Abstract:Deliberation about what to do in any context requires reasoning about what will or would happen in various alternative situations, including situations that the agent knows will never in fact be realized. In contexts that involve two or more agents who have to take account of each others’ deliberation, the counterfactual reasoning may become quite complex. When I deliberate, I have to consider not only what the causal effects would be of alternative choices that I might make, but also what other agents might believe about the potential effects of my choices, and how their alternative possible actions might affect my beliefs. Counter factual possibilities are implicit in the models that game theorists and decision theorists have developed – in the alternative branches in the trees that model extensive form games and the different cells of the matrices of strategic form representations – but much of the reasoning about those possibilities remains in the informal commentary on and motivation for the models developed. Puzzlement is sometimes expressed by game theorists about the relevance of what happens in a game ‘off the equilibrium path’: of what would happen if what is (according to the theory) both true and known by the players to be true were instead false. My aim in this paper is to make some suggestions for clarifying some of the concepts involved in counterfactual reasoning in strategic contexts, both the reasoning of the rational agents being modeled, and the reasoning of the theorist who is doing the modeling, and to bring together some ideas and technical tools developed by philosophers and logicians that I think might be relevant to the analysis of strategic reasoning, and more generally to the conceptual foundations of game theory.

Rational dynamics in game theory

Rational Dynamics and Epistemic Logic in Games

Rational Dynamics And Epistemic Logic In Games (Vol 9, Pg 13, 2007)

Decisions, Actions, and Games: A Logical Perspective

Erratum: "rational dynamics and epistemic logic in games"

Game Theory , Logic and Rational Choice

Game Solution, Epistemic Dynamics and Fixed-Point Logics

Rationalizations and Promises in Games

Rationalizing Irrational Beliefs

Logic in Games

Operations on Games

Toward a Theory of Play: A Logical Perspective on Games and Interaction.

Logico-Computational Aspects of Rationality

Games in Dynamic‐Epistemic Logic

Control for Smart Systems: Applications, Trends, and Future Challenges

Dynamic-Epistemic Mechanisms at Play

Logic and Interactive RAtionality Yearbook 2012

Logic, Rational Agency, and Intelligent Interaction

A Theory of Bounded Inductive Rationality

Knowledge, Belief and Counterfactual Reasoning in Games

Reconciling Rationality and Stochasticity: Rich Behavioral Models in Two-Player Games