Alain Badiou’s Wittgenstein’s Antiphilosophy

Michael A. Peters

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2019.1644500

2019-01-01

Educational Philosophy and Theory

Abstract:I think that all three [Nietzsche, Wittgenstein, Lacan] – but Nietzsche’s case is without doubt the most dramatic – in the last instance sacrificed themselves for philosophy. There is in antiphilos...

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Alain Badiou and Education

Torill Strand

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.1457

2020-12-17

Abstract:The French philosopher Alain Badiou (1937–) is one of the most significant philosophers of our time, well known for his meticulous work on rethinking, renewing, and thereby strengthening philosophy as an academic discipline. In short, his philosophy seeks to reveal and make sense of the potential of radical innovations in, or transformations of, any given situation. Although he has not written extensively on education, the pedagogical theme is vital, constitutive, and ongoing throughout his work. Badiou is an outspoken critic of the analytic and postmodern schools of thought, as he strongly promotes the virtue of curiosity, and prospects of “an education by truths.” “Truths” are not to be confused with matters of knowledge or opinion. Truths are existential, ongoing, and open-ended ontological operations that do not belong to any epistemic category. An education by such truths operates through a subtraction from the state of the situation and proposes a different direction regarding the true life. According to Badiou, the task of philosophy is to think these truths as processes that emerge from and pursue gradually transformations of particular situations. Overall, the structure of Badiou’s philosophical system demonstrates an extraordinary ontological style as it concurrently stands in relation to, and breaks off from, the history of contemporary French philosophy, German Idealism, and Greek antiquity. His system, which is of vast complexity, is based on mathematical set theory, consisting of a series of determinate negations of the history of philosophy, and also created by the histories of what Badiou terms philosophy’s conditions: science, art, politics, and love.
Alain Badiou, the Communist Horizon Beyond Violence. An Exploratory Look at the 21st Century

Nicol A. Barria-Asenjo,Willingthon Acuña Echagüe,Jamadier Uribe Muñoz,Jairo Gallo Acosta,Simone A. Medina Polo,Alberto León,Silvia Kargodorian,Antonio Letelier,Jesús Ayala-Colqui

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21500/22563202.6447

2023-07-14

Revista Guillermo de Ockham

Abstract:This research paper examines the work of philosopher Alain Badiou and his analysis of 20th-century violence. The author argues that the last century was marked by violence and destruction, from world wars to extermination camps and state crimes. Badiou claims that this violence stems from a passion for the real, a quest to transform existing reality and create a new world. However, this passion clashes with reality itself, creating an irreducible difference between the real and constructed reality. This difference is what allows us to understand the phenomenon of violence. The passion for the real seeks to purify it and unmask the superficiality of reality, but it can never fully achieve its goal. Furthermore, this passion for the real creates constant mistrust of semblances, leading to suspicion and persecution. The totalitarian violence of the 20th century arises from this infinite suspicion directed towards semblances. The article explores in detail the relationship between the passion for the real, violence, and the distance between the real and semblances.
Las matemáticas como respuesta al reto de la antifilosofía en Alain Badiou

Carlos A Garduño Comparán

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48102/rdf.v54i153.147

2022-07-01

Revista de Filosofía Universidad Iberoamericana

Abstract:En este texto se discuten los principales desarrollos de Alain Badiou en cuanto a las aportaciones de las matemáticas a una ontología materialista de lo múltiple, desde una perspectiva platónica; a través de éstas Badiou pretende enfrentar el reto que implica la antifilosofía de Jacques Lacan. Posteriormente, con base en la crítica que Slavoj Žižek realiza a las nociones de presentación y representación de Badiou, se juzgan los límites y las posibilidades de su propuesta ontológica.
Against instinctual reason: Alain Badiou on the disinterested interest of truth procedures in the post-truth era

Nusret Sinan Evcan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-021-00470-4

2021-02-10

Contemporary Political Theory

Abstract:According to Alain Badiou, truth's existence is not dependent upon philosophy because philosophy itself is not a creator of truth. Badiouan thought submits philosophy to the universe of truth through the mediation of truth procedures. Badiou names these procedures love, politics, art and science. In contrast, the instinctual reason of democratic materialism, which Badiou defines as the partnership between parliamentary democracy and neo-liberal pragmatism, replaces love with physical beauty, politics with technical power, art with a marketable talent and science with a competitive genius. These replacements also correspond to post-truth. This article contrasts the concept of "disinterested interest" in Badiou's truth procedures with "self-interest" reigning over democratic materialism's reality procedures. Following Badiou, I explain how "self-interested interest" reproduces the human-animal's instinctual reason, which triggers post-truth politics. Commitment to truth in a post-truth era therefore cannot be sustained by appealing to democratic materialism's manipulated knowledge but must be guided by disinterested interest. The article argues that knowledge cannot be an antidote to post-truth because democratic materialism often uses knowledge as an instrument or sometimes as a control mechanism, to strengthen the position of post-truth in many circumstances.

