Abstract:atrioventricular ablation. Objective: This study aimed to examine the long-term feasibility, safety, and efficacy of LBBP in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) after AVJ ablation and provide a comparison of LBBP versus His bundle pacing (HBP) through a propensity score (PS) matched analysis. Methods: We prospectively enrolled patients with AF and HF who were referred for AVJ ablation and LBBP between July 2017 to December 2019. The control group patients were selected from HBP implantations performed in the years 2012-2019 using PS matching with a 1:1 ratio. Results: A total of 99 patients were enrolled in this study. LBBP implant success rate was 100%. Significant improvements in the LVEF were observed in patients with HFrEF and HFpEF (p , 0.05). Threshold rise above 2V@0.5ms occurred in only one patient. Of 176/215 (81.9%) who received permanent HBP post- AVJ ablation, 86 patients were matched to the LBBP group by 1:1 PS (PS-HBP, N 5 86; PS-LBBP, N 5 86). No significant differences in echocardiographic or clinical outcomes were observed between the two groups (p . 0.05), while lower thresholds, greater sensed R-wave amplitudes, and fewer complications were observed in the PS-LBBP group (p , 0.05). Conclusion: LBBP is feasible, safe, and effective in patients with AF and HF post-AVJ ablation, which has similar clinical benefits, higher success rate, better pacing parameters, and fewer complications than HBP. Background: Benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) varies by QRS characteristics; individual randomized trials are underpowered to assess benefit for relatively small subgroups. Objective: To determine the relationship between QRS characteristics (morphology and duration) and CRT benefit using pooled patient level data from pivotal CRT trials. Methods: We analyzed patient level data from pivotal CRT trials (MIRACLE, MIRACLE-ICD, MIRACLE-ICD II, REVERSE, RAFT, COMPANION, and MADIT-CRT) using adjusted Bayesian Hierarchical Weibull survival regression models to assess CRT benefit by QRS morphology (LBBB, RBBB and IVCD) and duration (with 150ms partition). The continuous relationship between QRS duration and CRT benefit was also examined within subgroups defined by sex and QRS morphology. Results are presented using hazard ratios and 95% posterior credible intervals. The study endpoint was heart failure hospitalization (HFH) or death. Results: Of the 6,264 patients included, 25% were women, the mean age was 65 years, and 61% received CRT. CRT risk patients QRS either IVCD CRT QRS

Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Left Bundle Branch Block.

Bachmann's Bundle Modification in Addition to Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Novel Ablation Strategy.

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy by Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients with Heart Failure and Left Bundle Branch Block

Left Bundle Branch Pacing Postatrioventricular Junction Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Propensity Score Matching With His Bundle Pacing

Impact of left bundle branch block on heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Effect of Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Combination With Catheter Ablation on Left Atrial Function for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Prospective randomized comparison of left atrial and biatrial radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of atrial fibrillation

Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing vs. Right Ventricular Pacing for Atrioventricular Block

Long-term outcome of combined catheter ablation and left atrial appendage closure in atrial fibrillation patients

Feasibility of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Combined with Atrioventricular Node Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Heart Failure

Outcomes of combined left bundle branch area pacing with atrioventricular nodal ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation and pulmonary disease

Thoracoscopic Surgical Biatrial Ablation vs. Catheter Ablation in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Influence of left atrial structure and function by bipolar radio frequency current ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation

[Electrophysiological Findings and Ablation Strategies in Patients with Atrial Tachyarrhythmias after Left Atrial Circumferential Ablation in the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation].

Outcome of catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients with stable coronary artery disease

Combining catheter ablation and left atrial appendage occlusion in high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation: a propensity score-matched analysis

Effect of Catheter Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Long-term Outcomes of Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Comparison on the Left Atrial Anterior Wall Ablation Through Low-voltage Area Versus Left Lateral Mitral Isthmus Ablation in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

LEFT BUNDLE-BRANCH PACING POST- ATRIOVENTRICULAR JUNCTION ABLATION FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: PROPENSITY-SCORE MATCHING WITH HIS BUNDLE PACING

Optimalendpoint for Catheter Ablation of Longstanding Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Clinical Trial