Visual field outcomes and refractive status of retinopathy of prematurity after laser treatment
Yuou Yao,Hong Yin,Xiaoxin Li,Mingwei Zhao,Jianhong Liang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1015.2017.02.009
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective To observe visual field outcome and refractive status of patients with retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) treated by laser photocoagulation.Method The data of 39 ROP patients (73 eyes) who received laser photocoagulation were retrospectively analyzed and compared with 13 normal control subjects (25 eyes) whose age and sex were matched with ROP group.There were 24 males (45 eyes) and 15 females (28 eyes) in ROP group,with an average age of (7.0± 1.28) years.The first laser treatment was carried out at postnatal age (PA) of (38.74±3.82) weeks,the birth weight (BW) of (1402.33 ±369.61) g and the number of laser burns was (517.86 ± 277.40).The control group included 7 females (13 eyes) and 6 males (12 eyes),with an average age of (7.17 ± 0.96) years.The age (t=0.691) and gender (x2=1.425) were comparable between the two groups (P=0.491,0.233).The data of patients and controls were retrospectively analyzed including best corrected visual acuity,refractive examination,automated perimetry test.The differences of the mean deviation (MD) of visual field and the spherical equivalent (SE) between these two groups were comparatively observed.ROP patients were divided into no VF loss group (MD≤2 dB) and VF loss group (MD＞2 dB),mild VF loss group (MD ≤ 6 dB) and moderate VF loss group (MD ＞6 dB) according to the results of automated perimetry test,the differences of gestational age (GA),PA,BW,number of laser burns and SE between these groups were comparatively observed.Results The MD in ROP group and control group were 4.87±5.12 dB and 1.27 ± 3.34 dB,respectively;the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (t=-4.01,P＜ 0.001).The subgroup analysis showed that BW,number of laser burns,and SE were significantly different between no VF loss group and VF loss group (t=2.074,-1.996,-2.162;P=0.042,0.026,0.034);while the GA was not significantly different between these two groups (t=1.973,P=0.052).The difference of PA was not statistical significant different between mild VF loss group and moderate VF loss group (t=2.03,P=0.051) and SE was significantly different between the above two groups (t=3.283,P=0.002).For refractive outcomes,the BW and ROP stage correlated with SE significantly (r=-0.304,-0.387;P=0.015,0.002).The mean BCVA in ROP group was 0.84±0.23,and 59 eyes (91.2％) with BCVA better than 0.5.Conclusion Laser treatment for ROP tends to have less effect on long term refractive status and VF loss,with good visual outcome.