Crystal Structures of the 2:2 Complex of 1,1′-(1,2-phenylene)bis(3-m-tolylurea) and Tetrabutylammonium Chloride or Bromide

Chao Huang,Ruyu Wang,Xi Shu,Fan Yu,Yue Qi,Shoujian Li,Chuanqin Xia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/s2056989017009951
2017-01-01
Abstract:The title compounds, tetrabutylammonium chloride–1,1′-(1,2-phenylene)bis(3- m -tolylurea) (1/1), C 16 H 36 N + ·Cl − ·C 22 H 22 N 4 O 2 or [( n -Bu 4 N + ·Cl − )(C 22 H 22 N 4 O 2 )] (I) and tetrabutylammonium bromide–1,1′-(1,2-phenylene)bis(3- m -tolylurea) (1/1), C 16 H 36 N + ·Br − ·C 22 H 22 N 4 O 2 or [(n-Bu 4 N + ·Br − )(C 22 H 22 N 4 O 2 )] (II), both comprise a tetrabutylammonium cation, a halide anion and an ortho -phenylene bis-urea molecule. Each halide ion shows four N—H... X ( X = Cl or Br) interactions with two urea receptor sites of different bis-urea moieties. A crystallographic inversion centre leads to the formation of a 2:2 arrangement of two halide anions and two bis-urea molecules. In the crystals, the dihedral angle between the two urea groups of the bis-urea molecule in (I) [defined by the four N atoms, 165.4 (2)°] is slightly smaller than that in (II) [167.4 (2)°], which is probably due to the smaller ionic radius of chloride compared to bromide.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?