Precision Nutrition: 8 Stages and 5 Dimensions

Yun Song,Ping Chen,Pierre Zalloua,Jianping Li,Hanping Shi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/pn9.0000000000000057

2023-01-01

Abstract:Introduction and background Nutrition is crucial for human life, from growth, development, to health maintenance. It plays a vital role in improving quality of life and driving economic and social development. Over the last decade, China has experienced a substantial improvement in food supply and living standards, which has had a significant positive impact on the nutritional and health status of the population. Despite these gains, several challenges remain to be addressed, including the dual burden of undernutrition and overnutrition, the high prevalence of nutrition-related diseases and unhealthy lifestyles, and the underutilization of nutritional supplementation. These issues have emerged as critical factors that impact population health. Malnutrition refers to deficiencies or excesses in nutrient intake, imbalance of essential nutrients, or impaired nutrient utilization. Malnutrition is a critical social and economic problem that continues to impede global development. Malnutrition not only affects physical and mental health but also contributes to the occurrence of life-threatening diseases.[1] It is estimated that in total, all forms of malnutrition cause societal losses of up to US$3.5 trillion annually, whereas overweight and obesity alone cost US$500 billion annually.[2] The consequences of malnutrition include increased child mortality, disabilities among adults, non-communicable diseases associated with diet, and significant economic and human capital costs. Improving nutrition can have powerful and positive effects across various aspects of health and development, such as reducing poverty and promoting environmental sustainability, peace, and stability. As the former United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan stated, “Nutrition is one of the best drivers of development, inspiring a virtuous cycle of social and economic improvements, such as increased education and job creation.”[3] Micronutrient deficiency is often neglected due to its less visible symptoms, however, it is a critical aspect of malnutrition.[4] Micronutrient deficiencies refer to a state of poor nutrition caused by insufficient intake or absorption of one or more vitamins or minerals. Several micronutrients, including iron, zinc, vitamin A, folate, and iodine, have received global attention because the adverse effects associated with inadequate intake of these nutrients remain problematic worldwide.[5] Adequate intake of these micronutrients is extremely difficult to meet without a diversified diet. An imbalanced nutritional status caused by insufficient micronutrient intake can increase the risk of serious diseases and accelerate their development.[6] There is a high proportion of nutritional imbalance among the Chinese population, especially with regard to insufficient intake of micronutrients, such as folate and vitamin D. To improve national nutrition and health most effectively, it is important to make nutrition recommendations and supplementation plans that are tailored to individual characteristics. In this context, the concept of precision nutrition has emerged in recent years, guided by the scientific theories of nutrigenetics and nutrigenomics.[7] The proposal and development of precision nutrition have stimulated the scientific exploration of nutrition for disease prevention and control.[8] We aimed to develop a systematic framework for accurate, individualized nutrition tests, and recommendations, based on principles of nutritional genetics and nutritional genomics, and supported by evidence from the results of multi-group studies and epidemiological studies. In this framework, precision nutrition can be implemented at any one of three levels: (1) Traditional nutrition, the most basic level, which involves general guidelines for population groups based on age, gender, and social determinants; (2) Personalized nutrition, which additionally considers phenotype information related to an individual’s current nutrition status, such as biochemical and metabolic analysis, anthropometric measurements, and physical activity[9]; and (3) Genotype-guided precision nutrition, which considers rare or common genetic variations to determine an individual’s response to certain nutritional plans.[10] There is a growing body of research exploring the link between genetics and nutrition (nutrigenomics), which has enabled the development of personalized nutrition programs that account for an individual’s genetic makeup. The availability of genetic information has greatly increased in recent years due to the development of large-scale laboratory and bioinformatics technologies. Opportunities are blooming to explore interindividual genetic differences and their relationships with nutrition-related metabolic variation. Multiple genetic variants have been found to affect nutrient metabolism.[11] Different health outcomes are often observed among populations with similar nutritional intake but with different genetic makeup. To effectively benefit from the complexity and diversity of nutritional assessment methods and data outputs, ranging from biomolecular assays to statistical methods, the appropriate methods must be selected for a given experimental design, and likewise, the appropriate statistical and bioinformatics tools must be utilized to interpret the data and methods.[12] Nutritional genomics utilizes many methods developed in the fields of nutrition and genomics, including high-throughput omics technologies such as genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metagenomics, metabolomics, and epigenomics.[13] A systems biology approach is required for a nutritional genomics evaluation, which uses many high-throughput omics platforms to identify metabolically sensitive processes relevant to nutrition. Each analysis platform (genomics, proteomics, transcriptomics, metabolomics, or epigenomics) provides necessary and complementary information, and needs to be appropriately integrated to fully understand the mechanisms underlying diet and health.