How to Select Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome, According to Platelet Function Testing or Pharmacogenomic Testing?

Jing Li,Guang Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.05.121
IF: 4.039
2018-01-01
International Journal of Cardiology
Abstract:Recently, we read the article entitled “High on-treatment platelet reactivity and outcome in elderly with non ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome - Insight from the GEPRESS study” [ [1] De Rosa R. Palmerini T. De Servi S. et al. High on-treatment platelet reactivity and outcome in elderly with non ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome - insight from the GEPRESS study. Int. J. Cardiol. 2018; 259: 20-25 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (19) Google Scholar ] and “Relationship between CHA2DS2-VASc score, coronary artery disease severity, residual platelet reactivity and long-term clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome” [ [2] Scudiero F. Zocchi C. De Vito E. et al. Relationship between CHADS-VASc score, coronary artery disease severity, residual platelet reactivity and long-term clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Int. J. Cardiol. 2018; 262: 9-13 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (13) Google Scholar ] published in International Journal of Cardiology. Both of the two articles concluded that a personalized approach to the selection of antiplatelet therapy may lead to a clinically meaningful reduction in ischemic and bleeding outcomes. However, the selection of antiplatelet therapy according to platelet function testing is controversial.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?