Abstract:<div> The announced goal of reversing the European trend toward a declining land carbon sink has garnered much ink. Words can, however, be misleading. Annual additions/contributions (sinks) to the land carbon sink (stocks) from growing forest and increasing forest cover have slowed marginally in recent years. However, the existing European land forest sink (stocks) has (have) expanded continuously across most or all of the 20th century and on into the 21st. More importantly perhaps, EU Member states with significant long-term investments in the forestry sector have historically witnessed strong forest expansion and notmerely with the initiation of international attention to climate change mitigation through the UNFCCC negotiating and climate commitment framework. In this context, frequent assaults on forestry from multiple directions are cause for some bewilderment. We first highlight weaknesses in claims of increased forest use intensity and illustrate that forestry in the Nordic countries has a remarkably small and stable footprint over the 20th and 21st centuries. Addressing the second problem, however, understanding why such attacks occur in the first place, is more complex. Methodologically speaking, challenges to forestry should presumably be balanced by an understanding of the many human welfare benefits forests and the practice of forestry currently provide, as well as the costs of relinquishing those practices. Perhaps due to strong preferences among NGO&#8217;s and in parts of the academic community for natural, untouched, biodiverse forests, the benefits of forestry and forest resource use are consistently under-appreciated. Striking a balance between the desire for natural and biodiverse-rich forest environments on the one hand, and the climate change mitigation (and adaptation) benefits of forestry, forest resource use and substitution on the other is presumably a political and socio-economic necessity. The real question may be to what extent bias in favor of the &#8220;natural&#8221; may ultimately disrupt real, measurable progress toward effective climate change mitigation? Continuous, positive mitigation-related contributions to the growing European land cover sink (stocks), as well as to the global carbon budget (through annual net removals and substitution), have been and should remain the norm. These goals ultimately require an aggressive EU LULUCF strategy capable of fully mobilizing forest and forest resource use in favor of the goal of climate change mitigation (and adaptation). </div>

Convergence or Divergence? Unraveling the Global Development Pattern of Forest Carbon Sink

Club convergence of sustainable development: fresh evidence from developing and developed countries

Decoupling of Provincial Energy-Related CO2 Emissions from Economic Growth in China and Its Convergence from 1995 to 2017

Spatial convergence and differentiation characteristics of ecological efficiency of forestry carbon sink: Evidence from China

Possibilities for mitigating the Matthew effect in low-carbon development: Insights from convergence analysis

Convergence of clubs between per capita carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels and cement production

Spatial Convergence of Carbon Productivity: Theoretical Analysis and Chinese Experience.

The impact of globalization on the ecological footprint: do convergence clubs matter?

Recent divergence in the contributions of tropical and boreal forests to the terrestrial carbon sink

Does biomass material footprint converge? Evidence from club convergence analysis

Variations of Carbon Allocation and Turnover Time Across Tropical Forests

Reversing the European Trend Toward a Declining Land Carbon Sink?

Rapid turnover of connexin43 in the adult rat heart.

Carbon Benefits from Forest Transitions Promoting Biomass Expansions and Thickening

Does corporate carbon performance converge in the global market? Evidence from a distribution dynamic approach

Can forests realize the carbon neutrality dream? Evidence from a global sample

Comparative analysis of forest soil carbon sink and source based on bibliometrics: Development, hotspots, and trends

Sustainable Growth Drivers: Unveiling the Role Played by Carbon Productivity

Differences in carbon sink potential between urban agglomerations are decreasing: Evidence from China

The convergence characteristics of China's carbon intensity: Evidence from a dynamic spatial panel approach

Which Provinces Will Be the Beneficiaries of Forestry Carbon Sink Trade? A Study on the Carbon Intensity–Carbon Sink Assessment Model in China