Rotational Bands In101–103nband98,100…

J. K. Hwang,A. V. Ramayya,J. Gilat,J. H. Hamilton,L.K. Peker,J.O. Rasmussen,J. Kormicki,T. N. Ginter,B. R. S. Babu,C. J. Beyer,E. F. Jones,R. Donangelo,S. J. Zhu,H. C. Griffin,G. M. Ter Akopian,Yu. Ts. Oganessian,A. V. Daniel,W. C.,P. G. Varmette,J. D. Cole,R. Aryaeinejad,M. W. Drigert,M. A. Stoyer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.58.3252
IF: 3.199
1998-01-01
Physical Review C
Abstract:Several $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ transitions in ${}^{101--103}\mathrm{Nb},{ }^{98,100}\mathrm{Y},{ }^{146}\mathrm{La},$ and ${}^{149}\mathrm{Pr}$ are identified from spontaneous fission studies employing a ${}^{252}\mathrm{Cf}$ source and the Gammasphere detector array. In particular, the pairing-free bands in ${}^{100}\mathrm{Y}$ and ${}^{102}\mathrm{Nb}$ are extended, two rather highly deformed negative-parity bands feeding the 4.3-s $\ensuremath{\beta}$-decaying isomer of ${}^{102}\mathrm{Nb}$ are identified, and their possible bandhead configurations are discussed. In the case of ${}^{101,103}\mathrm{Nb},$ we have extended previously reported level schemes by over 20 transitions in each nuclide. For the fission partners ${}^{146}\mathrm{La}$ and ${}^{149}\mathrm{Pr}$ we have elucidated their previously unreported yrast level schemes.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?