Abstract:As the clean water shortage becomes a serious problem for mankind, atmospheric water harvesting has emerged as a viable solution. Two main approaches to collect water from the atmosphere exist: the first is to capture it from fog, whereas the second is through condensation of vapor on surfaces with a temperature below the dew point. The water collection mechanism in these two modes is completely different. In this work, we develop a deeper understanding of the effect of surface wettability on gravity-assisted atmospheric water harvesting and a comparative study of the two collection modes (fog and dew). First, we present theoretical estimates for the maximum water mass available in each mode and introduce an efficiency factor η which enables the direct comparison among surfaces in different setups and modes. Then we fabricate a series of micronanostructured surfaces with different surface wetting properties from hydrophilic to superhydrophobic. Our results demonstrate that drop mobility, derived from the surface superhydrophobic properties and micronanotopography, is the most important factor affecting fog collection: superhydrophobic surfaces show 40–65% higher fog collection rates compared to flat hydrophilic surfaces, with the more mobile among superhydrophobic surfaces (hysteresis 2°, and air–liquid fraction fA-L > 0.9) showing higher water collection. On the other hand, dew harvesting efficiency depends on the combination of drop mobility and nucleation rate, with superhydrophobic surfaces exhibiting 40% higher water collection rate compared to the flat hydrophilic or hydrophobic surfaces due to their low hysteresis as well as high surface area available for nucleation.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsami.1c16609.Experimental set up description. SEM images of surface topography before and after coating deposition. Experimental calculation of Aeff. Heat transfer coefficient calculation for natural and forced convection. Fog collection efficiency factor calculation as a function of fog air carrier gas flow (PDF)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

Estimates of Global Dew Collection Potential

Estimates of Global Dew Collection Potential on Artificial Surfaces

Assessment of dew harvesting as a sustainable water source and air quality indicator: a case study of Dhanbad, Jharkhand, India

Comparison of Surface Foil Materials and Dew Collectors Location in an Arid Area: a One-Year Field Experiment in Kenya

An Attempt to Utilize a Regional Dew Formation Model in Kenya

Accessible Remote Sensing Data Mining Based Dew Estimation

Comparing Plastic Foils for Dew Collection: Preparatory Laboratory-Scale Method and Field Experiment in Kenya

Deep Radiative Cooling Passive Dew Collection

Modeling Long-Term Temporal Variation of Dew Formation in Jordan and Its Link to Climate Change

Delineation of Dew Formation Zones in Iran Using Long-Term ModelSimulations and Cluster Analysis

Dew formation characteristics at annual and daily scale in xerophyte shrub plantations at Southeast margin of Tengger desert, Northern China

Spatial and Temporal Investigation of Dew Potential Based on Long-Term Model Simulations in Iran

Characteristics and Estimation of Dew in the Loess Hilly Region of Northern Shaanxi Province, China

How Different Are Fog Collection and Dew Water Harvesting on Surfaces with Different Wetting Behaviors?

Atmospheric water harvesting as a sustainable and resilient resource in arid climates: gaining insights from ancient techniques

On the Estimation of Potential Evaporation under Wet and Dry Conditions

Dew Formation Reduction in Global Warming Experiments and the Potential Consequences

Patterned Hybrid Surfaces for Efficient Dew Harvesting

Mornings with the highest non‐rainfall water during 2 years of measurements in the Negev–Ecological implications

Fundamental Limits of the Dew-Harvesting Technology

Even in a Dew Desert: Dewfall Does Not Provide Sufficient Moisture for Biocrust Growth – Evidence from Direct Measurements and a Meteorological Model