Abstract:We analyze how stylized Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs), and specifically the widely‐used Dynamic Integrated Climate‐Economy model (DICE), represent the cost of emissions abatement. Many assume temporal independence—that abatement costs in one period are not affected by prior abatement. We contrast this with three dimensions of dynamic realism in emitting systems: (i) inertia, (ii) induced innovation, and (iii) path dependence. We review key evidence from the last quarter century on each of these three components. Studies of stock lifetime, dynamics of diffusion and past transitions suggest typical transition timescales of at least 20–40 years for the bulk emitting systems. The evidence that substantial innovation is induced by both prices and market deployment is unambiguous. Finally, both data and a rapidly growing literature demonstrate substantial path dependence in general, and specifically "carbon lock‐in and lock‐out." Some stylized models in the past decade have incorporated technology learning, and others have considered inertia, but the combination of these factors is important and not yet evident. More complex hybrid IAMs with technology‐rich energy‐system models incorporate these factors, but their complexity has limited the wider understanding and influence of their underlying insights. Few if any global models fully represent path dependence. We conclude with likely implications drawing upon the empirical and modeling evidence accumulated, including results from extending DICE with a highly stylized representation of such dynamic factors. This suggests that dynamic interdependencies could multiply several‐fold the optimal level of initial abatement expenditure. This is because early abatement then also directly facilitates subsequent emission savings. The diversity of dynamic linkages across sectors and technologies also implies more nuanced policy than a single global carbon price. Thus, the issues explored in this review can radically change the general policy conclusions drawn from models, which, like DICE, neglect dynamic realism.This article is categorized under: <ul class="plain-list"><li>Climate Economics > Aggregation Techniques for Impacts and Mitigation Costs</li></ul>

Non-carbon dioxide emissions modeling in integrated assessment models: A review

Progress of Integrated Assessment Models for Climate Policy

Exploring the possibility space: taking stock of the diverse capabilities and gaps in integrated assessment models

A Mixed-Effect Model Approach for Assessing Land-Based Mitigation in Integrated Assessment Models: A Regional Perspective.

Cost-benefit Assessment for Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in Rice-Based Agriculture

emIAM v1.0: an emulator for Integrated Assessment Models using marginal abatement cost curves

Modeling myths: On DICE and dynamic realism in integrated assessment models of climate change mitigation

Quantifying greenhouse gas emissions in agricultural systems: a comparative analysis of process models

An AgMIP framework for improved agricultural representation in IAMs

Robust climate change research: a review on multi-model analysis

The Future Development of Energy- Environment-Economy Integrated Assessment Modelling

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Transparency and integrated assessment modeling

A Quantitative Assessment of the Implications of Including Non-CO2 Emissions in the European ETS

Climate Module Disparities Explain Inconsistent Estimates of the Social Cost of Carbon in Integrated Assessment Models

The Role of Uncertainty in Controlling Climate Change

A review on the evaluation models and impact factors of greenhouse gas emissions from municipal solid waste management processes

Progress, Curse, or Mixed Blessing: the Impacts of Multiple Climate Ambiguities on the Optimal Carbon Emission Abatement Policy

A deep dive into the modelling assumptions for biomass with carbon capture and storage (BECCS): a transparency exercise

Modeling CH4 and N2O Emissions for Continuous and Noncontinuous Flooding Rice Systems

Modeling greenhouse gas emissions from riverine systems: A review

Modelling of sectoral emissions of short-lived and long-lived climate pollutants under various control technological strategies