Re. Emulating a Target Trial of Interventions Initiated During Pregnancy With Healthcare Databases: The Example of COVID-19 Vaccination

Chase D. Latour,Jacob C. Kahrs,Elyse M. Miller,Kimi Van Wickle,Mollie E. Wood
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ede.0000000000001686
2024-01-31
Epidemiology
Abstract:Hernández-Díaz et al. 1 provide a comprehensive extension of the target trial framework to study the effects of point exposures during pregnancy. The authors note that, because treatment is not assigned, immortal time bias is possible if the start of follow-up is not aligned for the treated and untreated groups. The authors propose a series of target trials at each gestational week, matching treated and untreated individuals on baseline confounders. Both members of the matched pair are artificially censored when either member is nonadherent to treatment. Because untreated individuals may opt for treatment later, but treated individuals cannot opt for nontreatment, this censoring only occurs in response to postbaseline nonadherence by the untreated person. Censoring the pair is sufficient to estimate a per protocol effect if the treatment effect is homogeneous across predictors of censoring, but not otherwise. Given that baseline matching removes matched observations but not bias due to time-varying censoring, the advantages of artificial censoring in this application are unclear.
public, environmental & occupational health
What problem does this paper attempt to address?