Reply to Subramaniam, Van Heel, and Henderson: Validity of the Cryo-Electron Microscopy Structures of the HIV-1 Envelope Glycoprotein Complex

Youdong Mao,Luis R. Castillo-Menendez,Joseph Sodroski
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1316666110
2013-01-01
Abstract:Subramaniam (1), van Heel (2), and Henderson (3) express their opinions and hypotheses about our cryo-electron microscopy (EM) structures of the uncleaved HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein [Env(-)ΔCT] trimer (4, 5). There are no data in these communications, nor elsewhere in the published literature, that contradict our results; however, we conducted systematic additional studies that provide strong evidence disproving their hypotheses. We appreciate the potential pitfalls of analyzing low-contrast images and indeed took specific measures to avoid reference bias in our particle-picking approach (6). Importantly, we conducted validation studies on our Env(-)ΔCT structures using independent datasets and tests. We offered the primary data to the reviewers of this communication. We respond to the comments of Subramaniam, van Heel, and Henderson as follows.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?