[14] Finally, we bring our focus to two types of populations: the potential high-risk population without disease but with poor nutritional status, and the population with disease and whose nutritional status needs to be improved. In either case, accurate screening and diagnosis, combined with scientific support provided by population-scale big data analysis, is required to achieve precision nutrition intervention for chronic diseases by combining treatment with prevention. Through precision nutrition, a new model of chronic disease management, medical care, and elderly care can be established to more effectively address the health issues of patients with chronic diseases, and patients who are at high risk for developing chronic diseases.[15–19] To leverage the rising tide of large-scale population dietary and nutrition data, it is essential to actively integrate artificial intelligence, big data, advanced models, cloud technology, blockchain, and other information methods. By staying on the cutting edge of science and technology, we can establish the most comprehensive and dynamic nutrition solution possible to prevent disease and promote health literacy.[20–22] The 8 stages and 5 dimensions of precision nutrition Based on the theoretical foundation outlined above, we have developed a novel framework of the “8 stages and 5 dimensions” of precision nutrition, as shown in Figure 1.Figure 1: : The framework of the “8 stages and 5 dimensions” of PN. 5-MTHF, 5-methyltetrahydrofolate; PN, precision nutrition. Survival needs are met through daily intake of sufficiently nutritious foods. Based on common sense judgment, widely available products such as multivitamins are utilized to meet the health requirements of the population. To meet the specific needs of minors, elderly, and pregnant women, any easily determined and corrected vitamin deficiencies are treated with corresponding nutrient products. This supplementation is prescribed based on existing clinical evidence or experience. To illustrate, we will describe an example of how observational and clinical evidence was used to identify populations that would benefit the most from folic acid supplementation for stroke risk reduction. A meta-analysis published by our team in The Lancet in 2007 showed that folic acid treatment significantly reduced the risk of stroke by 18%, and the effect was more prominent in populations from regions without folic acid fortification, where the risk of stroke was reduced by 25%.[23] Following the publication of our results, a reanalysis of the results of the famous Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation 2 (HOPE-2) study, with stroke as the endpoint, showed that folic acid and other B vitamins reduced the risk of stroke by 25%, and the effect of reducing the risk of stroke was greater for people with high homocysteine and living in non-folic acid fortified areas.[24] In 2015, JAMA published the results of the China Stroke Primary Prevention Trial (CSPPT), which provided evidence-based medical findings on the effectiveness of folic acid on stroke prevention.[25] The CSPPT was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial conducted in China. A total of 20,702 patients with hypertension were randomly assigned to receive enalapril and folic acid, 10.8 mg/day, or enalapril, 10 mg/day, alone, for a median of 4.5 years. The results showed that antihypertensive treatment with enalapril and folic acid significantly increased serum folate levels, reduced homocysteine levels, and significantly reduced the risk of first stroke by 21% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68–0.93). After the release of the CSPPT results, from 2016 to 2022, similar results were reported in various journals including J Am Coll Cardiol, The Lancet Neurol, and Neurology, among research teams from different countries and regions, and several meta-analyses of more than seven large international randomized controlled clinical trials on folic acid and stroke were published.[26–32] 4. Starting from the fourth stage, which is also the primary stage of precision nutrition, we begin to consider the five dimensions. As an example of the five dimensions at this stage: (1) Nutritional requirement dimension: based on different doses of nutrients. (2) Population characteristics dimension: the degree of nutrient deficiency varies from person to person. (3) Product dimension (taking folic acid as an example): different doses of folic acid products. (4) Test item dimension: assessing a single nutrient level. (5) Platform dimension: simple calculation of nutritional requirements. There are many indicators of folic acid deficiency or lack of dietary folic acid intake, including decreased serum folic acid levels, decreased red blood folic acid, increased serum homocysteine levels, bone marrow and other rapid proliferation tissue cell changes, as well as large, young erythrocyte anemia, etc.[33] Dietary investigation, laboratory biochemical detection, physical examination, clinical symptoms, and physical signs are the main means to comprehensively evaluate the condition of an individual’s folic acid levels. Common forms of evaluating the status of folic acid in the body are through detection of serum/plasma, red blood cells (RBC), and urine acid levels. Serum folate is an indicator of recent folate nutritional status, but serum folate alone cannot distinguish between transient dietary folate insufficiency and chronic folate deficiency. Red blood cell folate levels can reflect chronic or long-term folate nutritional status (within 4 months); thus, this method is more suitable for evaluating the effect of folic acid intervention.[34] The classic and most reliable method for folate measurement is the microbiological method (strongly recommended by the World Health Organization [WHO], quality in evidence).