Economic Thoughts from an East Asian Perspective: a Conceptual Framework of Viability and Development Strategy

Justin Yifu Lin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17538960802586040

2008-01-01

China Economic Journal

Abstract:This paper attempts an analytical framework centred on the relationship between the concept of viability and choice of development strategy. On the basis of a critical review on the mainstream literature in economic development, it presents the conceptual framework with an emphasis on elaborating the dichotomy of 'comparative advantage defying (CAD) strategy' versus 'comparative advantage following (CAF) strategy'. Empirical experiences of economic development in China and other East Asian economies in the contemporary era are discussed in the context of the conceptual framework. Keywords: economic developmenteconomic thoughtsviability and development strategy Notes 1. To this list Rodrik (2003 Rodrik, D. 2003. "Introduction: What do we learn from country narratives?". In In search of prosperity: Analytic narratives on economic growth, Edited by: Rodrik, D. 1–19. Princeton, , NJ, and Oxford UK: Princeton University Press. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar]) adds integration or trade, which is supported by empirical evidence from studies by Dollar (1992), Frankel and Romer (1999) and Sachs and Warner (1995 Sachs, J. D and Warner, A. M. 1995. Economic reform and the process of global integration. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, : 1–118. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) and which is advocated strongly by international organizations, including the World Bank, the IMF, the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). However, I will argue that the openness of a country is endogenous to the government's development strategy, and as such should not be considered a fundamental determinant of long-term growth in a country. 2. A good example is that, in the socialist revolutions in China and many other countries, most revolutionary leaders came from bourgeois families. 3. My definition of 'strategy' is similar to that of Rodrik (2005). 4. The bureaucrats in the lower levels of government in a developing country may subsequently use the interventions/regulations endogenous in the development strategy for their personal gain. However, the grabbing hand of lower-level bureaucrats should be viewed as a consequence rather than the cause of the distortions and regulations that were created by the first generation leaders. Similarly, various interest groups may have taken advantage of the interventions/regulations that arose in order to seek rents to benefit themselves. Again, such rent-seeking can be viewed as a consequence and not the cause of distortions. 5. The adoption of certain technologies – for example, the replacement of the three-field cropping system with the more intensive two-field system in Europe – might be endogenous to the increase in population pressure, as argued by Boserup (1965 Boserup, E. 1965. The conditions of agricultural growth, Chicago: Aldine. [Google Scholar]). The invention of new technologies at that time, however, came about mostly through accidental discoveries by peasants and artisans rather than through purposeful research efforts (Needham 1969 Needham, J. 1969. The grand titration: Science and society in East and West, Toronto: University of Toronto Press. [Google Scholar]). 6. In effect, the political leaders in Australia and Germany, France and other countries in Western Europe in the 19th century had pursued exactly the same goal when they saw the contrasts between Britain's rising industrial power and the backwardness of their own predominately agrarian economies (Gerschenkron 1962 Gerschenkron, A. 1962. Economic backwardness in historical perspective, a book of essays, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]). 7. Understanding the lack of capital in China, Dr Sun planned to borrow foreign capital for China's industrialization. His position was different from Mao's and many other revolutionary leaders in China and in other developing countries, who advocated the idea of self-reliance. 8. For an authoritative compilation of the various editions of the Tableau, see Kuczynsky and Meek (1972 Kuczynsky, M. and Meek, R. L. 1972. Quesnays Tableau Économique, London: Macmillan. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar]). 9. In 1929, the Great Depression began in the West. During the 1930s, economic development in the West was beset with crises and stagnation. Led by Stalin, the Soviet Union adopted a planned economic system and prioritized the development of heavy industries. As the country with the most abundant natural resources per capita in the world, it had great potential to sustain its investment-led growth by mobilizing natural resources to support investment. Before the Second World War, the Soviet Union had already become industrialized, with strong military industries. The disadvantages of the planned economy were not revealed until the 1970s. The sharp contrast in economic performance between the Soviet Union and the developed capitalist countries in the 1930s had a profound impact on the thinking and policies of social elites and political leaders in the developing world after the Second World War. 10. The new field of development economics was regarded as covering underdevelopment because 'conventional economics' did not apply (Hirschman 1982 Hirschman, A. O. 1982. "The rise and decline of development economics". In