[Clinical significance of monitoring NUP98::NSD1 fusion genes before and after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation].

Y K Shang,X A Pan,Y J Chang,Y Q Qin,Y Wang,C H Yan,Y Q Sun,X J Huang,X S Zhao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2023.12.007
2023-01-01
Abstract:Objective: This study aimed to observe the dynamic changes of NUP98::NSD1 expression before and after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) . Moreover, the clinical value of measurable residual disease (MRD) was analyzed. Methods: Sixteen AML patients who were diagnosed with the NUP98::NSD1 fusion gene and received allo-HSCT at Peking University People's Hospital were included. The NUP98::NSD1 fusion gene and leukemia-associated immunophenotype (LAIP) were monitored before and after transplantation to evaluate their MRD status. Results: The median follow-up time for all patients was 526 days (139-1136 days) , with four patients (25.0%) experiencing hematological recurrence at a median of 474 days (283-607 days) after transplantation. Three patients (18.8%) died, two of whom (12.5%) died of leukemia recurrence. The median expression level of NUP98::NSD1 in newly diagnosed patients with complete data was 78.5% (18.9%-184.4%) at the time of initial diagnosis. The recurrence rate was higher in NUP98::NSD1-positive patients after transplantation, with 44.4% of patients experiencing recurrence, whereas no recurrence occurred in NUP98::NSD1-negative patients after transplantation. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve predicted by the NUP98::NSD1 level after transplantation was 1.000 (95% confidence interval: 1.000-1.000, P=0.003) . Among the four patients with recurrence, NUP98::NSD1 was more sensitive than flow cytometry residual (FCM) and Wilms' tumor gene 1 (WT1) . Conclusions: The NUP98::NSD1 fusion gene can be used to evaluate the MRD status of allo-HSCT. NUP98::NSD1-positive patients after transplantation have a high relapse rate and poor prognosis. NUP98::NSD1 was more sensitive than FCM and WT1 in predicting posttransplant relapse.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?