Positive Surgical Margins in Renal Cell Carcinoma

Maria M. Picken,Lu Wang,Gopal N. Gupta

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1309/ajcp9kvhjrxf6dbz

2015-01-01

American Journal of Clinical Pathology

Abstract:In the United States, the incidence of small renal masses continues to increase, largely due to the increased use of cross-sectional imaging.1 Thus, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data from 2011 ranked kidney and renal pelvis cancer seventh and ninth among male and female cancer patients, respectively.1 The National Cancer Institute estimates that there will be 63,920 new cases in 2014.2 Radical nephrectomy (RN) has been the mainstay of treatment for malignant renal masses; however, partial nephrectomy (PN) is now widely accepted as the current “gold standard” for T1 renal masses.3 Although long-term oncologic outcomes are equivalent by both techniques, PN has several advantages.4,5 The widespread adoption of PN came largely from the observation that RN places the patient at substantial risk of progression to chronic renal insufficiency and end-stage renal disease, with consequent increased overall mortality. Nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) not only has a much lower risk of renal failure and its attendant need for dialysis but also provides a significantly better quality of life to the patient.6 This new emphasis has led to the pioneering of surgical advances in NSS that maximize nephron retention through optimization of the precision of PN and the reduction of ischemia time. Nonetheless, the permissible minimal extent of parenchymal margin and the safe warm ischemia time are still actively contested. The optimal surgical technique in elective and imperative NSS has not been established. Wedge resection, enucleoresection within a rim of healthy parenchyma, and pure enucleation all have been used.7 Hence, the issue of optimal margins in NSS is still controversial.8 A distance of 10 mm of uninvolved kidney between the tumor and the surgical margin has been accepted as the norm for NSS5; however, margins of 10 mm may represent an …