Abstract:Despite the great promises that artificial intelligence (AI) holds for health care, the uptake of such technologies into medical practice is slow. In this paper, we focus on the epistemological issues arising from the development and implementation of a class of AI for clinical practice, namely clinical decision support systems (CDSS). We will first provide an overview of the epistemic tasks of medical professionals, and then analyse which of these tasks can be supported by CDSS, while also explaining why some of them should remain the territory of human experts. Clinical decision making involves a reasoning process in which clinicians combine different types of information into a coherent and adequate 'picture of the patient' that enables them to draw explainable and justifiable conclusions for which they bear epistemological responsibility. Therefore, we suggest that it is more appropriate to think of a CDSS as clinical reasoning support systems (CRSS). Developing CRSS that support clinicians' reasoning process therefore requires that: (a) CRSSs are developed on the basis of relevant and well-processed data; and (b) the system facilitates an interaction with the clinician. Therefore, medical experts must collaborate closely with AI experts developing the CRSS. In addition, responsible use of an CRSS requires that the data generated by the CRSS is empirically justified through an empirical link with the individual patient. In practice, this means that the system indicates what factors contributed to arriving at an advice, allowing the user (clinician) to evaluate whether these factors are medically plausible and applicable to the patient. Finally, we defend that proper implementation of CRSS allows combining human and artificial intelligence into hybrid intelligence, were both perform clearly delineated and complementary empirical tasks. Whereas CRSSs can assist with statistical reasoning and finding patterns in complex data, it is the clinicians' task to interpret, integrate and contextualize.

Meta-architecture for the interoperability and knowledge management of archetype-based clinical decision support systems

Design and Development of a Sharable Clinical Decision Support System Based on a Semantic Web Service Framework

Development of a Service-Oriented Sharable Clinical Decision Support System Based on Ontology for Chronic Disease.

Integrating HL7 RIM and Ontology for Unified Knowledge and Data Representation in Clinical Decision Support Systems

An Integration Framework for Clinical Decision Support Applications

Accelerate Clinical Decision Support System Development by Converting Ontology to OpenEHR Archetypes

Developing a Rule-Driven Clinical Decision Support System with an Extensive and Adaptative Architecture

A multi-agent ontologies-based clinical decision support system

A systematic review of technologies and standards used in the development of rule-based clinical decision support systems

Decisional DNA for modeling and reuse of experiential clinical assessments in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment.

Transformation of Health and Social Care Systems-An Interdisciplinary Approach Toward a Foundational Architecture

Using Meta-Models to Manage Information Change in the Design Process of Systems of Systems

Integrated Perspectives on Clinical Decision Support: A Comparative Analysis of Knowledge Management Approaches

Expanding Medical Knowledge: A Clinical Decision Support System Utilizing Literature.

A Scalable Clinical Intelligent Decision Support System.

Clinical Decision Support Systems for Comorbidity: Architecture, Algorithms, and Applications

From clinical decision support to clinical reasoning support systems

Multi-National, Multi-Institutional Analysis of Clinical Decision Support Data Needs to Inform Development of the HL7 Virtual Medical Record Standard.

The Application of Knowledge-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems to Enhance Adherence to Evidence-Based Medicine in Chronic Disease

Archetypes for Representing Data about the Brazilian Public Hospital Information System and Outpatient High Complexity Procedures System

Towards Knowledge Sharing and Patient Privacy in a Clinical Decision Support System