Nitrogen and Energy Utilization and Methane Emissions of Sheep Grazing on Annual Pasture Vs. Native Pasture.

Kaili Xie,Fuyao Liu,Cheng Zhang,Fujiang Hou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skae032
2024-01-01
Journal of Animal Science
Abstract:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the differences in annual pasture and native pasture on dry matter (DM) intake, nutrient digestibility, nitrogen (N) and energy utilization, and methane (CH4) emission of grazing sheep, and to provide the basis for rational livestock grazing in salinized regions. The study used 10 male Hu sheep female x thin-tailed Han sheep male rams (20 +/- 5 kg) aged 5 mo. Sheep grazing was conducted in annual pasture and native pasture using a 2 x 2 Latin square design. After a 15-d adaptation period for grazing, the digestion and metabolism experiment of sheep were conducted, while CH4 emissions were measured using sulfur hexafluoride tracer gas. DM intake did not differ between annual pasture and native pasture (P = 0.386). Meanwhile, the digestibility of DM (P < 0.001), neutral detergent fiber (P < 0.001), acid detergent fiber (P < 0.01), crude protein (P < 0.001), and ether extract (P < 0.001) of sheep grazing on native pasture was significantly higher than that of annual pasture. Sheep grazing on native pasture had increased N intake (P < 0.001) and N retained (P < 0.001) compared with those grazing on annual pasture. Digestion energy (P < 0.05) and metabolic energy (P < 0.01) of sheep grazing on annual pasture were significantly improved compared with those on native pasture, while fecal energy (P < 0.001), urine energy (P < 0.001) and CH4 energy (CH4-E) output (P < 0.001) and CH(4)emission (P < 0.001) of sheep grazing on annual pasture were significantly decreased. The CH4-E/gross energy (GE) values of sheep grazing on annual pasture and native pasture were 0.09 and 0.10, respectively. In conclusion, grazing sheep have higher N utilization on native pasture, whereas grazing sheep have higher energy utilization and low CH4 emissions in annual pasture. In conclusion, annual pasture has a lower CH4-E/GE compared to native pasture, which helps in reducing environmental pollution. The reduction of methane (CH4) emissions and nitrogen (N) excretion from livestock production systems can help mitigate environmental impact and improve feeding efficiency. The energy requirements of livestock are crucial for enhancing their performance and minimizing environmental impact. It is imperative to accurately ascertain the N and energy efficiency, and CH4 emissions associated with sheep grazing across diverse grassland ecosystems to optimize forage resource utilization without compromising livestock production performance, thereby facilitating sustainable grassland management and grazing practices. Sheep grazing on native pasture had higher nutrient digestibility and N utilization, while sheep grazing on annual pasture showed higher energy utilization and less CH4 emissions. CH4-energy/gross energy for grazing sheep on annual pasture and native pasture was 0.09 and 0.10, respectively. This study assessed the differences in N and energy utilization and CH4 emissions, among sheep grazing on different grasses, providing data support for the development of more rational livestock grazing methods.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?