Abstract:Although covalent interactions determine the primary structure of a molecule, the noncovalent interactions are responsible for the tertiary and quaternary structure of a molecule and create the fascinating world of the 3D architectures of biomacromolecules. For example, the double helical structure of DNA is of fundamental importance for the function of DNA: it allows it to store and transfer genetic information. To fulfill this role, the structure is rigid to maintain the double helix with a proper positioning of the complementary base, and floppy to allow for its opening. Very strong covalent interactions cannot fulfill both of these criteria, but noncovalent interactions, which are about 2 orders of magnitude weaker, can. This Account highlights the recent advances in the field of the design of novel wave function theory (WFT) methods applicable to noncovalent complexes ranging in size from less than 100 atoms, for which highly accurate ab initio methods are available, up to extended ones (several thousands atoms), which are the domain of semiempirical QM (SQM) methods. Accurate interaction energies for noncovalent complexes are generated by the coupled-cluster technique, taking single- and double-electron excitations iteratively and triple-electron excitation perturbatively with a complete basis set description (CCSD(T)/CBS). The procedure provides interaction energies with high accuracy (error less than 1 kcal/mol). Because the method is computationally demanding, its application is limited to complexes smaller than 30 atoms. But researchers would also like to use computational methods to determine these interaction energies accurately for larger biological and nanoscale structures. Standard QM methods such as MP2, MP3, CCSD, or DFT fail to describe various types of noncovalent systems (H-bonded, stacked, dispersion-controlled, etc.) with comparable accuracy. Therefore, novel methods are needed that have been parametrized toward noncovalent interactions, and existing benchmark data sets represent an important tool for the development of new methods providing reliable characteristics of noncovalent clusters. Our laboratory developed the first suitable data set of CCSD(T)/CBS interaction energies and geometries of various noncovalent complexes, called S22. Since its publication in 2006, it has frequently been applied in parametrization and/or verification of various wave function and density functional techniques. During the intense use of this data set, several inconsistencies emerged, such as the insufficient accuracy of the CCSD(T) correction term or its unbalanced character, which has triggered the introduction of a new, broader, and more accurate data set called the S66 data set. It contains not only 66 CCSD(T)/CBS interaction energies determined in the equilibrium geometries but also 1056 interaction energies calculated at the same level for nonequilibrium geometries. The S22 and S66 data sets have been used for the verification of various WFT methods, and the lowest RMSE (S66, in kcal/mol) was found for the recently introduced SCS-MI-CCSD/CBS (0.08), MP2.5/CBS (0.16), MP2.X/6-31G* (0.27), and SCS-MI-MP2/CBS (0.38) methods. Because of their computational economy, the MP2.5 and MP2.X/6-31G* methods can be recommended for highly accurate calculations of large complexes with up to 100 atoms. The evaluation of SQM methods was based only on the S22 data set, and because some of these methods have been parametrized toward the same data set, the respective results should be taken with caution. For really extended complexes such as protein-ligand systems, only the SMQ methods are applicable. After adding the corrections to the dispersion energy and H-bonding, several methods exhibit surprisingly low RMSE (even below 0.5 kcal/mol). Among the various SMQ methods, the PM6-DH2 can be recommended because of its computational efficiency and it can be used for optimization (which is not the case for other SQM methods). The PM6-DH2 is the base of our novel scoring function used in in silico drug design.

Chemical accuracy for ligand-receptor binding Gibbs energies through multi-level SQM/QM calculations

Chemical accuracy for ligand-receptor binding Gibbs energies through multi-level SQM/QM calculations

Improving the accuracy of predicting protein-ligand binding-free energy with semiempirical quantum chemistry charge.

Quick-and-Easy Validation of Protein–Ligand Binding Models Using Fragment-Based Semi-Empirical Quantum Chemistry

Biomolecular conformational changes and ligand binding: from kinetics to thermodynamics.

Meta-Analysis Reveals That Absolute Binding Free-Energy Calculations Approach Chemical Accuracy

Calculations on noncovalent interactions and databases of benchmark interaction energies

On achieving high accuracy and reliability in the calculation of relative protein–ligand binding affinities

Formal Estimation of Errors in Computed Absolute Interaction Energies of Protein-Ligand Complexes

Accurate protein-ligand binding free energy estimation using QM/MM on multi-conformers predicted from classical mining minima

Use of QM/MM scheme to reproduce macromolecule-small molecule noncovalent binding energy

SQM2.20: Semiempirical quantum-mechanical scoring function yields DFT-quality protein–ligand binding affinity predictions in minutes

How accurate is the description of ligand–protein interactions by a hybrid QM/MM approach?

Quantum Mechanical Calculation of Noncovalent Interactions: A Large-Scale Evaluation of PMx, DFT, and SAPT Approaches

The SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge: assessing the reliability and efficiency of binding free energy calculations

Towards chemical accuracy for alchemical free energy calculations with hybrid physics-based machine learning / molecular mechanics potentials

Automated Fragmentation QM/MM Calculation of NMR Chemical Shifts for Protein-Ligand Complexes.

Validation of the Alchemical Transfer Method for the Estimation of Relative Binding Affinities of Molecular Series

Accuracy and precision of binding free energy prediction for a tacrine related lead inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase with an arsenal of supercomputerized molecular modelling methods: a comparative study

Accurate Calculation of Relative Binding Free Energies Between Ligands with Different Net Charges

Receptor Thermodynamics of Ligand–Receptor or Ligand–Enzyme Association