Abstract:It has been shown recently that the anomalies observed in \( \overline{B}\to {D}^{\left(*\right)}\tau {\overline{\nu}}_{\tau } \) and \( \overline{B}\to \overline{K}{\ell}^{+}{\ell}^{-} \) decays could be resolved with just one scalar leptoquark. Fitting to the current data on R(D(∗)) along with acceptable q 2 distributions in \( \overline{B}\to {D}^{\left(\ast \right)}\tau {\overline{\nu}}_{\tau } \) decays, four best-fit solutions for the operator coefficients have been found. In this paper, we explore the possibilities of how to discriminate these four solutions. Firstly, we find that two of them are already excluded by the decay \( {B}_c^{-}\to {\tau}^{-}{\overline{\nu}}_{\tau } \), because the predicted decay widths have already overshot the total width ΓBc . It is then found that the remaining two solutions result in two effective Hamiltonians governing \( b\to c\tau {\overline{\nu}}_{\tau } \) transition, which differ by a sign and enhance the absolute value of the coefficient of \( {\overline{c}}_L{\gamma}_{\mu }{b}_L{\overline{\tau}}_L{\gamma}^{\mu }{\nu}_{\tau\ L} \) operator by about 12%. However, they give nearly the same predictions as in the SM for the D ∗ and τ longitudinal polarizations as well as the lepton forward-backward asymmetries in \( \overline{B}\to {D}^{\left(\ast \right)}\tau {\overline{\nu}}_{\tau } \) decays. For the other observables like \( \mathrm{\mathcal{B}}\left({B}_c^{-}\to {\tau}^{-}{\overline{\nu}}_{\tau}\right),\mathrm{\mathcal{B}}\left({B}_c^{-}\to \gamma {\tau}^{-}{\overline{\nu}}_{\tau}\right),{R}_{D\left(\ast \right)}\left({q}^2\right),\ \mathrm{d}\mathrm{\mathcal{B}}\left(\overline{B}\to {D}^{\left(\ast \right)}\tau {\overline{\nu}}_{\tau}\right)/\mathrm{d}{q}^2 \) and \( \mathrm{\mathcal{B}}\left({B}_c^{-}\to {X}_3\tau {\overline{\nu}}_{\tau}\right) \), on the other hand, the two solutions give sizable enhancements relative to the SM predictions. With measurement of \( {B}_c^{-}\to {\tau}^{-}{\overline{\nu}}_{\tau } \) at LHCb and refined measurements of observables in \( \overline{B}\to {D}^{\left(\ast \right)}\tau {\overline{\nu}}_{\tau } \) at both LHCb and Belle-II, such a specific NP scenario could be further deciphered.

Implications of the ${{\boldsymbol{r}}}_{k}$ and ${{\boldsymbol{r}}}_{{k}^{* }}$ Anomalies

$B$ anomalies in the post $R_{K^{(*)}}$ era

Reading the footprints of the B-meson flavor anomalies

The Global Fits of New Physics in $b \to s $ after $R_{K^{(*)}}$ 2022 Release

R ( D ) and R ( D * ) Anomalies and Their Phenomenological Implications

$B$-anomalies in a twin Pati-Salam theory of flavour including the 2022 LHCb $R_{K^{(*)}}$ analysis

RK(*) and Related B→sℓℓ

To (b)e or not to (b)e: No electrons at LHCb

$B$ meson anomalies and large $B^{+}\to K^{+}ν\barν$ in non-universal $U(1)^\prime$ models

Standard model anomalies: lepton flavour non-universality, g − 2 and W-mass

Review of Semileptonic $B$ Anomalies

Consequences of $b\, \to\, s\, μ^+\, μ^-$ anomalies on $B \, \to \, K^{(*)} \,ν\, \barν$, $B_s \to\, (η,η') \, ν\,\barν$ and $B_s \, \to \, ϕ\, ν\, \barν$ decay observables

Investigating $R_D$ and $R_{D^*}$ anomalies in a Left-Right model with an Inverse Seesaw

Global fit to $b \to cτν$ anomalies as of Spring 2024

Consequences of R-Parity violating interactions for anomalies in $\bar B\to D^{(*)} \tau \bar \nu$ and $b\to s \mu^+\mu^-$

Lepton Flavor Violating $B\to K^*_2(1430)μ^{\pm}τ^{\mp}$ Decays

({b ightarrow c au u }) transitions in the standard model effective field theory

New Physics in $b \to s \ell^+ \ell^-$ confronts new data on Lepton Universality

Revisiting the One Leptoquark Solution to the R ( D (∗) ) Anomalies and Its Phenomenological Implications

Global fit to $b \to cτν$ anomalies 2022 mid-autumn

Correlating $B\to K^{(\ast)} ν\barν$ and flavor anomalies in SMEFT