Metamorphic P–T-t path and tectonic implications of the eclogite from Changning–Menglian orogenic belt, southeastern Tibetan Plateau

Ying Zhou,Hao Cheng,Zhimin Peng,Yuzhen Fu,Kaiyang Du
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-5883
2024-01-01
Abstract:Understanding the relationship between ultra-high-pressure (UHP) metamorphic rocks and their surrounding country rocks is crucial for interpreting the tectono-metamorphic dynamics within orogenic belts. This study focuses on the Changning&#8211;Menglian orogenic belt in Southeast Tibet to delineate the subduction history of the Paleo-Tethys Ocean. We integrate garnet Sm&#8211;Nd and Lu&#8211;Hf dating, rutile/zircon U&#8211;Pb geochronology, phase equilibria modeling, and thermobarometry to examine high-pressure eclogites and surrounding metasediments. Pseudosection modeling and conventional thermobarometry suggest a clockwise pressure-temperature (P&#8211;T) path for the eclogite, from ~1.4 GPa/~505&#8211;530 &#176;C to ~2.4&#8211;2.8 GPa/~600&#8211;640 &#176;C, followed by decompression to <~0.7 GPa. The micaschists reached peak conditions of 2.0&#8211;2.2 GPa and 570&#8211;620 &#176;C. Lu&#8211;Hf dating yields ages of around 236&#8211;241 Ma for the eclogites and 249&#8211;251 Ma for the micaschists. Sm&#8211;Nd dating indicates a similar age range for the eclogites (236&#8211;242 Ma) but yields slightly younger ages for the micaschists (~240 Ma). These results imply a brief period of garnet growth in the eclogites, suggested by Rayleigh-fractionation-style Lu zoning and a rimward increase in Sm concentration within garnet. In contrast, the micaschists exhibit a more prolonged garnet growth period of approximately 10 Myr. The comparable peak metamorphic conditions and high-pressure metamorphic ages in both rock types suggest they underwent a concurrent subduction-exhumation cycle. Magmatic zircon U&#8211;Pb dating establishes the protolith age of the metabasaltic rocks at ca. 247 Ma. The multi-mineral geochronological data indicate a rapid transition from oceanic divergence to convergence within the orogenic belt around 250 Ma. These findings, along with previous geochronological data on continental subduction, point to a brief ~20 Myr cycle involving the formation, deep burial (exceeding 75 km), and subsequent ascent to the shallow crust of the Paleo-Tethys oceanic rocks. This evidence supports a continuous transition from oceanic to continental subduction within the region.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?