Abstract:Students rely on their heuristic reasoning strategies when solving a problem based on an unobservable concept such as heat transfer. Metacognitive awareness of effectively using such strategies as and when required is essential. However, such awareness cannot be taught implicitly in students unless intervened by methods that reflect or test their solutions. This exploratory study is an investigation of the reasoning processes of 7 senior secondary students working on a heat shield problem based on the Columbia shuttle disaster while using simulation software. Two types of students (A): Students who realize errors in their solutions, are aware of the heuristics used to lead to the erroneous outcome, and embark upon refining their solution into an optimal solution (B): Students who realize errors in their solutions, are not aware of the heuristics used that lead to the erroneous outcome, and do not refine their solution were found during the study.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper explores the role of simulation tools in promoting heuristic and analytic reasoning in chemistry education. The study observed the problem-solving process of 7 high school students in relation to the heat shield problem (based on the Columbia space shuttle disaster). It was found that students rely on heuristic strategies when dealing with invisible concepts such as heat transfer. The study classified students into two categories: one group was able to recognize errors, understand the heuristic strategies leading to the errors, and improve their solutions; the other group was able to recognize errors but did not understand the heuristic strategies used, and did not improve their solutions.
The background of the paper mentions that heuristic strategies are quick decision rules that may be biased, while analytic reasoning requires more time and effort. Previous research has shown that heuristic strategies naturally form in certain situations and should not be eliminated, but should be intervened to make students reflect on and explain their choices in order to reduce errors. Simulation environments can help students create mental models of complex phenomena, develop higher-order thinking skills, and validate errors.
The research framework is based on the analysis-heuristic theory, which suggests that students create problem representations using heuristic strategies before using analytic reasoning to explain and correct their solutions. In the study, students were encouraged to reflect on their heuristic choices through simulation software, with the expectation of promoting solution improvement.
The methods section describes a 3-day activity where students worked independently and in groups using simulation software to solve the heat shield design problem. Data was collected through audio recordings, videos, screen recordings, and reports to analyze the students' heuristic reasoning and the impact of simulation on them.
The results revealed that students used five heuristic strategies and two categories of students were identified through analysis: one group was able to identify errors, understand them, and correct the heuristic strategies, while the other group was able to identify errors but did not understand the heuristic strategies and did not significantly improve their solutions. The simulation tool helped the first group of students reflect on and improve their solutions, while the second group, although able to identify errors, did not have a deep understanding of the heuristic strategies and did not significantly improve their solutions.
The discussion section points out that simulation aids in the development of students' metacognition, but different types of students have varying abilities to reflect on and regulate heuristic strategies. Older students (12th grade) are more likely to be in the first group, displaying better metacognitive abilities.