The theory and experience of economic development, Edited by: Gersovitz, M. and Lewis, W. A. 372–90. London: Allen and Unwin. [Google Scholar]). Early trade and development theories and policy prescriptions were based on some widely accepted stylized facts and premises about developing countries (Krueger 1997 Krueger, A. O. 1997. Trade policy and economic development: How we learn. American Economic Review, 87(1): 1–22. [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]); these included: (1) developing economies' production structures were oriented heavily towards primary commodity production; (2) if developing countries adopted policies of free trade, their comparative advantage would forever lie in primary commodity production; (3) the global income elasticity and the price elasticity of demand for primary commodities were low; (4) capital accumulation was crucial for growth and, in the early stage of development, it could occur only with the importation of capital goods. Based on these stylized facts and premises, it was a small step to believe that the process of development was industrialization, and industrialization consisted primarily of the substitution of domestic production of manufactured goods for imports (Chenery 1958 Chenery, H. B. 1958. "The role of industrialization in development programmes". In The economics of underdevelopment, Edited by: Agarwala, A. N. and Singh, S. P. 450–71. Bombay: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]). 11. As measured by the 1990 purchasing power parity (PPP). 12. Endowment structure refers to the relative abundance of capital, labour and natural resources. 13. The principle of comparative advantage – based on different labour productivity – has its origin in the works of David Ricardo, J.S. Mill and Alfred Marshall. The modern version of comparative advantage proposed by Heckscher and Ohlin (1991 Heckscher, E. F. and Ohlin, B. 1991. Heckscher-Ohlin Trade Theory, Edited by: Flam, H. and Flanders, M. J. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Translated, edited and introduced by [Google Scholar]) is based on the comparative cost, due to the differences in the factor endowment structure. I draw inspiration from Heckscher and Ohlin (1991 Heckscher, E. F. and Ohlin, B. 1991. Heckscher-Ohlin Trade Theory, Edited by: Flam, H. and Flanders, M. J. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Translated, edited and introduced by [Google Scholar]) in developing my arguments. In their model, however, the technology in each industry is assumed to be identical in the developed and developing countries and a country should produce more goods that use its abundant factor intensively to exchange for goods that use its scarce factor intensively. However, more realistically, the technologies used in the developed and developing countries are not identical. Lin and Zhang (2007) built a dynamic model to show that a country should go into the industries and adopt the technologies that use its abundant factor intensively to produce goods. Their model allows a country to move up its technology and industry ladders along with the upgrading of its endowment structure from relative scarcity in capital to relative abundance in capital. According to that model, a country's optimal industry/technology choice is then endogenously determined by its endowment structure at each stage of its economic development and the optimal industry/technology choice should be upgraded according to the accumulation of capital in the endowments. 14. If a normally managed firm is expected to earn a socially acceptable profit in a free, competitive market without government protection or subsidies, the firm is viable. There could be many factors that affect the viability of a firm. In this paper, as well as in my other works, I use the term 'non-viability' to describe the inability of normally managed firms to earn socially acceptable profits due to their choices of industry, product and technology deviating from those deemed optimal by the economy's endowment structure. 15. The models based on increasing returns, such as Krugman (1981 Krugman, P. 1981. Trade, accumulation and uneven development. Journal of Development Economics, 8(2): 149–61. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar], 1987 Krugman, P. 1987. The narrow moving band, the Dutch disease, and the competitive consequences of Mrs Thatcher. Journal of Development Economics, 27(1/2): 41–55. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar], 1991 Krugman, P. 1991. History versus expectations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2): 651–67. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) and Matsuyama (1991 Matsuyama, K. 1991. Increasing returns, industrialization and indeterminacy of equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2): 616–50. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), and coordination of investments, such as Murphy, Shleifer, and Vishny (1989 Murphy, K. M., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. W. 1989. Industrialization and the big push. Journal of Political Economy, 97(5): 1003–26. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), assume that the endowment structure of each country is identical, and, therefore, that firms will be viable in an undistorted, open, competitive market once the government helps the firms overcome market failure and escape the poor-equilibrium trap. Such models could be appropriate for considering the government's role in assisting firms to compete with those in other countries in a similar stage of development. However they are inappropriate as policy guidance for developing countries that are attempting to catch up with developed countries because the endowment structures in developing and developed countries are different. 