political science
Genealogy Of Morality And Phenomenology Of Moral Consciousness

Ni Liang-kang

2013-01-01

Abstract:F. Nietzsche's thought of the genealogy of morality is the unusual voice in his age. Whereas today, though in a morass of internal contradictions, it represents a kind of general orientation of moral evaluation. But Nietzsche's genealogy of morality is merely a lead-in in this article, the author hopes that in the very end it could bring out a characterization of the phenomenological work of moral consciousness. No matter whether E. von Hartmann's phenomenology of moral consciousness belongs to real descriptive analysis of phenomenology of moral consciousness or not, we can at least try to formulate a few fundamental properties of the phenomenological work of moral consciousness.
Four Key Concepts and Their Intentions in Nietzsche's Advanced Thought

Yong-yin LI

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-3571.2016.03.008

2016-01-01

Abstract:Nietzsche's advanced thought is mainly embodied in the Will to Power which is synthesized by several notes.Through the investigation of the will of power,Nietzsche emphasizes the significance of the revaluation of the living value.In Nietzsche's opinion,"Nihilism"implies suspecting the old value and exploring the new one and anti-moral or immoral is not to deny all the morals but to affirm Dionysus spirit through the negation of the values of Christianity and Buddhism.Ultimately,Nietzsche establishes the in-ner relationship beween artistic creation and living will,which regards the artistic free survival as the aes-thetic expression of the survival will.
Wittgenstein, Hegel And Cognition

Tom Rockmore

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110572780-007

2019-01-01

Abstract:Philosophy is often thought to deal with problems, enigmas or conundra it seeks to answer, for instance through a theory. Wittgenstein and Hegel both challenge this view in different ways. Wittgenstein can be understood as passing through two main phases. In an initial phase, he proposes a view that presupposes a conception of language he later rejects. In a later phase, he rejects his earlier theory and philosophy in all its forms. In other words, after the effective refutation of what he earlier thought was the only approach, he drew the conclusion that there was no longer any possibly valid approach. This suggests the only possible result is skepticism, not about knowledge but rather about philosophy as a source of knowledge. In this sense, Wittgenstein suggests that in his later thought he brings philosophy to a skeptical end. In comparison to Wittgenstein, Hegel has a less extreme view. He neither claims to formulate the only possible approach to knowledge, hence to bring the tradition to an end, nor that philosophy ends in skepticism. He rather vindicates the Parmenidean approach that we are justified in claiming to know that knowledge is possible within the limits of the identity of thought and being.
Edmund Husserl’s Political Praxis and Theoretical Reflections During World War I

Ni Liangkang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3868/s030-003-014-0020-3

2014-01-01

Abstract:Husserl the philosopher personally experienced World War I breaking out 100 years ago. Like most German and Austrian commoners, at the initial stage of the war, Husserl was extremely passionate for it. After undergoing the cruelty of war and losing many relatives and friends, he was once enmeshed in extreme confusion and disappointment, albeit he still made every effort to offer spiritual and ethical support to the soldiers at the front. Along with the proceeding of the war, he soon changed his views with respect to this war and confessed that more and deeper reflections were needed to address issues about problems of nationality, super-national ethics and about problems of wars relevant to them. He made philosophical theoretical reflections with regard to this war after it ended, and presented, eventually, requirements for himself: to be satisfied with taking the possibility of the practical activities of philosophy as the topic of philosophical theoretical study and to give up, in drastic fashion, the intention in such philosophical practices as providing political proposals and exerting political influences, “living purely as a scientific philosopher.”
The subject of literature, the subject of philosophy: Plato, Wittgenstein, and Kierkegaard's reading of Abraham

Kenneth Dauber

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/phin.12424

2024-06-11

Philosophical Investigations

Abstract:Though Plato, famously, had Socrates ban the poets from his republic while Wittgenstein seems to aspire to a style of philosophical writing that approaches the literary, there is a troubling similarity between them in their elision of the self as a self. Saying what he means in the mode of the philosopher or meaning what he says in the mode of the poet, how can the self both be and say itself? The misprision of Abraham's binding of Isaac in the thinking of Kierkegaard, who with Plato was one of Wittgenstein's favourite philosophers, is a telling opening into the question of the self in its responsibilities and its discontents.
Ethics and morality, principles and practice

