Author Response: Multi-protein Bridging Factor 1(mbf1), Rps3 and Asc1 Prevent Stalled Ribosomes from Frameshifting
Jiyu Wang,Jie Zhou,Qidi Yang,Elizabeth J. Grayhack
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.39637.031
2018-01-01
Abstract:Article Figures and data Abstract eLife digest Introduction Results Discussion Materials and methods Data availability References Decision letter Author response Article and author information Metrics Abstract Reading frame maintenance is critical for accurate translation. We show that the conserved eukaryotic/archaeal protein Mbf1 acts with ribosomal proteins Rps3/uS3 and eukaryotic Asc1/RACK1 to prevent frameshifting at inhibitory CGA-CGA codon pairs in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutations in RPS3 that allow frameshifting implicate eukaryotic conserved residues near the mRNA entry site. Mbf1 and Rps3 cooperate to maintain the reading frame of stalled ribosomes, while Asc1 also mediates distinct events that result in recruitment of the ribosome quality control complex and mRNA decay. Frameshifting occurs through a +1 shift with a CGA codon in the P site and involves competition between codons entering the A site, implying that the wobble interaction of the P site codon destabilizes translation elongation. Thus, eukaryotes have evolved unique mechanisms involving both a universally conserved ribosome component and two eukaryotic-specific proteins to maintain the reading frame at ribosome stalls. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.39637.001 eLife digest Proteins perform all the chemical reactions needed to keep a cell alive; thus, it is essential to assemble them correctly. They are made by molecular machines called ribosomes, which follow a sequence of instructions written in genetic code in molecules known as mRNAs. Ribosomes essentially read the genetic code three letters at a time; each triplet either codes for the insertion of one of 20 building blocks into the emerging protein, or serves as a signal to stop the process. It is critical that, after reading one triplet, the ribosome moves precisely three letters to read the next triplet. If, for example, the ribosome shifted just two letters instead of three – a phenomenon known as “frameshifting” – it would completely change the building blocks that were used to make the protein. This could lead to atypical or aberrant proteins that either do not work or are even toxic to the cell. For a variety of reasons, ribosomes will often stall before they have finished building a protein. When this happens, the ribosome is more likely to frameshift. Cells commonly respond to stalled ribosomes by recruiting other molecules that work as quality control systems, some of which can disassemble the ribosome and break down the mRNA. In budding yeast, one part of the ribosome – named Asc1 – plays a key role in recruiting these quality control systems and in mRNA breakdown. If this component is removed, stalled ribosomes frameshift more frequently and, as a result, aberrant proteins accumulate in the cell. Since the Asc1 recruiter protein sits on the outside of the ribosome, it seemed likely that it might act through other factors to stop the ribosome from frameshifting when it stalls. However, it was unknown if such factors exist, what they are, or how they might work. Now, Wang et al. have identified two additional yeast proteins, named Mbf1 and Rps3, which cooperate to stop the ribosome from frameshifting after it stalls. Rps3, like Asc1, is a component of the ribosome, while Mbf1 is not. It appears that Rps3 likely stops frameshifting via an interaction with the incoming mRNA, because a region of Rps3 near the mRNA entry site to the ribosome is important for its activity. Further experiments then showed that the known Asc1-mediated breakdown of mRNAs did not depend on Mbf1 and Rps3, but also assists in stopping frameshifting. Thus, frameshifting of stalled ribosomes is prevented via two distinct ways: one that directly involves Mbf1 and Rps3 and one that is promoted by Asc1, which reduces the amounts of mRNAs on which ribosomes frameshift. These newly identified factors may provide insights into the precisely controlled protein-production machinery in the cell and into roles of the quality control systems. An improved understanding of mechanisms that prevent frameshifting could eventually lead to better treatments for some human diseases that result when these processes go awry, which include certain neurological conditions. