The Role of Understory Vegetation in Surface Fluxes of Carbonyl Sulfide in a Boreal Forest

Kadmiel Maseyk,Wu Sun,Ulli Seibt,Linda Kooijmans,Huilin Chen,Kukka-Maaria Kohonen,Pasi Kolari,Juho Alto,Ivan Mammarella,Timo Vesala
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-15986
2024-01-01
Abstract:The parallel uptake of carbonyl sulfide (COS) with CO2 during photosynthesis provides an opportunity to constrain gross photosynthesis at ecosystem and larger scales. To use COS for this purpose we need to understand the scaling factor between COS and CO2 fluxes (the leaf or ecosystem relative uptake ratio) and the influence of other COS sinks or sources. This information is obtained from chamber measurements and ecosystem flux measurements, and in the case of uptake ratios tends to be focussed on the dominant canopy layer. However, in many ecosystems the understory vegetation is an important component of the overall productivity, and experiences microclimate conditions different from the canopy that can influence the uptake ratios. Where the vegetation is close to or appressed to the soil surface provides an interesting case, as it can reduce soil COS uptake or mitigate soil COS release. We measured soil and forest floor COS, CO2, and CO fluxes in a boreal forest (Hyytiälä, Finland) with a surface vegetation layer of moss and dwarf shrubs (Vaccinium species) using chambers, alongside ecosystem fluxes by eddy covariance, through a growing season (April – November 2016). COS fluxes from moss-covered surfaces did not differ appreciably from bare-soil fluxes, but COS uptake was approximately twice as high where vascular vegetation was present. The vegetated surfaces were a net source of CO2 through the season due to soil respiration exceeding photosynthesis, but diurnal patterns show a clear influence of the vegetation on CO2 fluxes. COS:CO2 flux ratios were consequently lower from the vegetated surface compared to soil (or moss covered soil) but decreased with temperature in the same manner as soil flux ratios. A first estimate of the surface vegetation fluxes indicate they make up about 15% of the ecosystem COS flux, and therefore understanding the magnitude and behaviour of understory COS fluxes is important as we develop our understanding of the relationship between COS and CO2 for large scale photosynthesis estimates.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?