Abstract:Formal verification provides a rigorous and systematic approach to ensure the correctness and reliability of software systems. Yet, constructing specifications for the full proof relies on domain expertise and non-trivial manpower. In view of such needs, an automated approach for specification synthesis is desired. While existing automated approaches are limited in their versatility, i.e., they either focus only on synthesizing loop invariants for numerical programs, or are tailored for specific types of programs or invariants. Programs involving multiple complicated data types (e.g., arrays, pointers) and code structures (e.g., nested loops, function calls) are often beyond their capabilities. To help bridge this gap, we present AutoSpec, an automated approach to synthesize specifications for automated program verification. It overcomes the shortcomings of existing work in specification versatility, synthesizing satisfiable and adequate specifications for full proof. It is driven by static analysis and program verification, and is empowered by large language models (LLMs). AutoSpec addresses the practical challenges in three ways: (1) driving \name by static analysis and program verification, LLMs serve as generators to generate candidate specifications, (2) programs are decomposed to direct the attention of LLMs, and (3) candidate specifications are validated in each round to avoid error accumulation during the interaction with LLMs. In this way, AutoSpec can incrementally and iteratively generate satisfiable and adequate specifications. The evaluation shows its effectiveness and usefulness, as it outperforms existing works by successfully verifying 79% of programs through automatic specification synthesis, a significant improvement of 1.592x. It can also be successfully applied to verify the programs in a real-world X509-parser project.

A Comprehensive Specification and Verification of the L4 Microkernel API

Applying Rely-Guarantee Reasoning on Concurrent Memory Management and Mailbox in μC/OS-II: A Case Study.

Verification of the L4 IPC implementation

Formal Verification of L4 Memory Management Using SPIN

Automatically ‘verifying’ Discrete-Time Complex Systems Through Learning, Abstraction and Refinement

OpenBSD formal driver verification with SeL4

Automatic Kernel Code Synthesis and Verification

Large-scale Formal Verification in Practice: a Process Perspective

Simulation Modeling of a Large-Scale Formal Verification Process

Verifying Freertos' Cyclic Doubly Linked List Implementation: from Abstract Specification to Machine Code

Practical Rely/Guarantee Verification of an Efficient Lock for seL4 on Multicore Architectures

Research on Method of Formal Design and Verification of Memory Management Based on Microkernel Architecture

VTOS: Research on Methodology of "Light-Weight" Formal Design and Verification for Microkernel OS.

Research on Microkernel Integrity Semantics Model and Formal Verification

Fine-Grained Formal Specification and Analysis of Buddy Memory Allocation in Zephyr RTOS

Formal Specification and Verification of Separation Kernels: an Overview.

VSOS-HAM:Research on Isabelle/HOL-based OS kernel hardwareabstract model and formal verification method

Enchanting Program Specification Synthesis by Large Language Models using Static Analysis and Program Verification

Verification Framework for UML-Based Design of Embedded Systems.

Verifying Parallel Low-Level Programs for Multi-core Processor

RTL Verification for Secure Speculation Using Contract Shadow Logic