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.39637.002 Introduction Accurate translation of mRNA into protein depends upon precise, repetitive three base translocation of the ribosome to maintain the correct reading frame throughout a coding sequence. Reading frame maintenance is challenging because multiple movements of the tRNAs and mRNA as well as conformational changes within the ribosome itself are required to complete a single elongation cycle (Noller et al., 2017). For instance, the tRNA acceptor stems move within the large subunit during formation of the hybrid state, while the joining of EF-G-GTP (eEF2 in eukaryotes) results in additional movement of tRNA, and finally completion of translocation, driven by Pi release, requires additional movements (Belardinelli et al., 2016; Brilot et al., 2013; Noller et al., 2017; Pulk and Cate, 2013; Ramrath et al., 2013; Ratje et al., 2010; Tourigny et al., 2013; Zhou et al., 2014). To accomplish this cycle, many interactions between the tRNAs and ribosome are disrupted, and new interactions are created, but the relative position of the tRNA anticodon to the mRNA codon must be maintained throughout all of these events (Noller et al., 2017; Dever et al., 2018; Rodnina, 2018). Thus, it is critical that mechanisms exist to prevent slippage during these transitions. Reading frame maintenance is facilitated by structures within the ribosome as well as by tRNA modifications. Structural features that contribute to reading frame maintenance, inferred from analysis of prokaryotic translation intermediates, include a swivel of the 30S head relative to the 30S body to form a contracted mRNA tunnel downstream of the A site prior to translocation (Jenner et al., 2010; Schuwirth et al., 2005). In addition, during translocation, two conserved bases in the 16S rRNA intercalate into different positions of the mRNA to prevent slippage (Zhou et al., 2013), while domain IV of EF-G contacts the codon and tRNA in the A/P site and h44 of 16S rRNA, likely coupling mRNA and tRNA movement (Ramrath et al., 2013; Zhou et al., 2014). tRNA modifications within the anticodon loop also assist in reading frame maintenance, inferred both from genetic and structural analyses. Mutants that affect several such modifications in both bacteria and eukaryotes result in increased frameshifting (Atkins and Björk, 2009; Jäger et al., 2013; Tükenmez et al., 2015; Urbonavicius et al., 2001; Waas et al., 2007). Moreover, a cross-strand base stacking interaction between a modified ms2i6A37 in an E. coli tRNAPhe and the mRNA codon is proposed to prevent slippage of P site tRNA on the mRNA (Jenner et al., 2010). Thus, a number of mechanisms exist to prevent loss of reading frame. Nevertheless, ribosomes do move into alternative reading frames in response to specific sequences and structures in mRNA (Atkins and Björk, 2009; Dever et al., 2018; Dinman, 2012). The existence of such events has implied that ribosomal plasticity with respect to reading frame movement is an integral function of the translation machinery. The common feature of all frameshifting events in bacteria to humans is that the ribosome stalls (Dever et al., 2018). The stall can be mediated by combined effects of the A and P site codons (Farabaugh et al., 2006; Gamble et al., 2016), by the presence of downstream structures, or by an upstream Shine-Dalgarno sequence in bacteria (Caliskan et al., 2014; Dinman, 2012). Analysis of programmed frameshifting indicates that additional sequences or protein factors are frequently required to mediate efficient frameshifting (Atkins and Björk, 2009; Dinman, 2012). For instance, +1 programmed frameshifting events are frequently enhanced by stimulatory sequences, although the role of these sequences is not always clear (Guarraia et al., 2007; Taliaferro and Farabaugh, 2007). The identification of mutants that either affect programmed frameshifting or suppress frameshift mutations has pointed to four key factors in reading frame maintenance. First, mutations of ribosomal proteins, particularly those that contact the P site tRNA can cause increased frameshifting. In bacteria, frameshifting mutations are suppressed by deletions within the C terminal domain of ribosomal protein uS9, which contacts the P site tRNA anticodon loop (Jäger et al., 2013). In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, programmed frameshifting in the L-A virus is affected by mutations in 5S rRNA or its interactors uL18 or uL5, that also contact the P site tRNA (Meskauskas and Dinman, 2001; Rhodin and Dinman, 2010; Smith et al., 2001). Frameshifting mutations are also suppressed by a mutation in the yeast RPS3, although this mutation does not affect a tRNA contact (Hendrick et al., 2001). Second, mutations in the basal translation machinery can also affect frameshifting. For instance, frameshifting mutations are suppressed by mutations in both EF-1α, which delivers tRNA to the ribosome (Sandbaken and Culbertson, 1988), and in SUP35, encoding the translation termination factor eRF3 (Wilson and Culbertson, 1988). Third, miRNAs can affect the efficiency of programmed frameshifting, for instance at CCR5 in humans (Belew et al., 2014). Fourth, mutations that affect proteins with previously unknown functions in translation can either alter programmed frameshifting or suppress frameshifting mutations. For instance, in yeast, frameshifting mutations are suppressed by mutations in MBF1, encoding Multi-protein Bridging Factor 1 (Hendrick et al., 2001), or in EBS1 (Ford et al., 2006), while in the porcine virus PRRSV, the RNA binding protein nsp1β stimulates both −1 and −2 frameshifting events (Li et al., 2014). Thus, reading frame maintenance is modulated by ribosomal components, many of which contact the