Florbetapir PET Measurements of Amyloid Plaque Deposition Are More Closely Correlated with Cross‐Sectional and Longitudinal Cognitive and Clinical Measurements Using a White Matter Reference Region of Interest

Vedanshi Bhargava,Michele S Wang,Yinghua Chen,Ji Luo,Michael Weiner,Susan Landau,Yi Su,Eric M. Reiman,Kewei Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.078608
2023-01-01
Abstract:Background We previously reported stronger associations of FDG‐PET measured glucose hypometabolism with florbetapir PET measured Aβ deposition quantified using Standard Uptake Value Ratio (SUVR) with a cerebral white matter reference region (SUVR wm ) compared to the commonly used SUVR with cerebellar reference region (SUVR crblm ) both cross‐sectionally and longitudinally (Wang et al., AAIC 2021). This study compared cross‐sectional and longitudinal associations of SUVR wm and SUVR crblm with various cognitive/clinical measures Method Our study population consisted of 1133 participants from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) including 206 participants clinically diagnosed with AD dementia, 563 with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), and 364 cognitively unimpaired individuals (CU). We computed partial correlation of SUVR wm or SUVR crblm , covarying out baseline age and years of education, with Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE); Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum Boxes and Global (CDR‐SB and CDGlobal); Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS11, ADAS13); Auditory Verbal Learning Test – Short Term Memory, Long Term Memory, and Total (AVLT STM, AVLT LTM, and AVLT Total respectively). Steiger’s Z‐test was used to compare SUVR wm and SUVR crblm correlation coefficient differences with each of these cognitive/clinical measures at uncorrected p = 0.05 significance. Analyses were carried out over all subjects and within each diagnostic group, first for baseline data and then longitudinally. Result Cross sectionally, correlations were significantly stronger with SUVR wm than with SUVR crblm for all subjects in all cognitive/clinical measures (all p<1.314E‐04) with the strongest correlation of SUVR wmRef with MMSE (r = ‐0.4717 for SUVR wm and r = ‐0.3463 for SUVR crblm ; p = 1.93E‐13). The strongest correlation within AD subjects was found between SUVR wm and MMSE (r = ‐0.1432 for SUVR wm and r = 0.0459 for SUVR crblm; p = 9.7063E‐04). Longitudinally, stronger SUVR wm correlations than SUVR crblm with each of these cognitive measures were also observed over all subjects (p<0.05), and significance with CDR‐SB and AVLT Total in AD; with MMSE, ADAS11, ADAS13, CDGlobal, CDR‐SB, AVLT Total in MCI; and with CDGlobal in CU. Conclusion The use of cerebral white matter reference region for florbetapir PET SUVR quantification demonstrated stronger associations between amyloid deposition and cognitive measures than cerebellar reference region.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?