Abstract:In recent years, American cities and college campuses experienced protests over outrage and a sense of injustice ignited by events where Black youth were shot and killed by authorities. While these events capture national attention, researchers have identified more subtle and pervasive forms of discrimination and bias in education and work environments.1 College campuses, as microcosms of society, are not immune from these issues. Campus racial climate models indicate an interrelationship between racial/ethnic composition of the campus, perceptions of the campus as hostile or welcoming, and cross-racial interaction on campus that influence educational outcomes.2 Research has established the educational value of frequent and quality interactions across race/ethnicity for both racial/ ethnic minority and majority students. Positive interactions resulted in desirable outcomes, while negative interactions with diverse peers resulted in lower scores on many academic and democratic outcomes.3 Given recent sociohistorical events, it is important to understand the context for negative interactions. The central question we address is whether distinctions in the college composition of Blacks, Latina/ os, and Native Americans are associated with rates of discrimination and bias on campus. In a previous HERI brief, we concluded low representation of these groups is detrimental to campus climate and subsequent participation in a diverse workforce.4 We extend this research to show the relationship between students’ discrimination and bias experiences among African American and Latina/o college students averaged across six years of national data collection and students’ sense of belonging on campus, a key antecedent to retention in college. The data for this brief come from the experiences of 8,887 underrepresented minority (URM) students who attended 58 four-year campuses that took part in the Diverse Learning Environments (DLE) survey between 2010 and 2015. The DLE is a national survey designed to assist campuses in evaluating their campus climate, institutional practices, and student outcomes.5 The sample includes 24 public and 34 private four-year institutions that vary in terms of URM enrollment, including public campuses in Texas and California that no longer use race in admissions decisions. In order to track change from the previous research brief, the data are focused on institutions where African Americans are not the largest minority group. A larger dataset (82 campuses) was also used to specifically illustrate Latina/o student patterns of discrimination and bias experiences. The same cutoffs for URM representation were used to categorize campuses into low (less than 20%), moderate (21–35%), and high representation (36% and above) as in previous research.6 Discrimination and Bias, Underrepresentation, and Sense of Belonging on Campus

Overcoming Discrimination: Harassment and Discrimination Dynamics

A Dynamic Model of Integration

Recent Contributions to Theories of Discrimination

Experienced, Anticipated, and Vicarious Discrimination: Consequences and Resilience for Minority Adolescents’ School Engagement

Ethnic discrimination in neighborhood ingroup-outgroup encounters: Reducing threat-perception and increasing fairness as possible solutions

Persistence of discrimination: revisiting Axtell, Epstein and Young

Attentional discrimination and victim testimony

Institutional Discrimination and Assimilation: Evidence from the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882

The social patterning of vicarious discrimination: Implications for health equity

Getting In, Getting Hired, Getting Sideways Looks: Organizational Hierarchy and Perceptions of Racial Discrimination

A Short-term Intervention for Long-term Fairness in the Labor Market

Why Diversity Became Orthodox in Higher Education, and How it Changed the Meaning of Race on Campus

Cultural Diversity at Work: The Effects of Diversity Perspectives on Work Group Processes and Outcomes

Discrimination and Bias, Underrepresentation, and Sense of Belonging on Campus

Effects of Racial Demographics, Ideology, and Economic Threat on Majority Group Discrimination Claims

Trajectories of Discrimination across the College Years: Associations with Academic, Psychological, and Physical Adjustment Outcomes

Can minorities discriminate against majorities? An analysis of academic and ordinary usage

Contextual Prejudice: How Occupational Context and Stereotypes Shape Bias against Gay and Lesbian Employees

Examining Needs and Opportunities for Supporting Students Who Experience Discrimination

Social Networks as a Mechanism for Discrimination

Addressing Workplace Harassment and Discrimination: Strategies for Creating Inclusive Environments in Construction Engineering