tRNAs, as well as by non-ribosomal proteins and miRNAs. However, the roles of many of these proteins are not understood. We set out to work out the mechanisms that maintain reading frame when eukaryotic ribosomes encounter a stall, the common feature of all frameshifting events. In bacteria, ribosome stalls due to limited availability or functionality of tRNA seem to suffice to cause frameshifting (Gurvich et al., 2005; Seidman et al., 2011). In wild type yeast, ribosomes stall at CGA codon repeats, which inhibit translation due to wobble decoding of CGA by its native tRNAArg(ICG) (Letzring et al., 2010; Letzring et al., 2013). Although frameshifting was detected at several underrepresented heptanucleotide sequences in yeast (Shah et al., 2002), it was not detected at CGA codon repeats (Wolf and Grayhack, 2015). Instead, eukaryotes have evolved new pathways to regulate inefficient translation events, such as the Ribosome Quality Control (RQC) pathway, in which these stalled ribosomes undergo ubiquitination of ribosomal proteins, followed by dissociation of the subunits, and recruitment of the RQC Complex, which mediates CAT tailing and degradation of the nascent polypeptide (Bengtson and Joazeiro, 2010; Brandman and Hegde, 2016; Brandman et al., 2012; Defenouillère et al., 2013; Joazeiro, 2017; Kostova et al., 2017; Shao et al., 2013; Shen et al., 2015; Verma et al., 2013; Wilson et al., 2007; Juszkiewicz and Hegde, 2017; Matsuo et al., 2017; Simms et al., 2017b; Sitron et al., 2017; Sundaramoorthy et al., 2017). The ribosomal protein Asc1/RACK1 mediates these events (Brandman et al., 2012; Kuroha et al., 2010); in the absence of Asc1, ribosomes fail to engage the RQC (Sitron et al., 2017), and also undergo substantial frameshifting at CGA codon repeats (Wolf and Grayhack, 2015). However, Asc1 sits on the outside of the ribosome at the mRNA exit tunnel and likely functions as scaffold for recruitment of other proteins, such as the E3 ubiquitin ligase Hel2/mammalian ZNF598 and Slh1 (Juszkiewicz and Hegde, 2017; Matsuo et al., 2017; Simms et al., 2017b; Sitron et al., 2017; Sundaramoorthy et al., 2017). Based on the location of Asc1 and the precedent that Asc1 recruits other proteins to abort translation, we considered it likely that Asc1 cooperates with additional proteins to mediate reading frame maintenance at CGA codon repeats and set out to find such factors. Here, we provide evidence that the Multi-protein Bridging Factor 1 (Mbf1) and ribosomal proteins Rps3 and Asc1 (homolog of human Rack1) work together to prevent translational slippage at CGA codon repeats. Frameshifting results from inactivation of MBF1, or from mutations in amino acids in Rps3 located on an exposed surface of the protein near the mRNA entry site. Asc1 was previously known to mediate recruitment of the RQC, mRNA cleavage and mRNA decay at similar stall sites (Ikeuchi and Inada, 2016; Kuroha et al., 2010; Letzring et al., 2013; Sitron et al., 2017), as well as reading frame maintenance (Wolf and Grayhack, 2015). We provide evidence that Asc1 and Mbf1 cooperate to mediate reading frame maintenance at similar sites, acting on a common set of substrates, including the seven most slowly translated codon pairs in yeast (Gamble et al., 2016). We examined the precise frameshift at one of these inhibitory pairs, CGA-CGG, purifying the frameshifted polypeptide, followed by analysis with mass spectrometry. We found that frameshifting occurs in the +1 direction at the CGA codon and moreover, that frameshifting is modulated by the competition between the in-frame and +1 frame tRNAs. Results MBF1 (Multi-protein Bridging Factor 1) prevents frameshifting at CGA codon repeats We considered it likely that proteins other than Asc1 worked to prevent frameshifting at CGA codon repeats for two reasons. First, Asc1 binds on the outside of the ribosome, not in the decoding center (Rabl et al., 2011), and thus is not positioned in any obvious way to assist with reading frame maintenance. Second, Asc1 recruits other proteins, Hel2 and Slh1, to recruit the RQC (Brandman and Hegde, 2016; Joazeiro, 2017; Sitron et al., 2017), and thus is likely to work with other proteins in reading frame maintenance. Thus, we set out to identify genes responsible for reading frame maintenance at CGA codon repeats. To isolate mutants that frameshift due to translation of CGA codon repeats, we set up a selection in which a +1 frameshift (caused by 6 adjacent CGA codons) was required to express the URA3 gene. The native URA3 gene was placed in the +1 reading frame downstream of an N-terminal domain of GLN4 encoding amino acids 1–99 (GLN4(1-99)), followed by 6 CGA codons and one additional nucleotide upstream of the URA3 coding region (Figure 1A). This strain exhibits an Ura- phenotype, due to the low levels of frameshifting in an otherwise wild-type background, allowing for an Ura+ selection to obtain mutants with increased frameshifting. As an independent secondary screen for frameshifting mutants due to CGA codon repeats, we integrated a modified version of the RNA-ID reporter with GLN4(1-99) followed by 4 CGA codons and one additional nucleotide