminative GCL (iGCL), that does not intrinsically require negative samples. iGCL designs the invariant-discriminative loss (ID loss) to learn invariant and discriminative representations. On the one hand, ID loss learns invariant signals by directly minimizing the mean square error (MSE) between the target samples and positive samples in the representation space. On the other hand, ID loss ensures that the representations are discriminative by an orthonormal constraint forcing the different dimensions of representations to be independent of each other. This prevents representations from collapsing to a point or subspace. Our theoretical analysis explains the effectiveness of ID loss from the perspectives of the redundancy reduction criterion, canonical correlation analysis (CCA), and information bottleneck (IB) principle. The experimental results demonstrate that iGCL outperforms all baselines on five node classification benchmark datasets. iGCL also shows superior performance for different label ratios and is capable of resisting graph attacks, which indicates that iGCL has excellent generalization and robustness. The source code is available at https://github.com/lehaifeng/ T-GCN/tree/master/iGCL.

Towards Alignment-Uniformity Aware Representation in Graph Contrastive Learning.

Debiased Graph Contrastive Learning.

Graph Contrastive Learning with High-Order Feature Interactions and Adversarial Wasserstein-distance-based Alignment

Augmentation-Free Graph Contrastive Learning of Invariant-Discriminative Representations

Adversarial Cluster-Level and Global-Level Graph Contrastive Learning for node representation

Graph Contrastive Representation Learning with Input-Aware and Cluster-Aware Regularization

Unbiased and augmentation-free self-supervised graph representation learning

Rethinking Graph Contrastive Learning: an Efficient Single-View Approach Via Instance Discrimination

Graph Contrastive Learning with Node-Level Accurate Difference

Enhancing Graph Contrastive Learning with Node Similarity

Perfect Alignment May be Poisonous to Graph Contrastive Learning

Neighborhood Contrastive Representation Learning for Attributed Graph Clustering

Neighbor Contrastive Learning on Learnable Graph Augmentation

Graph Representation Learning via Contrasting Cluster Assignments

Negative-Free Self-Supervised Gaussian Embedding of Graphs

Adaptive Graph Contrastive Learning for Community Detection

Unifying Graph Contrastive Learning with Flexible Contextual Scopes

Graph Contrastive Learning with Cohesive Subgraph Awareness

Prototypical Contrastive Learning through Alignment and Uniformity for Recommendation

Adaptive Negative Representations for Graph Contrastive Learning

Prototypical Graph Contrastive Learning