[35] The current, recommended, effective, and safe dose of folic acid supplementation in the general population is 0.4 to 1 mg daily.[36,37] It is important to note that long-term high-dose (>1 mg/day) folic acid supplementation (including folate-fortified foods) may pose health risks. For example, high doses have been found to increase the risk of certain cancers (such as colorectal cancer and prostate cancer), conceal the early manifestations of vitamin B12 deficiency, aggravate degenerative diseases of the nervous system, interfere with other drugs, affect the absorption of zinc, reduce the absorption rate of folic acid, and reduce immunity.[33,38] In a large and nationally representative, randomly selected sample of US adults, (NHANES 2011–2014), Liu et al first demonstrated that both low and high serum total folate levels (Q1: <26.1 nmol/L and Q4: ≥54.6 nmol/L) were associated with increased risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality.[39] Following folic acid treatment, the folic acid group was more likely to reach high folate levels, whereas the control group still had insufficient folate levels. This was also found in the Norwegian Vitamin (NORVIT) trial where folate levels were about 12 nmol/L in the control group and 65 nmol/L in the folic acid group.[40] The results of the Vitamin Intervention for Stroke Prevention (VISP) study showed that at 18 months, the mean level of plasma folate was more than 80 nmol/L in the high-dose formulation group, which received 2.5 mg/day of folic acid and was less than 30 nmol/L in the low-dose formulation group, which received 20 μg/day of folic acid.[41] In contrast, in the folate-fortified group of the CSPPT, folate levels rose from 18.1 to 45.1 nmol/L after 4.5 years of treatment, which was in the range of the lower NHANES folate-mortality risk group (Q2–Q3: 26.1–<54.6 nmol/L). Therefore, through the detection and simple calculation of folate levels, the appropriate dose of folic acid nutrient products can be adjusted to each population, achieving the basic premise of the primary stage of precision nutrition. 5. In the fifth stage, the five dimensions become more complex: (1) Nutrient requirement dimension: Based on genomics. (2) Population characteristics dimension: Genetic mutations affect nutrient absorption and metabolism. (3) Product dimension (taking folic acid as an example): Folic acid or 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (5-MTHF) (depending on genetics). (4) Dimension of test items: Single nutrient level + gene. (5) Platform dimension: Complex calculator, big data (10,000 +). 6. In the sixth stage, the five dimensions continue to evolve: (1) Nutritional requirement dimension: Based on living habits and physical conditions. (2) Population characteristics dimension: Smoking, alcohol abuse, or abnormal health conditions. (3) Product dimension (taking folic acid as an example): Folic acid or 5-MTHF (higher doses). (4) Dimension of test items: Single nutrient level + gene + liver and kidney function. (5) Platform dimension: AI (algorithm), Big data (100,000+). MTHFR is a key enzyme in the metabolic conversion of folic acid to its biologically active form, 5-MTHF. Populations with the mutated MTHFR 677 TT genotype show a 70% decrease in MTHFR enzyme activity compared to the wild-type CC genotype.[42] In the CSPPT, among those with the TT genotype, the benefit of folic acid supplementation was not significant for those with baseline plasma folate levels below 9.1 ng/mL, but was sufficient for those with high baseline plasma folate levels (>9.1 ng/mL).[25] Larger doses of folic acid may be necessary for those in the low-folate population with the TT genotype. Exactly how much larger the dose should be is an important question that has yet to be answered. The metabolism of folic acid in the body is affected by many factors; in addition to genetics (MTHFR C677T genotype),[43] physiology (age, sex), disease, medication and lifestyle (dietary folic acid intake, alcohol consumption), and other nutrient-related information should be taken into consideration when formulating a folic acid supplementation program (dosage, time, type, etc).[44] An analysis from the CSPPT found that there was an interaction between smoking and baseline folate levels on stroke.[45] After adjustment for confounding variables, the risk of stroke decreased with increasing baseline folate levels in nonsmokers (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.79–0.99; P = 0.043). For nonsmokers, high baseline folate was a protective factor for stroke. No such relationship was seen among smokers. Male smokers with hypertension required higher doses of folic acid to reduce the risk of stroke. Overall, among nonsmokers with folate deficiency, folic acid supplementation reduced the risk of stroke by 64%. However, among smokers with normal folate levels, folic acid supplementation lowered stroke risk by only 31%. The key advancement in the fifth and sixth stages is in concurrently evaluating the nutritional, metabolic, and genotype characteristics of people at high risk of diseases such as hypertension and stroke. Through greater understanding of the etiological mechanisms of nutritional metabolism and genetic susceptibility of related diseases, we enable the implementation of intelligent health management based on early nutritional screening, nutritional fortification and balance, and precision nutrition. 7. In the seventh stage, the five dimensions are considered as such: (1) Nutritional requirement dimension: Based on targeted metabolomics. (2) Population characteristics dimension: Metabolic disorders, abnormal indicators. (3) Product dimension (taking folic acid as an example): One-carbon metabolism nutrition: FA-B12-VD. (4) Dimension of test items: Multi-nutrient level + gene + liver and kidney function + single metabolomic marker. (5) Platform dimensions: AI (algorithm), big data (500,000+), cloud. 