Autonomous laboratories for accelerated materials discovery: a community survey and practical insights

Linda Hung,Joyce Yager,Danielle Monteverde,Dave Baiocchi,Ha-Kyung Kwon,Shijing Sun,Santosh Suram
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-fhn1k
2024-03-01
Abstract:What are researchers’ motivations and challenges related to automation and autonomy in materials science laboratories? Our survey on this topic received 102 responses from researchers across a variety of institutions and in a variety of roles. Accelerated discovery was a clear theme in the responses, and another theme was concern about the role of human researchers. Survey respondents shared a variety of use cases targeting accelerated materials discovery, including examples where partial automation is preferred over full self-driving laboratories. Building on the observed patterns of researcher priorities and needs, we propose a framework for levels of laboratory autonomy from non-automated (L0) to fully autonomous (L5).
Chemistry
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper primarily explores the application of automated laboratories in the field of materials science research and its impact on accelerating material discovery. Researchers conducted a community survey collecting opinions from 102 researchers from different institutions and roles, aiming to understand their motivations, challenges, and perspectives regarding laboratory automation and autonomy. The core focus points of the paper include: 1. **Accelerating Material Discovery**: The vast majority of respondents believe that improving efficiency (i.e., accelerating research) is the main driver for implementing automation. Additionally, the study explores the rate-limiting steps (RLS) in laboratory workflows and whether these steps are suitable for automation to achieve acceleration goals. 2. **Role of Human Researchers**: While some researchers believe that their scientific workflows can be fully automated, most think that certain tasks (such as hypothesis generation, data interpretation, etc.) require human flexibility, creativity, and expertise, and are therefore not suitable for automation. 3. **Levels of Laboratory Autonomy**: Based on the needs and preferences of researchers, the paper proposes a framework for laboratory autonomy ranging from non-automated (L0) to fully autonomous (L5). This framework helps to understand the capabilities of laboratories at different levels of automation and provides a reference standard for future discussions. In summary, this paper attempts to answer key questions about automated laboratories in the field of materials science, including researchers' expectations and concerns about automation, how to balance automation with the role of humans, and how to set levels of laboratory autonomy based on different needs.