upstream of the GFP coding region into the ADE2 locus (Dean and Grayhack, 2012; Wolf and Grayhack, 2015). Thus, GFP expression was dependent upon frameshifting efficiency (Figure 1A). To avoid obtaining mutations in the ASC1 gene, the selection strain also contained a second copy of the ASC1 gene on a plasmid. (Figure 1A). We selected Ura+ mutants from 40 independent cultures each of MATa and MATα parents and then analyzed three Ura+ mutants from each culture by flow cytometry to measure GFP and RFP expression. Most mutants (60% of MATα mutants and 80% of MATa mutants) showed elevated expression of GFP, and we studied those that exhibited relatively high levels of frameshifting, >30% of that in an asc1Δ mutant (Figure 1B). Most mutants (43 of 48 examined) were recessive and mapped to a single complementation group, based on growth of diploids on media lacking uracil (Figure 1—figure supplement 1A), although four dominant mutants were also identified. Figure 1 with 3 supplements see all Download asset Open asset MBF1 (Multi-protein Bridging Factor 1) prevents frameshifting at CGA codon repeats. (A) Schematic of selection for mutants that frameshift at CGA codon repeats. The indicated CGA codon repeats plus one extra nucleotide were inserted upstream of the URA3 and GFP coding region (with an upstream HA tag shown in purple), resulting in an Ura- GFP- parent strain. Additional copies of the ASC1 gene were introduced on a LEU2 plasmid to avoid recessive mutations in the native ASC1 gene. To obtain mutants with increased frameshifting efficiency, Ura+ mutants were selected and screened for increased GFP/RFP. (B) Expression of GLN4(1-99)-(CGA)4+1-GFP is increased in the MATa Ura+ mutants from this selection. Flow cytometry scatter plot showing GFP fluorescence versus RFP fluorescence for three mutants from this selection (P15: mbf1-R89K, light blue; P25: mbf1Δ125–151, black; P38: mbf1-K64E, dark blue), for the asc1Δ mutant (red) and for the wild-type parent strain (gray). (C) Expression of the non-native tRNAArg(UCG)* suppressed the Ura+ phenotype of mutant P25 at 30°C. Serial dilutions of the indicated strains with empty vector or expressing the mutant tRNAArg(UCG)* were grown on the indicated media. (D) Mutations in the MBF1 mutants map in conserved amino acids in both the MBF1-specific domain and the Helix-Turn-Helix (HTH) domain of Mbf1 protein. Alignment of yeast Mbf1 amino acids 60–100 with other eukaryotic species is shown (full alignment see Figure 1—figure supplement 3A). GFP/RFP of frameshifted (CGA)4+1 reporter is shown for mutants obtained from MATa (circles) and MATα (triangles) strains, with the color of markers corresponding to the consensus level of this residue (Blue: 50–90%, Red: >90%), however the conserved residue for R61 is N, and for S86 is Q, with all others identical to yeast. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.39637.003 To confirm that inhibitory decoding of CGA codon repeats is required for frameshifting in these mutants, we showed that introduction of an anticodon-mutated exact match tRNAArg(UCG)* suppressed the Ura+ phenotype of one mutant (Figure 1C). We have shown previously that expression of this exact match tRNAArg(UCG)* results in efficient decoding of CGA codons and suppresses their inhibitory effects on gene expression (Letzring et al., 2010). Thus, the Ura+, GFP+ phenotype of this mutant was due to frameshifting that occurs when the ribosome translates CGA codon repeats inefficiently. We demonstrated that mutations in the yeast gene MBF1, Multi-protein Bridging Factor 1, were responsible for the defects in reading frame maintenance in recessive high GFP mutants. We identified the mutated gene by complementation of the Ura+ phenotype of the P25 recessive mutant with two plasmids from a library that contains 97.2% of the entire yeast genome (Figure 1—figure supplement 1B) (Jones et al., 2008). The complementing plasmids share a single ORF, MBF1. We confirmed that mutations in the MBF1 gene are responsible for frameshifting in three ways. First, a plasmid with only the MBF1 gene complemented the frameshifting Ura+ phenotype of two mutants (Figure 1—figure supplement 2A). Second, deletion of MBF1 in the parent selection strain (Figure 1A) converted that strain from GFP- to GFP+, similar to deletion of ASC1 (Figure 1—figure supplement 2B). Third, 19/19 mutants tested contain mutations in the MBF1 gene. Point mutations isolated in our selection are located at conserved residues near the junctions between two domains (Figure 1D). MBF1 is a highly conserved gene in eukaryotes and archaea, generally less than 160 amino acids with an N-terminal Mbf1-specific domain (that differs between archaea and eukaryotes) and a conserved cro-like helix-turn-helix (HTH) domain (Figure 1D, Figure 1—figure supplement 3A). Mbf1, which was initially identified as a transcription co-activator in Bombyx mori (Li et al., 1994; Takemaru et al., 1997), has been implicated in a similar function in yeast, in this case, interacting with the Gcn4, transcription regulator of the general amino acid control pathway (Takemaru et al., 1998). In testing