M. J. B. Stokhof

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42048-018-0016-x

2018-01-01

Zeitschrift für Ethik und Moralphilosophie

Abstract:The paper addresses the tension in Wittgenstein’s work between an absolute and a more contextual approach to values. It argues that both are relevant, but that from a systematic point of view the contextual perspective has priority. The consequent commitment to a form of moral realism is discussed, and an analogy with normativity in the domain of language is adduced to provide further support.
Homo Philosophicus: Reflections on the Nature and Function of Philosophical Thought

Said Mikki

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies6030077

2021-01-01

Philosophies

Abstract:The philosopher is a fundamental mode of existence of the human being, yet it is experienced only by a minority, an elite. Those constitute, among themselves, a subspecies of Homo sapiens that is sometimes dubbed Homo philosophicus. Our goal here is to investigate, in depth, the philosophical foundations of this ontological-anthropological concept. We analyze the concept of the philosopher into three basic components: the thinker, the artist, and the mathematician, arguing that the three fundamentally participate in maintaining the operation of the philosopher machine. The following text can be considered a contribution to metaphilosophy, written as a structured opinion piece, encompassing a series of reflections drawn from the writer's own experience as a philosopher. The mode of the presentation is a mixture of personal and experimental writing styles, intentionally avoiding the rigid form of overtly analytical and argumentative discussions. Although numerous philosophers will be discussed below, four key figures, Nietzsche, Russell, Heidegger, and Guattari, occupy a special position in our overall opinionated view on the nature of philosophy.
"German Matador" and French Philosophy: About the Identity of French Philosophy from the Point of View of National Language

Wang Liping

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-3492.2007.05.007

2007-01-01

Abstract:According Heidegger,the crisis of modern philosophy is mostly caused by a kind of "philosophical romanity"(romanité philosophique),which made the western philosophy forget its real sources in ancient Greece and misguided it by accepting the cultures of Rome-Latin.Heidegger thinks that philosophy is essentially connected with the essence of language,and only German has the real close relationship with ancient Greek,so the western philosophy can only "say" German.So according to this,we need to ask if the declaration of " French philosophy" is still legal in its identity? In this article,we try to prove: 1) In the history of language in Europe,German is not closer to Greek than the languages of Latin family including French;2) Return to the Thought of ancient Greece only by ascending to its origin is just a wrong way;3) No any national language could monopolize the philosophy;4) French as a national language has its great character which is very special and helpful for building the unique identity of French philosophy.
Badiou's Study on the Way of Human Existence—— from the Perspective of Radical Political Philosophy

Jian LI

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2018.02.006

2018-01-01

Abstract:Under the influence of the Western Marxism,Badiou who represents the French left expressed his radical position in the attitude of returning to event-subj ect-truth philosophy under the new historical stage.In this philosophy,the existing way of humans becomes the core of his thinking.There are three main points as the point of penetration:The first one is to criticize capitalism and uncover the hypocrisy of capitalist democracy in order to highlight the subj ect status of humans.The second is to realize a role transition from the spectator to the creator in order to illustrate the people's initiative under the perspective of the event-subj ect-truth.The last is to take the goal of radical political philosophy as the realization of human freedom and all-around development in order to demonstrate the greatest respect to humans.It is in this interlocking thought that Badiou has stated his ideas of communism by seeking the way of human existence,eventually paving the way for his radical political philosophy.
Philosophy is the Revolutionary Weapon——Althusser's Views of Philosophy

ZHU Xiao-hui

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2529.2008.02.007

2008-01-01

Abstract:Althusser is a both philosopher and Marxist.His thoughts changed several times in his whole life.However,he persisted in that philosophy combined with Marxist politics all the time.Early years of his life he was a Hegelian and then he became a Marxist.In 1960s he put forwardphilosophy is basically politics.The old age he exploredEncounter Materialism by Chance.All he had done indicated his standpoint of political philosophy: the philosophy as a revolutionary weapon.
Reevaluating Nietzsche's Philosophy

Zhao Dunhua

2013-01-01

Abstract:This essay classifies Nietzsche's aphorisms in different books into scientific,philosophical,moral and religious reevaluations,and interprets aphorisms on "superman" and "eternal recurrence" as two major themes of his positive nihilism.Based upon understanding his works,the essay adopts the reevaluating attitude towards Nietzsche's philosophy itself,pointing out its danger in arousing the primitive instinct of ancient Aryans' warriors and smashing the moral force suppressing that instinct.
Levinas, Literature, and Philosophy

