Abstract:Abstract Frameworks that seek to understand how knowledge restructuring occurs and how to build a learning environment that facilitates this restructuring raise important philosophical, psychological and pedagogical questions and issues about how conceptual change occurs and what characteristics of knowledge growth ought to be a part of curricula and learning environments. Implicit in emphasizing the how is a shift in science educations' perspective from one that embraces “scientists' ways of knowing” as the dominant objective towards one that favors “positioning the learner for the next step.” This change in perspective and approach represents a radical and complex departure from common practice. This article advances a piecemeal model of the character and mechanism of restructuring and then describes a model of educational practice designed to facilitate this form of restructuring. We argue that a piecemeal developmental perspective of conceptual change would offer quite different criteria for deciding what to teach and how to teach. The adoption of conceptual change teaching models implies teacher empowerment of a kind we have yet to fully understand. Empowering teachers with appropriate philosophical and psychological models for the selection and the sequencing of instructional tasks would aid in their describing and prescribing effective or meaningful learning strategies. Central to this educational model is a broadened and integrated view of assessment and instruction that we are calling a portfolio culture. The essential characteristic of this culture is that it creates opportunities for teachers and students to confront and develop their scientific understanding and to equip students with the tools necessary to take increased responsibility for their own restructuring, to assess for themselves what might be the next steps.

Nested Learning Systems for the Thinking Curriculum

Thinking and Learning in Nested Systems: The Individual Level

Reinventing Systems for Equity

Rethinking Learning: What the Interdisciplinary Science Tells Us

Transforming schools into communities of thinking and learning about serious matters.

Assessing Students' Computational Thinking In A Learning By Modeling Environment

What Kind of Learning Is Needed in The 21st Century?-A New Explanation of Overall Vision and Four Learning

Epistemological perspectives on conceptual change: Implications for educational practice

Mapping computational thinking mindsets between educational levels with cognitive network science

Growing Points for a Synthesis Between the Sciences of Learning, School Reform, and Inequity: Insights From Complex Dynamical Systems Theory

Ways of thinking in STEM-based problem solving

Designing computer learning environments for engineering and computer science: The scaffolded knowledge integration framework

Imagine: Design for Creative Thinking, Learning, and Assessment in Schools

Complex Thinking in the Framework of Education 4.0 and Open Innovation—A Systematic Literature Review

Thinking fast and slow and science education

Spatial thinking: Why it belongs in the preschool classroom.

The development of scientific thinking skills in elementary and middle school

Refocusing Civic Education: Developing the Skills Young People Need to Engage in Democracy

Model based learning as a key research area for science education

The System Architecture-Function-Outcome Framework for Fostering and Assessing Systems Thinking in First-Year STEM Education and Its Potential Applications in Case-Based Learning

From Knowledge Transmission to Thinking Teaching: The Integrated Design of Interdisciplinary Curriculum for Empowering Minds