621 PARTIAL AND RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY TRENDS: ANALYSIS OF CASE LOGS FROM CERTIFYING UROLOGISTS

Stephen A. Poon,Jonathan L. Silberstein,Ling Chen,Behfar Ehdaie,Philip Kim,Paul Russo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.173

2013-01-01

Abstract:You have accessJournal of UrologyKidney Cancer: Evaluation & Staging (I)1 Apr 2013621 PARTIAL AND RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY TRENDS: ANALYSIS OF CASE LOGS FROM CERTIFYING UROLOGISTS Stephen Poon, Jonathan Silberstein, Ling Chen, Behfar Ehdaie, Philip Kim, and Paul Russo Stephen PoonStephen Poon New York, NY More articles by this author , Jonathan SilbersteinJonathan Silberstein New York, NY More articles by this author , Ling ChenLing Chen New York, NY More articles by this author , Behfar EhdaieBehfar Ehdaie New York, NY More articles by this author , Philip KimPhilip Kim New York, NY More articles by this author , and Paul RussoPaul Russo New York, NY More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.173AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES The concurrent introduction of partial nephrectomy (PN) and laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) within a short time may be inhibiting diffusion of these techniques, with surgeons opting for one innovation or the other. Using American Board of Urology (ABU) case log data, we investigated contemporary trends in these surgical options and how surgeon and practice characteristics may influence these trends. METHODS We obtained annualized case log data for nephrectomies from the ABU for all urologists certifying or recertifying from 2002 to 2010, and evaluated trends in nephrectomy use. Logistic regressions were used to evaluate surgeon and practice characteristics as predictors for partial and laparoscopic procedures. RESULTS From 3,852 case logs submitted by non-pediatric urologists, 48,384 nephrectomies were analyzed. From 2002 to 2010, annual nephrectomies performed as open radical nephrectomies (ORN) decreased from 53% to 27% (figure), and use of LRN moderately increased from 29% to 37%; open PN (OPN) remained stable at 15% and laparoscopic PN (LPN) increased 8-fold, from 2% to 16%. On multivariable analysis, laparoscopy was more likely to be performed by initial certifying and first-time recertifying urologists than second-time recertifying urologists (OR 1.94, p<0.0005; OR 1.32, p<0.0005, respectively). Predictors of laparoscopy use included annual volume (per 10 cases: OR 1.08, p<0.0005), endourology (OR 2.12, p<0.0005) or urolithiasis (OR 1.37, p<0.0005) subspecialty, and practicing in the Northeast (NE) (OR 1.14, p<0.0005). In regards to PN, initial certifying urologists had higher odds of performing PN (OR 1.15, p<0.0005) as compared to second-time recertifiers, but there was no significant difference between first- and second-time recertifiers. Oncology subspecialty (OR 1.34, p<0.0005), practicing in the NE (OR 1.09, p=0.01), and annual volume (per 10 cases: OR 1.06, p<0.0005) were predictors of PN. CONCLUSIONS Since 2002, use of laparoscopic nephrectomy and PN has increased. However, the diffusion of these techniques is not uniform and is highly dependent on surgeon characteristics. Factors that affect the adoption of these techniques require further research. © 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 189Issue 4SApril 2013Page: e253-e254 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Stephen Poon New York, NY More articles by this author Jonathan Silberstein New York, NY More articles by this author Ling Chen New York, NY More articles by this author Behfar Ehdaie New York, NY More articles by this author Philip Kim New York, NY More articles by this author Paul Russo New York, NY More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...