Seán Hand

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190455934.013.51

2019-01-08

Abstract:This chapter explores posthumously published poems and fragments of novels by Levinas. It shows how seriously Levinas considered abandoning philosophy at a key moment in favor of writing novels. It examines how this calls into question some of Levinas’s positions regarding literature in the postwar period. It looks at how the thematics of his artistic plans conflict with ethical postulations in his major works. It traces relations between these plans and the work of key influential writers like Blanchot. It considers how these novelististic experiments recast Levinas’s essays on aesthetics. And it reflects on how knowledge of this work by Levinas must now inform our appreciation of his philosophical publications.
The Enduring Importance of Roman Ingarden for Reception Theory

Michael Raubach

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12797/9788381383936.04

2021-01-01

Abstract:There have been few philosophers in the 20th century more creative and profound and yet more obscure than Roman Ingarden. He anticipated many of the major philosophical questions that would dominate literary theory in the 1960s and 70s in Germany, France, and the United States. In this paper, I argue that his primary contribution to literary theory is an ontology that arcs deftly between the poles of idealism and realism with a nuanced way of upholding both the formal reality of the literary work of art and the subjective assessment of aesthetic value, all the while preserving the fundamental meaning-making function of language. It was this philosophical foundation that proved to be a fertile ground for later philosophers, like Hans Robert Jauss and Wolfgang Iser, who wanted to push back on what they saw as analogous forces to idealism and realism in the rigidity of formalism and Marxist materialism and the ostensible epistemological nihilism of the psychological hermeneutics.
Friedrich Nietzsche-A Theoretician of Modern Democracy

E. Kiss

2001-09-22

Abstract:The deeper one penetrates into various aspects of Nietzsche's political philosophy, the clearer it becomes that Nietzsche's political philosophy `merits' reconstruction not only in broad historical terms. In other words, if we succeed in understanding the political perspectivism of Nietzsche's ideas, we might also be able to contribute substantially to the received canon of political philosophy. An immediate question--which nonetheless defies an ultimate answer--is why only today does. Nietzschean philosophy present itself as a significant paradigm of political theory? At first, it seems not impossible to give an answer by pointing to the politically-motivated expropriation which the whole of Nietzsche's philosophy repeatedly fell victim to. Tendentious interpretations have often amounted to straightforward falsification. (Paradoxically, what the authors of these insidious attempts have mostly been attracted by were not the specifically political components of Nietzsche's thought. Politically-motivated interest in such notions as `The Will to Power' or the `Eternal Return' has played a much more significant role than the Nietzschean critique of modern etatism, for instance.) I do not intend to develop or return to my previously expressed views on expropriations of Nietzsche's philosophy, though these expropriations are in many cases without doubt `diabolically' sophisticated. In the following paper, I am going to focus exclusively on the hermeneutical problem of the currency of Nietzsche's political philosophy. I have already touched upon a superficial aspect of this problem: the crude and totalitarian misinterpretations of Nietzsche's philosophy. Essentially, however, the problem is of a hermeneutical nature. This is because the actual consequences of the misinterpretations (in their given historical and systematic contexts) have placed Nietzsche's political philosophy in a specific hermeneutical space. That is to say, they have re-contextualized Nietzsche's explicitly articulated texts. Thus not independently from the falsifications, but also not purely as a result of them, a hermeneutical situation has been created in which Nietzschean ideas could no longer be apprehended as embodying a full-blown and legitimate paradigm of political philosophy. The real hermeneutical phenomenon at issue here could therefore be defined as a thoroughgoing change in the conditions of theoretical perception making the correct apprehension of a paradigm hermeneutically impossible. The decisive influence of Marxism on political philosophy has certainly played an important role in this peculiar modification of the conditions of theoretical apprehension. This is because the real Nietzschean paradigm has necessarily appeared as `prior to Marx' and thus as a historical, if not even as an antiquated attempt. Since the Marxist paradigm itself has begun to fall into pieces, however, the Nietzschean paradigm of political philosophy could shake off both the fatal consequences of falsifications and the secondary role assigned to it due to the dominance of the Marxist paradigm. (In fact, this claim remains true irrespective of the actual theory one chooses to identify the Marxist paradigm with. Neither does it presuppose value-judgements with regard to the decline of the Marxist paradigm.) The contribution of the collapse of the Marxist paradigm to revitalizing Nietzsche's political philosophy can also be grasped in more concrete terms. The Marxist paradigm can be basically seen as a holistic political (and sociological) agenda founded on the notion of class-struggle. This thesis can be formulated with a reasonable degree of certainty, although power-oriented Bonapartism-theory has offered an alternative within Marxism itself, or at least, it has made significant contributions towards a more refined political theory. By contrast, Nietzsche's political philosophy, his theory of democracy in particular, rests on a notion of society located within the conceptual framework of the sociology of knowledge and culture (even if Nietzsche's political philosophy does not ignore the symptoms of crisis recognized by Marx's political philosophy of the class-struggle). …