16. The financial repression discussed by McKinnon (1973 McKinnon, R. I. 1973. Money and capital in economic development, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. [Google Scholar]) and Shaw (1973 Shaw, E. S. 1973. Financial deepening in economic development, New York: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]) is a result of this strategy. 17. The excessive regulation and administrative control will cause many private activities to escape into informal sectors (de Soto 1987 de Soto, H. 1987. The other path, New York: Harper & Row. [Google Scholar]). 18. The soft-budget constraint is a term coined by Kornai (1986 Kornai, J. 1986. The soft budget constraint. Kyklos, 39(1): 3–30. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), which became a popular research subject after the article by Dewatripont and Maskin (1995 Dewatripont, M. and Maskin, E. 1995. Credit and efficiency in centralized and decentralized economies. Review of Economic Studies, 62(4): 541–56. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). According to Kornai, the soft-budget constraint is a result of the paternalism of a socialist state; and, according to Dewatripont and Maskin, it is an endogenous phenomenon, arising from a time inconsistency problem. In Lin and Tan (1999) and Lin and Li (2008), I argue that the soft-budget constraint arises from the policy burdens imposed on enterprises. 19. With the government's protection andsubsidies, firms in the prioritized industries might appear to be very profitable. These profits, however, come from the transfer of surplus from other industries through the government's administrative measures, such as a price scissor between industry and agriculture (Sah and Stiglitz 1984 Sah, R. K. and Stiglitz, J. E. 1984. The economics of price scissors. American Economic Review, 74(1): 125–38. [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar], 1987 Sah, R. K. and Stiglitz, J. E. 1987. Price scissors and the structure of the economy. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102(1): 109–34. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). Such profits do not constitute a 'real' economic surplus in the economy. 20. In the models of Olson (1982 Olson, M. 1982. The decline and fall of nations: Economic growth, stagflation and social rigidities, New Haven: Yale University Press. [Google Scholar]), Acemoglu, Johnson, and Robinson (2001 Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. and Robinson, J. A. 2001. The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. American Economic Review, 91(5): 1369–401. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar], 2002 Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. and Robinson, J. A. 2002. Reversal of fortune: Geography and institutions in the making of the modern world income distribution. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(4): 1231–94. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar], 2005 Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. and Robinson, J. A. 2005. "Institutions as the fundamental cause of long-run growth". In Handbook of economic growth. Volume 1, Part A, Edited by: Aghion, P. and Durlauf, S. N. 385–472. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers (North-Holland). [Crossref] , [Google Scholar]), Grossman and Helpman (1996 Grossman, G. M. and Helpman, E. 1996. Electoral competition and special interest politics. The Review of Economic Studies, 63(2): 265–86. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar], 2001 Grossman, G. M., Helpman, E. and Helpman, E. 2001. Special interest politics, Cambridge and London: MIT Press. [Google Scholar]) and Engerman and Sokoloff (1997 Engerman, S. L. and Sokoloff, K.L. 1997. "Factor endowments, institutions, and differential paths of growth among new world economies: A view from economic historians of the United States". In How Latin America fell behind, Edited by: Haber, S. 260–304. Stanford: Stanford University Press. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar]), government intervention, institutional distortions and rent seeking arise from the capture of government by powerful vested-interest elites. Logically, their models can explain some observed interventions and distortions, such as import quotas, tax subsidies, entry regulations and so on. Their theories cannot, however, explain the existence of other important interventions and distortions – for example, the pervasiveness of public-owned enterprises in developing countries, which are against the interests of the powerful elites. 21. It is a general principle that the government will create distortions if it aims to change an endogenous phenomenon directly without changing the underlying conditions/constraints that cause the phenomenon to exist. 22. Porter (1990 Porter, M. E. 1990. The competitive advantage of nations, New York: Free Press. