Barriers to Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Access in Adult Patients in the Mayo-La Crosse Family Medicine Residency Clinic
Khyati H Patel,Benita N Lin,Jenna Mullins,Alexander S Mortensen,Stephen K Stacey
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.63114
2024-06-25
Cureus
Abstract:Introduction: Food insecurity remains a pressing issue in the United States, with approximately 12.8% of American households experiencing this challenge in 2023, as reported by the US Department of Agriculture (USDA). In Wisconsin, a state with a notable agricultural heritage, the prevalence of food insecurity averaged 9.9% between 2019 and 2023. A growing body of research underscores the importance of consuming diets rich in fruits and vegetables for maintaining optimal health and mitigating the risk of various chronic diseases, including cardiovascular disease (CVD) and obesity. Fruits and vegetables are reservoirs of essential nutrients such as vitamins, minerals, antioxidants, and dietary fiber, which collectively contribute to overall well-being. Despite the well-documented health benefits of fruits and vegetables, a considerable proportion of the population fails to meet the recommended daily intake of at least five servings. This disparity underscores the importance of exploring factors influencing dietary behaviors and identifying strategies to promote adherence to dietary guidelines. Methods: Surveys were distributed by staff at the family medicine residency clinic in La Crosse, Wisconsin, during routine visits in April and May 2023. Any patients ≥18 years old presenting to the Family Health Clinic (FHC) were eligible for inclusion. Patients were excluded if they were unable to read/answer survey questions due to intellectual/language/other barriers. Surveys included demographic data such as the participant's age, gender, race, income bracket, and primary mode of transportation. A total of 122 participants were then asked how many servings in a day they ate of 100% juice, fruits, beans, green vegetables, yellow/orange vegetables, and other vegetables, as well as about barriers to more fruit and vegetable consumption and a Likert scale about their attitudes toward fruit and vegetable consumption and interest in discussing it with a healthcare provider. Demographic characteristics were analyzed through graphical representation to elucidate trends and patterns among the surveyed population. We compared different demographics with the barriers to fruits and vegetables using bar graphs. Results: The primary barrier to fruit and vegetable intake varied by age group: "cost" for 18-30, "other" for 31-50, "cost" and "none" for 51-70, and "none" for over 70. For gender, "none" was most frequent for males while "cost" was for females. By income, "cost" was common for $0-20k and $20-50k, "none" for $50-100k, and "other" for >$100k. A Likert scale assessed interest in discussing healthy foods with healthcare providers. Most responses were "neutral," with "strongly agree" highest in 18-30 and "agree" in 31-50, 51-70, and over 70 age groups. Conclusions: The purpose of this study was to ascertain barriers to fruit and vegetable access and identify patients' attitudes toward discussing healthy food choices with healthcare providers. There appears to be a correlation between decreasing income and increasing age and the likelihood of identifying cost as a barrier to fruit/vegetable intake. Barriers identified in our clinic included convenience/time constraints and cost. Many people in our survey also identified the lack of quality or good variety of fruits and vegetables at the store (availability) as a significant barrier to eating them.