Linking the Paleoproterozoic Tectono-Magmatic Lull to the Archean Supercratons: Geochemical Insights from Paleoproterozoic Rocks in the North China Craton

Zhen-Xin Li,Shao-Bing Zhang,Yong-Fei Zheng,Ke Su,Liang Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2024.107326
IF: 3.8
2024-01-01
Precambrian Research
Abstract:A tectono-magmatic lull (TML) in the early Paleoproterozoic is indicated by the global geological record. However, the cause of the TML is still unclear. We have investigated a suite of amphibolites, dioritic dikes, and granitoids within this age range from the Taihua Complex in the southern part of the North China Craton. The amphibolites with protolith ages of ca. 2.34 Ga show arc-like trace element distribution patterns, high U/Th ratios, and moderately depleted to slightly enriched whole-rock Nd-Hf isotope and zircon Hf isotope compositions. These features suggest that the amphibolite protoliths originated from partial melting of the enriched mantle domains which were metasomatized by aqueous fluid. The ca. 2.27 Ga dioritic dikes exhibit arc-like trace element patterns, high Th/Yb ratios, and enriched zircon Hf isotope compositions. Such observations indicate that the dioritic dikes were derived from partial melting of the enriched mantle domains which were metasomatized by terrigenous sediment-derived hydrous melts. Compared to earlier mafic rocks, the Paleoproterozoic mafic magmas were produced under conditions of relatively lower temperature (T) and pressure (P). Nevertheless, their T/P ratios are higher than the earlier ones, suggesting the thinning of the lithospheric mantle. The ca. 2.33 Ga granites have chondritic whole-rock Nd-Hf isotopes, neutral zircon epsilon Hf(t) values, and high zircon saturation and high Ti-in-zircon temperatures, indicating their derivation from partial melting of the Archean crust at high temperature. Taken together, these magmatic activities record an event of fossil continental rifting during the TML. In combination with the reworked detrital zircon Hf isotope composition, the high T/P metamorphism, and the lower rate of plate motion, lithospheric extension is suggested to play a dominant role during the TML. It is noted that cratons with magmatism during the TML belong to the Sclavia or Nunavutia supercraton, which was active in the Paleoproterozoic. In contrast, those without magmatism during the TML belong to the Supervaalbara supercraton. In this regard, the intrinsic cause for the TML is the limited magmatism in response to the rifting of one supercraton but the stability of others.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?