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar]) makes the term 'competitive advantage' popular. According to him, a nation will have competitive advantage in the global economy if the industries in the nation fulfil the following four conditions: (1) their industries intensively uses the nation's abundant and relatively inexpensive factors of production, (2) their products have large domestic markets, (3) each industry forms domestic clusters and (4) markets are competitive. The first condition in effect means that the industries should be the economy's comparative advantage determined by the nations' endowments. The third and the fourth conditions will hold only if the industries are consistent with the nation's competitive advantage. Therefore, the four conditions can be reduced to independent conditions: the comparative advantage and domestic market size. Among these two independent conditions, the comparative advantage is more important than the domestic market size because if an industry is the nation's comparative advantage, the industry's product will have a global market. This is the reason why among the richest countries in the world, many of them are very small (Lin and Ren 2007 Lin, J. Y. and Ren, R. N. 2007. East Asian miracle debate revisited. Jingji Yanjiu (Economic Research Journal), 42(8): 4–12. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]). 23. Historically, for those countries relying successfully on the advantage of backwardness to achieve industrialization – that is, the continental countries in Western Europe in the 19th century and the Asian NIEs after the Second World War – they all borrowed technology from countries whose per capita income was not too much greater than theirs. In such circumstances, the borrowed technology will be consistent with the borrowing country's comparative advantage and the enterprises using the borrowed technology will be viable. According to the estimations of Maddison (2006), the per capita incomes of the continental countries in Western Europe were about 60% of that of the United Kingdom in 1870. Similarly, in post Second World War development, the four East Asian NIEs borrowed technology from Japan instead of North America and Western Europe. In addition, the technology and industry transferred from Japan to the East Asian NIEs followed a flying-goose pattern in the initial stage (Akamatsu 1962 Akamatsu, K. 1962. A historical pattern of economic growth in developing countries. The Developing Economies, : 3–25. Tokyo, Preliminary Issue no. 1[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) – that is, industrial development in the East Asian NIEs followed one step behind the Japanese industries (Kim 1988 Kim, Y. H. 1988. Higashi Ajia Kogyoka to Sekai Shihonshugi (Industrialisation of East Asia and the world capitalism), Tokyo: Toyo Keizai Shimpo-sha. [Google Scholar]). For the poorer countries in Eastern Europe – such as Hungary and Russia – whose per capita income was about 30% of that of the United Kingdom in 1870, an attempt similar to that by Western European countries in the late 19th century resulted in a much higher degree of government intervention and direct involvement, causing various difficulties and economic stagnation after the industries were established (Gerschenkron 1962 Gerschenkron, A. 1962. Economic backwardness in historical perspective, a book of essays, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]). When borrowing technology from advanced countries, however, developing countries often aim for the most advanced technology, causing all kinds of difficulties due to the CAD nature of such type of borrowing. 24. The above discussion does not mean that a country that follows a CAF strategy does not need to engage in indigenous innovation. To be successful, the country needs to undertake process innovation to make the borrowed technology suitable to local conditions. The country also needs to do indigenous product innovation in sectors in which the country has already been the world leader or has been just a step behind the world leader. For further discussions, see Lin and Ren (2007 Lin, J. Y. and Ren, R. N. 2007. East Asian miracle debate revisited. Jingji Yanjiu (Economic Research Journal), 42(8): 4–12. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]). 25. The next six paragraphs on the government's role in overcoming information, coordination and externality issues are drawn from Lin (2003). 26. Most 'big-push' attempts by the less-developed countries (LDCs) in the 1950s and 1960s failed. There has, however, been renewed interest in the idea since the influential articles by Murphy, Shleifer, and Vishny (1989 Murphy, K. M., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. W. 1989. Industrialization and the big push. Journal of Political Economy, 97(5): 1003–26. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). Their paper showed that government coordination and support were required for setting up a key industry and that the demand spillovers from the key industry to other industries would enhance economic growth. For the big-push strategy to be successful, the 'pushed' industry must be consistent with the comparative advantage – which is determined by the relative factor endowment of the economy – and the firms in the pushed industry must be viable after the push. Deviation from comparative advantage in the pushed industries and the consequent lack of viability of the chosen firms are the reasons why so many big-push attempts by LDCs in the 1950s and 1960s failed. 