Variability of Root Length Density As Measured by Auger Core and Soil Profile Sampling Methods
Hongyu Wang,Zhengguo Cui,Zhenming Yang,Muhammad Rehman Naseer,Qiuzhu Li,Jinhu Cui
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17957/ijab/15.1052
2019-01-01
International Journal of Agriculture and Biology
Abstract:Root sampling methods, destructive excavation of monoliths (as reference method) and soil coring using auger, were compared for correlations and mean differences in root length density (RLD). Significant correlations between auger and monoliths methods were observed for RLD of maize roots in each depth interval (0.5198<=r<=0.7443, P < 0.01 at each depth), and when depths were pooled (r=0.692, P < 0.01). Linear relationships were also observed for faba within the 20 to 80 cm depth intervals. In contrast, there were no significant correlations observed in RLD between methods for barley or wheat at any depth. Overall, the average RLD from the soil depth of 100 cm for maize was 0.56 cm cm(-3) (0-4.48 cm cm(-3) range) in auger core, but only 0.37 cm cm(-3) (0 to 1.32 cm cm(-3) range) in monolith samples (F=20.08, P=0.0464). This indicates that RLD estimates will be higher when maize roots are sampled by the auger method than when monoliths are dug, particularly in the top 40 cm of soil. Average RLD did not vary between methods for wheat or barley (F=10.53, P=0.0833). It was, therefore, concluded that auger and monolith methods both yield reliable RLD data for fine root systems (e.g., barley and wheat). In contrast, RLDs of crops with coarser and taproots (e g, maize and faba bean) were likely overestimated by the auger core method. Thus, the monolith method is likely more suitable for crops with coarser and taproot systems. These results are partly benefited for field researchers in optimizing root sampling methods. (C) 2019 Friends Science Publishers