sensitivity to 3-aminotriazole (3-AT) (Hilton et al., 1965; Schürch et al., 1974), a phenotype of gcn4 mutants due to inability to induce expression of HIS3, we found that two frameshifting point mutants (mbf1-K64E and mbf1-I85T) exhibit no growth defect even on high concentrations of 3-AT (Figure 1—figure supplement 3B). Moreover, deletion of GCN4 does not affect frameshifting at CGA codon repeats in an asc1Δ mutant (Wolf and Grayhack, 2015). Thus, it is unlikely that the defect in reading frame maintenance in our mbf1 mutants is related to GCN4. However, Mbf1 has also been implicated in translation, based on isolation of mutations in yeast MBF1 that suppress frameshifting mutations (Hendrick et al., 2001), and the weak association of the archaeal homolog with ribosomes (Blombach et al., 2014), but there is no information on its molecular role in translation. Ribosomal protein Rps3 also mediates reading frame maintenance at CGA codon repeats To identify the mutated gene(s) in our dominant mutants, we performed whole genome sequencing in two MATα mutants and found that each mutant contains a single amino acid change (S104Y and G121D) in RPS3. Similarly, the two dominant MATa mutants also contain mutations in the RPS3 gene (L113F and a duplication of N22 to A30). RPS3 encodes a universally conserved ribosomal protein, a core component of the mRNA entry tunnel with a eukaryotic-specific C-terminal extension that interacts with Asc1 (Rabl et al., 2011). One known mutation in RPS3 (K108E) affects reading frame maintenance (Hendrick et al., 2001), while others affect different aspects of translation, from initiation to quality control (Dong et al., 2017; Graifer et al., 2014; Limoncelli et al., 2017; Takyar et al., 2005). The three residues S104, L113 and G121 implicated in reading frame maintenance in our study, as well as K108, are all found in two α-helices near the mRNA entry tunnel of the ribosome; these residues reside on the surface of the ribosome and could interact with mRNA or proteins outside of the ribosome (Figure 2A). Moreover, the identity of all four of these residues is conserved in eukaryotes, but different in bacteria and archaea (Graifer et al., 2014). Figure 2 with 1 supplement see all Download asset Open asset Ribosomal protein Rps3 mediates reading frame maintenance with Mbf1 at CGA codon repeats. (A) Left: Yeast ribosome from PDB: 3J78 (Svidritskiy et al., 2014) (light blue: small subunit; yellow: large subunit) showing Asc1/RACK1 (dark blue) and Rps3 (pink). Right: Residues of Rps3 in which mutations cause frameshifting are marked- S104 (yellow), K108 (green), L113 (black), G121 (gray). (B) Analysis of effects of RPS3-K108E, mbf1Δ and RPS3-K108E mbf1Δ mutations on expression of GFP/RFP protein (fluorescence), mRNA and protein/mRNA from reporters containing four Arg codons (AGA versus CGA) in-frame and in the +1 frame. (C) Assay for epistatic relationship between RPS3 mutations from this selection and the mbf1Δ mutation. (D) Overproduction of Mbf1 protein in indicated RPS3 mutants significantly decreased expression of frameshifted Gln4(1-99)-GFP fusion protein (***p < 0.001) analyzed by flow cytometry. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.39637.007 Figure 2—source data 1 (Source data file for Figure 2B–D). https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.39637.009 Download elife-39637-fig2-data1-v2.xlsx We initially examined the effect of the RPS3-K108E mutation on both frameshifting and in-frame expression downstream of CGA codon repeats, and found that this mutation allows frameshifting but does not affect in-frame expression. We chose the K108E mutation because it is known to have only minor effects on the polysome to monosome ratio (Dong et al., 2017), consistent with few nonspecific effects on translation. We introduced modified RNA-ID reporters into rps3Δ::bleR strains in which the only source of RPS3 is a plasmid-borne copy (either wild type or K108E). As described previously, since the expression of GFP and RFP is driven by the bi-directional GAL1,10 promoter, we use the ratio of GFP/RFP to reduce noise and cell type specific differences in induction of this promoter (Dean and Grayhack, 2012). Neither the RPS3 mutant nor a mbf1Δ mutant had a substantial effect on GFP/RFP fluorescence (protein), mRNA or protein/mRNA of reporters with CGA or AGA codon repeats in-frame (Figure 2B). We did note relatively minor, but compensatory effects, of the mutants on both GFP and RFP mRNAs (a 15–30% reduction in mbf1Δ mutants and a similar increase in the RPS3–K108E mutant) (Figure 2—figure supplement 1A). The RPS3-K108E and mbf1Δ mutants each caused substantially increased frameshifted GFP/RFP protein and protein/mRNA in the construct with four CGA codons, but had only small effects on GFP/RFP mRNA; no frameshifting was seen with four AGA codons (Figure 2B; Supplementary file 1). If Mbf1 and Rps3 proteins function in independent pathways to prevent frameshifting, we expected that RPS3-K108E mbf1Δ double mutants would frameshift more efficiently than either single mutant. Instead, we found that the double mutant RPS3-K108E mbf1Δ exhibited