Effect Of National Policy Changes On Hospice Utilization And The Invasiveness Of End-Of-Life Care In Cancer Patients.
Yu-Yun Shao,Han-Chung Hsiue,Chih-Hung Hsu,Ho-Min Chen,Mei-Shu Lai,Ann-Lii Cheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.10008
IF: 45.3
2016-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:10008 Background: In 2011, two significant policy changes to foster hospice service for terminal cancer patients became effective in Taiwan. The single-payer National Health Insurance (NHI) of Taiwan started to reimburse full hospice service, and National hospital accreditation included hospice utilization in the evaluation. We aimed to assess their influence on hospice utilization and end-of-life (EOL) care of patients with cancer. Methods: We reviewed the NHI research database (NHIRD) and National Death Registry to include all patients who aged ≥ 18 years and died of cancer from Jan 1 2008 to Dec 31 2013. Data regarding utilization and costs of medical service were retrieved from NHIRD. Data regarding cancer diagnosis were retrieved from the database of National Cancer Registry. We compared the hospice utilization and invasive EOL care in the last month of life before (year 2008 to 2010) and after (year 2011 to 2013) the policy changes were implemented. Results: A total of 249,394 cancer patients were included. Comparing before and after the policy changes in 2011, hospice utilization increased from 20.8% to 36.2%, intensive care unit (ICU) admission decreased from 17.7% to 15.7%, invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) decreased from 16.7% to 13.0%, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) from 8.3% to 6.6%. Before and after the policy changes, 0.65% and 0.61% of total NHI expenditure was spent in the last month of life of cancer patients, respectively. In multivariate analysis adjusting for age, gender, marital status, socioeconomic status, cancer origin, cancer survival time, comorbidities, hospital characteristics, and hospice availability, hospice utilization significantly increased after the policy changes (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.36, p < 0.001), accompanied by a decrease in ICU admission, IMV, and CPR (AORs, 0.86, 0.93, 0.80, respectively, all p < 0.001). Patients who received hospice service were significantly less likely to have ICU admissions, IMV, and CPR (AORs, 0.20, 0.12, 0.10, respectively, all p < 0.001). Conclusions: Policy changes fostering hospice care significantly increased hospice utilization and decreased invasiveness of EOL care in terminal cancer patients.