27. For example, the optimal financial institution in a country will be different from an early agrarian stage of development to a modern, industrialized stage of development and the government needs to play an active role to facilitate the transition from and operation of one institution to another institution along the development path. At the early agrarian stage, most financial transactions are between rich landlords and poor tenant farmers. The dominant form of financial arrangement is informal. The transactions rely mainly on private enforcement to prevent the problem of moral hazards. With the coming and deepening of industrialization, the demands for capital increase continuously as well as the risk of investment. Formal financial arrangements, such as banks, bonds and equity market play an increasingly important role for mobilizing financial resources and for sharing risks. The government needs to provide adequate regulations and supervisions for the well-functioning of the above formal financial institutions. 28. The development-state theory also advises the government in a developing country to play an active role in the development process. Based on their observation of East Asia's successful development experiences, the proponents of development-state theory propose the government in a developing country to adopt industrial policy to promote selective industries and to use distorted interest to subsidize the development of those industries in the process of a country's economic development. However, the development-state theory did not specify that the chosen industries should be consistent with the country's comparative advantages, while the facilitating-state theory does so. Moreover, the term 'developmental state' could cause some confusion because the government that adopts a CAD strategy also does similar interventions as proposed by the development-state theory to support the development of selective industries. As Lewis (1955 Lewis, A. 1955. Theory of economic growth, London: Allen and Unvwin. [Google Scholar], 376) observed, '[G]overnments may fail either because they do too little, or because they do too much.' If the government in a developing country follows the teaching of minimum state and does not play an active role in the development of industry, markets and institutions – as required by a CAF strategy – it is doing too little. If, however, the government adopts a CAD strategy, it is doing too much. The government will become a dirigisme state as criticized by Lal (1983 Lal, D. 1983. The poverty of development economics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar], 1994 Lal, D. 1994. Against Dirigisme: The case for unshackling economic markets, San Francisco: International Center for Economic Growth, ICS Press. [Google Scholar]). For a recent review of development-state theory, see the article by Fritz and Menocal (2007 Fritz, V. and Menocal, A. R. 2007. Developmental states in the new millennium: Concepts and challenges for a new aid agenda. Development Policy Review, 25(5): 531–52. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) and 10 articles in Development Policy Review, Volume 25, No. 5 (September 2007). 29. The dynamic comparative advantage is another argument often used for the government's industrial policy and support to firms (Redding 1999 Redding, S. 1999. Dynamic comparative advantage and the welfare effects of trade. Oxford Economic Papers, 51: 15–39. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). In my framework, however, it can be seen clearly that theargument is valid only if the government's support is limited to overcoming information and coordination costs and the pioneering firm's externality to other firms. The industry should be consistent with the comparative advantage of the economy and the firms in the new industry should be viable, otherwise the firms will collapse once the government's support is removed. If not, the required lengthy support to the firms in the industries advocated by most dynamic comparative-advantage theories will crowd out the resources available to other firms that are consistent with the competitive advantage of the economy and slow economic growth and capital accumulation. The economy will therefore reach the stage targeted by the dynamic-advantage policy later than an economy that follows a CAF strategy (Lin and Zhang 2007 Lin, J.Y., and P. Zhang. 2007. Development strategy, optimal industrial structure and economic growth in less developed countries. CID Graduate Student and Postdoctoral Fellow Working Paper no. 19: July. Harvard University. Available from CID Harvard University http://www.cid.harvard.edu/cidwp/grad/019.htm (Accessed: 2 June 2008). [Google Scholar]). 30. To implement the above functions, the government needs to have substantial state capacity; therefore, once the governments of countries such as India, China, Japan, Vietnam and the NIEs in East Asia change their ideas of development and perform the facilitating state's role, the countries can take off quickly. This could be the reason why Chanda and Putterman (2007 Chanda, A. and Putterman, L. 2007. Early starts, reversals and catch-up in the process of economic development. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 109(2): 387–413. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) find that old states such as China and India have been experiencing more rapid economic growth in recent decades. 31. The above argument does not belittle the government's role in achieving an equitable income distribution by income transfer and social protections. For example: the government needs to provide minimum living support to disabled and temporarily unemployed people as well as investing in education and vocational training to assist labourers to meet job requirements. If, however, all able-bodied labourers are employed, it will be much easier for the government to achieve an equitable society than otherwise. Moreover, such income transfer and social protections should be considered as secondary measures instead of primary means to achieve social equity. 