only a slight increase in frameshifted GFP/RFP protein; this increase is likely due to a slight increase in GFP/RFP mRNA relative to either single mutant, resulting in nearly identical protein/mRNA from the mbf1Δ and RPS3-K108E mbf1Δ mutants (Figure 2B, Figure 2—figure supplement 1B). We also examined effects of combining MBF1 mutants with other RPS3 mutants, S104Y and G121D from our selection, to determine epistasis. In these cases again, each single mutant exhibited frameshifting and the double mutants exhibited similar amounts of frameshifted GFP/RFP to that in the mbf1Δ strain, although even an additive effect would be easily detectable (Figure 2C). Thus, we think it is likely that Mbf1 and the two α-helices in the N-terminal Rps3 protein have related roles in reading frame maintenance. If Mbf1 and these two α-helices in Rps3 mediate a common function, then frameshifting in either RPS3-S104Y or G121D mutants might be suppressed by overproduction of MBF1. We found that introduction of additional copies of the MBF1 gene into either of these mutants resulted in reduced expression of frameshifted GFP (Figure 2D). Frameshifted GFP was reduced to 30% in the S104Y mutant and to 60% in the G121D mutant (Figure 2D). Similarly, growth on media lacking uracil was severely compromised in the RPS3-S104Y mutant when MBF1 was expressed on a multi-copy plasmid, relative to an empty vector control (Figure 2—figure supplement 1C), although both strains grow equally well on SD-Leu media. These observations are consistent with the idea that Mbf1 and Rps3 play similar roles in reading frame maintenance and support the idea that these RPS3 mutations reduce Mbf1 function. Mbf1 and Asc1 play distinct, but related, roles at CGA codon repeats Since Asc1 is also required for reading frame maintenance at CGA codon repeats (Wolf and Grayhack, 2015), we examined the relationship between MBF1 and ASC1 on both frameshifting and in-frame expression, comparing GFP/RFP in the single mutants to that in the asc1Δ mbf1Δ double mutant. Asc1 is known to affect expression (both in-frame and +1 frame) downstream of four CGA codons (Letzring et al., 2013; Wolf and Grayhack, 2015), but we previously noted that inhibitory effects of CGA codons are mediated by CGA codon pairs (Gamble et al., 2016; Letzring et al., 2010). Therefore, we compared the effects of these mutants on a set of reporters with three CGA-CGA (or AGA-AGA) codon pairs flanked by two non-Arg codons (Figure 3A, Figure 3—figure supplement 1A, Supplementary file 2) to effects on a set with four adjacent CGA (or AGA) codons (Figure 3—figure supplement 1B). Neither the upstream gene nor the arrangement of CGA codons affected the results. Figure 3 with 2 supplements see all Download asset Open asset Mbf1 and Asc1 play distinct, but related, roles at CGA codon pairs. (A) Analysis of effects of asc1Δ, mbf1Δ and asc1Δ mbf1Δ mutations on protein expression (fluorescence), mRNA levels and protein/mRNA of GLN4(1-99)-GFP reporters containing three CGA-CGA codon pairs in the 0, +1, and −1 reading frames. GFP/RFP values are reported in all cases. (B) Western analysis of Gln4(1-99)-GFP fusion protein in yeast strains from (A) indicates the expression of frameshifted Gln4(1-99)-GFP full-length protein in all three mutants. The protein was detected by anti-HA antibody recognizing the HA epitope between the codon insert and GFP. The GFP and RFP values were measured by flow cytometry while harvesting for cell lysis. (C) Overproduction of Mbf1 suppressed frameshifting at CGA-CGA codon pairs in the asc1Δ mutant, but did not affect the in-frame expression, based on GFP/RFP expression from the indicated reporters shown in (A). ns: p > 0.05, ***p < 0.001. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.39637.010 Figure 3—source data 1 Source data file for Figure 3A and C). https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.39637.013 Download elife-39637-fig3-data1-v2.xlsx As expected based on a previous report (Sitron et al., 2017), deletion of ASC1 resulted in increased protein and mRNA levels of reporters with in-frame CGA-CGA codon pairs. By contrast, deletion of MBF1 did not affect protein or mRNA levels su
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
-
Multi-protein Bridging Factor 1(Mbf1), Rps3 and Asc1 prevent stalled ribosomes from frameshifting
Jiyu Wang,Jie Zhou,Qidi Yang,Elizabeth J. Grayhack
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/366344
IF: 7.7
2018-01-01
eLife
Abstract:Stalled ribosomes in bacteria frameshift, but stalled ribosomes in eukaryotes do not frameshift and abort translation, suggesting that eukaryote-specific mechanisms might prevent frameshifting. We show that the conserved eukaryotic/archaeal protein Mbf1 acts with ribosomal proteins Rps3/uS3 and eukaryotic Asc1/RACK1 to prevent frameshifting at inhibitory CGA-CGA codon pairs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Mutations in RPS3 that allow frameshifting implicate eukaryotic conserved residues near the mRNA entry site. Mbf1 and Rps3 cooperate to maintain the reading frame of stalled ribosomes, while Asc1 mediates distinct events that result in aborted translation. Frameshifting occurs through a +1 shift with a CGA codon in the P site and involves competition between codons entering the A site, implying that the wobble interaction of the P site codon destabilizes translation elongation. Thus, eukaryotes have evolved unique mechanisms involving both a universally conserved ribosome component and two eukaryotic-specific proteins to maintain the reading frame at ribosome stalls.