Sociology,Philosophy,Political Science
The Underground Current of the Idealism of Problems

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22394/0869-5377-2020-4-1-10

2020-01-01

Philosophical Literary Journal Logos

Abstract:The article deals with the fundamental influence on Deleuze of the little-studied strain of French philosophy and epistemology from the 20th century that deals with such concepts as question, theme and problem. Some figures adjoining this lineage are known outside France (Bergson, Bachelard, Canguilhem, Althusser, Foucault), and others are just beginning to arouse intense interest (Lautman, Ruyer, Simondon); but they have rarely been seen as part of a single tradition of theorizing about problematics. And in spite of the fact (or thanks to it) that thinking about problematics has nominally entered the mainstream of the contemporary academy as a principal methodological basis, its actual current remains unknown and underground. The author offers a brief analysis of Martial Gueroult’s dianoematics. Dianoematics is a structuralist approach to the history of philosophy which consists of two parts: the history of the history of philosophy and the philosophy of the history of philosophy. Gueroult regards the latter as a transcendental science, one which takes philosophy (or, more precisely, the multiplicity of philosophies or problematics) and the conditions of its possibility as its subject. When philosophies lay claim to timeless truth about Real, this inoculates them against any reduction to the pure subjectivity of thinkers or the social circumstances of their thinking. And so Gueroult postulates that the philosophical choices which ground philosophies have their own unitary ahistorical logic. That unity of logic, however, does not reduce the multitude of philosophies to one. Therefore, in place of a single Real there is a multiplicity of Reals which are internal to philosophies — that is the so-called “radical idealism” of Gueroult. The author points out the interplay between Gueroult’s approach not only with the history of philosophy from What Is Philosophy? but also with Laruelle’s non-philosophy, with which Deleuze carries on a dialogue in his book. While Deleuze tries to “sublate” Gueroult’s idealism by taking it as a positive basis for materialist thought regarding immanence, Laruelle takes it as the clearest expression of the idealism inherent in all philosophies and uses it negatively as a building material for non-philosophy.
On Wittgenstein's philosophy of mathematics

Joel Merker

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0801.1066

2008-01-08

Abstract:Mathematics cannot anymore be assimilated to a linguistic game, where formal proofs are strongly differentiated with conjectural thinking, without building any category of knowledge to understand the passage (Wittgenstein's gist). Nowadays, philosophy has to face with the growing, exponential ramified tree of speculative mathematical thinking. Our main (problematical) theses are: 1. In mathematics, there is no empirical automatism, and no separate, physical-like motricity. 2: The irreversible-synthetical must force to complexify the exegetical game of philosophy; numerical experiments in algebra and in number theory are a kind of letting blow up all possible problems; 4. The nature of mathematical questioning still remains in question.

History and Overview

Alain Badiou’s Wittgenstein’s Antiphilosophy

Alain Badiou and Education

Alain Badiou, the Communist Horizon Beyond Violence. An Exploratory Look at the 21st Century

Las matemáticas como respuesta al reto de la antifilosofía en Alain Badiou

Against instinctual reason: Alain Badiou on the disinterested interest of truth procedures in the post-truth era

Genealogy Of Morality And Phenomenology Of Moral Consciousness

Four Key Concepts and Their Intentions in Nietzsche's Advanced Thought

Wittgenstein, Hegel And Cognition

Edmund Husserl’s Political Praxis and Theoretical Reflections During World War I

The subject of literature, the subject of philosophy: Plato, Wittgenstein, and Kierkegaard's reading of Abraham

Ethics and morality, principles and practice

Homo Philosophicus: Reflections on the Nature and Function of Philosophical Thought

"German Matador" and French Philosophy: About the Identity of French Philosophy from the Point of View of National Language

Badiou's Study on the Way of Human Existence—— from the Perspective of Radical Political Philosophy

Philosophy is the Revolutionary Weapon——Althusser's Views of Philosophy

Reevaluating Nietzsche's Philosophy

Levinas, Literature, and Philosophy

The Enduring Importance of Roman Ingarden for Reception Theory

Friedrich Nietzsche-A Theoretician of Modern Democracy

The Underground Current of the Idealism of Problems

On Wittgenstein's philosophy of mathematics