32. The above discussion assumes that a country relies on its own capital for investment. The existence of international capital flow will not change the main conclusions. International capital could come to a developing country in two ways: by borrowing or direct investment. If the government borrows capital to invest in infrastructure or in industries that are consistent with the economy's comparative advantages, the capital inflow will benefit the economy's growth. If capital is borrowed to invest in sectors that are against comparative advantages – whether it is borrowed by the government or by the private sector – a period of investment-led growth could be prolonged, but the poor performance will not change and the economy could encounter crisis when it is time to repay the foreign debt. Foreign capital could also come as direct investment, for which there could be two possible purposes: to use the developing country as an export production base or to penetrate into the developing country's domestic markets. Investment for the former will be in sectors that are consistent with the country's comparative advantages; for the latter, the goods produced by the foreign-owned firms will be more advanced and capital-intensive than those produced by domestic firms. To reduce production costs, however, the foreign-owned firms will substitute the capital with low-cost local labour to the extent that the technology permits. Therefore, the capital intensity of the foreign subsidiary in a developing country will be lower than that in the home, developed country. 33. As measured using the consumer price index. 34. Compared with most other developing countries, South Korea's industrial upgrading has followed quite closely its comparative advantage at each stage of its development, which can be inferred from the facts that Korean products are competitive in international markets once the government helps the enterprises with the initial supports and protection to build up the production capacities. The enterprises in those industries are therefore viable. Compared with Taiwan, however, South Korea's development strategy after the 1970s was more ambitious and the South Korean government was required to give protection for longer and more subsidies to its enterprises than did Taiwan. As the model by Krugman (1987 Krugman, P. 1987. The narrow moving band, the Dutch disease, and the competitive consequences of Mrs Thatcher. Journal of Development Economics, 27(1/2): 41–55. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) suggests, the heavy and chemical drive in the 1970s changed the human capital endowment in South Korea through the effect of learning by doing, enabling South Korean enterprises to jump from OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) directly to OBM (Original Brand Manufacturer), while Taiwanese enterprises in general followed step-by-step from OEM to ODM (Original Design Manufacturer) and finally to OBM (Lee 2007 Lee, K. 2007. Making a technological catch-up: Barriers and opportunities. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 13(2): 97–131. [Taylor & Francis Online] , [Google Scholar]). South Korea today is quite competitive in capital-intensive industries, such as steel, shipbuilding, automobiles and electronics, and these industries in general are heavier than in Taiwan. Taiwan's economic performance, however – measured in terms of the economic growth rate, per capita income levels and macro stability – has been better than South Korea's. Taiwan weathered the East Asian financial crisis in the late 1990s without much harm, while the South Korean economy encountered a severe melt-down and was forced to accept a conditional IMF rescue. In the past few years, the South Korean economy has outperformed the Taiwanese economy; however, Taiwan's relatively poor performance is likely the result of its government's policies to obstruct the further integration of the Taiwanese economy with the economy of mainland China. In contrast, the South Korean government has been supportive of integration between its economy and the Chinese economy. 35. An example is China's great leap forward in 1958–1960, which aimed to use China's vast population to rapidly transform the country from a primarily agrarian economy dominated by peasant farmers to a modern, industrialized society. The result was a great famine in 1959–1961, which caused 30 million extra deaths (Lin 1990 Lin, J. Y. 1990. Collectivization and China's agricultural crisis in 1959–1961. Journal of Political Economy, 98(6): 1228–52. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]; Lin and Yang 2000 Lin, J. Y. and Yang, D. T. 2000. Food availability, entitlements and the Chinese famine of 1959–61. Economic Journal, 110(460): 136–58. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). 36. In his final years, Deng's only formal title was an honorary chairman of China's Bridge Society. He was, however, the de facto supreme leader until his death. 37. In China, a leader's prestige is accumulated through the merits of his/her contributions to the people and the nation during his/her career and people's trust of his/her wisdom to provide a good guidance for the nation's future. If a political leader openly admits that he/she made a mistake in a major policy in the past, people may lose their confidence of his/her wisdom and his/her prestige will be hurt.