-
mRNA reading frame maintenance during eukaryotic ribosome translocation
Nemanja Milicevic,Lasse Jenner,Alexander Myasnikov,Marat Yusupov,Gulnara Yusupova
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06780-4
IF: 64.8
Nature
Abstract:One of the most critical steps of protein synthesis is coupled translocation of messenger RNA (mRNA) and transfer RNAs (tRNAs) required to advance the mRNA reading frame by one codon. In eukaryotes, translocation is accelerated and its fidelity is maintained by elongation factor 2 (eEF2)1,2. At present, only a few snapshots of eukaryotic ribosome translocation have been reported3-5. Here we report ten high-resolution cryogenic-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structures of the elongating eukaryotic ribosome bound to the full translocation module consisting of mRNA, peptidyl-tRNA and deacylated tRNA, seven of which also contained ribosome-bound, naturally modified eEF2. This study recapitulates mRNA-tRNA2-growing peptide module progression through the ribosome, from the earliest states of eEF2 translocase accommodation until the very late stages of the process, and shows an intricate network of interactions preventing the slippage of the translational reading frame. We demonstrate how the accuracy of eukaryotic translocation relies on eukaryote-specific elements of the 80S ribosome, eEF2 and tRNAs. Our findings shed light on the mechanism of translation arrest by the anti-fungal eEF2-binding inhibitor, sordarin. We also propose that the sterically constrained environment imposed by diphthamide, a conserved eukaryotic posttranslational modification in eEF2, not only stabilizes correct Watson-Crick codon-anticodon interactions but may also uncover erroneous peptidyl-tRNA, and therefore contribute to higher accuracy of protein synthesis in eukaryotes.
-
Title: Toleration of Frameshift Mutations in Mrna Sequences Encoding the N-terminal Peptides of Bacterial Type III Effectors
Yejun Wang,Litao Yang,Moyang Lv,M. Y. Yu,Xinlong Wang,Ziyi Zhao,Lijun Luo,Xuxia Cai,Runhong Chen,Yueming Hu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.04.10.536236
2023-01-01
Abstract:Gram-negative bacteria deliver effector proteins into eukaryotic host cells through type III and type IV secretion systems, causing infections and diseases. It remains unclear about the signals guiding the specific secretion of the effectors. Here, we adopted an in silico approach to analyze the mRNA sequences encoding the putative peptides essential for effective secretion and translocation of type III and IV effectors. A surprisingly high proportion of type III effectors showed tolerance on frameshift mutations in signal-encoding mRNA sequences, and in contrast, very low percentage of type IV effectors showed the similar frameshift tolerance. The type III effectors with frameshift tolerance of secretion signals were widely distributed in effector or signal families and bacterial species. Natural frameshifts could be identified in type III effector genes, which were often remedied in time by nearby paired insertions or deletions. Frameshift-derived peptide sequences also retained the common properties present in the signal peptides of raw type III effectors. Natural language processing models were adopted to represent the common features in the mRNA sequences encoding N-terminal peptides of type III effectors or C-terminal peptides of type IV effectors, with which transfer learning models could well predict the effectors, especially type IV effectors. The observations in the study would facilitate us understand the nature and evolution of secretion signals of type III and IV effectors. Significance It has been a debate on the nature of signals for translocation of type III secreted effectors for a long time. Meanwhile, there has been no examination on the possibility of mRNA being as translocation signals for type IV or other types of secreted effectors. By computational simulation, the study demonstrated the protein nature of translocation signals for both type IV effectors and most type III effectors. Despite wide frameshift tolerance and atypical common features in mRNA sequences encoding the putative N-terminal signal sequences of type III effectors, more typical common physicochemical and amino acid composition properties between the mutation-derived and raw peptides, and the frequent self-correction phenomenon for naturally happening frameshifts supported the translocation signals at protein level of type III effectors. The common features in mRNA sequences encoding the translocation signal peptides of type III and IV effectors could also be combined in models for better prediction of the effectors respectively.
