High Resolution 3-D Mapping of Soil Organic Carbon at Field-Scale with Multi-Source Proximal Sensing Data Fusion and INLA-SPDE

Wenjun Ji,Ye Hao,Baoguo Li,Yang Yan,Yuanfang Huang,Zhou Shi,Jianxin Yin,Tusheng Ren,Hu Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-9622
2024-01-01
Abstract:Soil organic carbon (SOC) plays an important role in the carbon cycling of terrestrial ecosystems, and smallholder quantification of soil carbon stocks also has significant contribution to greenhouse gas emission, especially in black soil areas. The objective of this study was to evaluate a strategy for assessing soil organic carbon using 3D digital soil mapping with INLA-SPDE and proximal soil sensor data fusion, and compare it to traditional spatial interpolation with 3D-IDW. A total of 42 soil cores, with a grid sampling strategy (50 m), were collected from a 16.5 ha field in typical black soil area of the Northeast China. At each sampling location, 10 soil samples were collected from the surface down to 1m depth with a 10cm depth interval and their SOC contents were measured with standard laboratory method. The visible and near-infrared (350-2500 nm, Vis-NIR) and mid-infrared (4000-650 cm-1, MIR) spectra were collected in situ immediately after the samples were collected. At the same day, the apparent electrical conductivity (EC) and topography were measured with an EM-38 and a real-time kinematic global navigation satellite systems receiver, respectively. The 42 soil cores were split to calibration and validation set by ranking the topsoil SOC from high to low with a 3:1 ratio. Different combinations of the data from the four sensors were used as environmental covariates to model SOC in 3D with INLA-SPDE in Bayesian space stochastic simulation. By comparing the validation results to that of 3D-IDW, it was found that the map with INLA-SPDE and all ancillary predictors obtained the highest prediction accuracy with a R2 of 0.82 and RMSE of 2.10g kg-1, while the validation with 3D-IDW obtained the lowest value with a R2 of 0.42 and RMSE of 3.13g kg-1. The maps with INLA-SPDE also showed more detailed changes. By only adding the vis-NIR spectra using feature extraction, the maps generated with the INLA-SPDE could achieved acceptable accuracy (R2 = 0.76 and RMSE of 2.12g kg-1). We thus concluded that the use of 3D digital soil mapping with INLA-SPDE and proximal sensor data fusion is a promising way to assess soil organic carbon.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?