8. In the eighth stage, the five dimensions are considered as such: (1) Nutritional requirement dimension: Based on multi-targeted metabolomics. (2) Population characteristics: Multiple metabolic pathways display disruption, which manifests in abnormal indicators. (3) Product dimension (taking folic acid as an example): Simultaneous intervention of one-carbon metabolism and other metabolic pathways. (4) Dimension of test items: Comprehensive nutrient level + genes + liver and kidney function + multiple metabolomic markers. (5) Relying on platform dimensions: AI (algorithm), 5G+ communication, big data (1 million +), cloud, blockchain, ChatGPT. Nutrition metabolomics has emerged as an area of research that is at the intersection of basic nutrition and nutritional epidemiology.[46] Although a large amount of evidence has been accumulated from clinical and epidemiological studies, inconsistent or even conflicting results have been reported due to confounding from differences in populations, environments, lifestyles, nutritional levels, and other factors, suggesting that certain results and inferences are specific to a particular study population.[47] For example, serum/RBC folate and plasma total homocysteine are commonly used to evaluate folate status.[48,49] Individual folate status is related to multiple factors such as genetics, physiology, behavior (such as alcohol consumption, dietary folate, and related nutrient intake), diseases (such as gastrointestinal disorders), and drugs (antagonizing folate metabolism).[50,51] Therefore, a more comprehensive evaluation is needed. Future methodology will establish indicator sets/structural equations that can predict and identify abnormal folate metabolism and establish omics markers. In the foreseeable future, precision nutrition will provide accurate nutritional supplement products and disease prediction models as well as comprehensive, life-cycle health management programs through multi-targeted metabolomics, detection of total nutrient levels, and total nutrient gene screening, combined with artificial intelligence and machine learning. Precision nutrition is expected to promote the advancement of disease prevention, achieve zero-level prevention of chronic diseases, and promote health, lessening the burden on medical and social resources. Discussion Precision nutrition is a discipline that implements nutrition strategies that comprise the 8 stages and 5 dimensions framework and individual human characteristics to achieve health management, disease prevention, disease treatment, and health optimization. Precision nutrition is based on knowledge and understanding gained from multidisciplinary data from nutritional biology research, observational studies, and randomized controlled trials. At the same time, emerging and advanced omics technologies are helping to build powerful, personalized nutrition databases, and the combination of these methods and technologies can help us to better understand the potential impact of nutritional interventions on individuals and populations. The precision nutrition strategy presented here is designed to be implemented in a step-by-step fashion following the 8 stages and 5 dimensions to achieve the goals of health management, disease prevention, disease treatment, and health optimization. The development of various omics such as genome, transcriptome, metabolome, proteome, microbiome and big data analysis technology, provides great opportunities for the realization of precision nutrition and health policy. The combination of various analytical detection techniques, multiple omics disciplines, systems biology, and big data will greatly facilitate the discovery of novel biomarkers related to specific nutrients, or other dietary factors, for disease treatment.[52] Future research on precision nutrition based on omics will provide more precise dietary recommendations and nutritional intervention programs for the prevention and treatment of diseases. Our research team is actively carrying out the China Precision Nutrition and Health KAP real-world Study (CPNAS), which was officially launched in 2021. This study has the support and expertise of researchers from multidisciplinary backgrounds and with various professional associations such as clinical nutrition.[53] As precision nutrition research continues to develop, it is expected that more multidisciplinary collaborative teams in varying fields such as epidemiology, biology, medicine, and nutriomics (genomics, epigenetics, transcriptomics, proteomics, microbiome, and metabolomics) with a research focus on chronic diseases such as cancer, cardiovascular disease, and obesity, will emerge, providing a high-quality scientific basis and evidence-based findings for domestic and international standards. CPNAS is collecting and analyzing data on dietary habits, activity patterns, life behavior, and nutrition, to explore the physiological mechanism of diet nutrition and diseases, predict nutrition health outcomes, develop nutrition decision support algorithms, provide diet optimization, and obtain evidence-based findings using precision nutrition. Based on this protocol, our goal is to establish a comprehensive and dynamic precision nutrition solution for nutritional scientific assessment and intervention within China. We aim to reach the highest level of the 8 stages and 5 dimensions framework and achieve the goal of preventing diseases and improving health for all people. Funding The study was supported by funding from the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant nos. 2022YFC2009600, 2022YFC2009601), the Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of H-type Hypertension and Stroke Precision Prevention Research and Development Enterprise (grant no. 2020B121202010), Science, Technology and Innovation Committee of Shenzhen (grant nos. JSGG20201103153807021, KCXFZ20211020163801002), and the Development and Reform Commission of Shenzhen Municipality (grant no. XMHT20220104055). Conflicts of Interest YS and PC are employees of FOLATE Precision Nutrition Food Group, Shenzhen.