-
Translation with frameshifting of ribosome along mRNA transcript
Jingwei Li,Yunxin Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1502.02109
2015-02-07
Abstract:Translation is an important process for prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells to produce necessary proteins for cell growth. Numerious experiments have been performed to explore the translational properties. Diverse models have also been developed to determine the biochemical mechanism of translation. However, to simplify the majority of the existing models, the frameshifting of ribosome along the mRNA transcript is neglected, which actually occurs in real cells and has been extensively experimentally studied. The frameshifting of ribosome evidently influences the efficiency and speed of translation, considering that the peptide chains synthesized by shifted ribosomes will not fold into functional proteins and will degrade rapidly. In this study, a theoretical model is presented to describe the translational process based on the model for totally asymmetric simple exclusion process. In this model, the frameshifting of the ribosome along the mRNA transcript and the attachment/detachment of the ribosome to/from the main body of mRNA codons during translation elongation process, are explicitly included. The results show that, with ribosome frameshifing, the speed of correctly synthesized peptide chains may increase first and then decrease with both the translation initiation rate $\alpha$ and the ribosome detachment rate $\omega_d$. This results indicates that regulating the translation process to reach maximal synthesized speed of proteins is theoretically feasible. Traffic-related problems of ribosome motion along the mRNA transcript are also addressed theoretically. Depending on parameter values, shock wave (or domain wall) may exist for ribosome probabilities along the mRNA.
Biological Physics,Subcellular Processes
-
A new kinetic model reveals the synergistic effect of E-, P- and A-sites on +1 ribosomal frameshifting
Pei-Yu Liao,Prateek Gupta,Alexey N. Petrov,Jonathan D. Dinman,Kelvin H. Lee
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn100
IF: 14.9
2008-03-15
Nucleic Acids Research
Abstract:Programmed ribosomal frameshifting (PRF) is a process by which ribosomes produce two different polypeptides from the same mRNA. In this study, we propose three different kinetic models of +1 PRF, incorporating the effects of the ribosomal E-, P- and A-sites toward promoting efficient +1 frameshifting in Escherichia coli. Specifically, the timing of E-site tRNA dissociation is discussed within the context of the kinetic proofreading mechanism of aminoacylated tRNA (aa-tRNA) selection. Mathematical modeling using previously determined kinetic rate constants reveals that destabilization of deacylated tRNA in the E-site, rearrangement of peptidyl-tRNA in the P-site, and availability of cognate aa-tRNA corresponding to the A-site act synergistically to promote efficient +1 PRF. The effect of E-site codon:anticodon interactions on +1 PRF was also experimentally examined with a dual fluorescence reporter construct. The combination of predictive modeling and empirical testing allowed the rate constant for P-site tRNA slippage (k(s)) to be estimated as k(s) approximately 1.9 s(-1) for the release factor 2 (RF2) frameshifting sequence. These analyses suggest that P-site tRNA slippage is the driving force for +1 ribosomal frameshifting while the presence of a 'hungry codon' in the A-site and destabilization in the E-site further enhance +1 PRF in E. coli.
biochemistry & molecular biology
-
Frameshifting in the synthesis of Escherichia coli polypeptide chain release factor two on eukaryotic ribosomes
J M Williams,B C Donly,C M Brown,F M Adamski,C N Trotman,W P Tate
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1989.tb15237.x
1989-12-22
Abstract:A translational frameshift is necessary in the synthesis of Escherichia coli release factor 2 (RF-2) to bypass an in-frame termination codon within the coding sequence. The nucleotide sequence preceding the in-phase stop codon within RF-2 mRNA is complementary to the 3' anti-(Shine-Dalgarno sequence) region found in prokaryotic 16S rRNA and Weiss et al. (1988) have concluded that this pairing triggers the frameshift event. In vitro production of RNA coding for RF-2, suitable for translation on eukaryotic ribosomes, has enabled testing of whether eukaryotic ribosomes can frameshift at this sequence. The 18S rRNA of eukaryotic ribosomes does not contain the 3' anti-(Shine-Dalgarno sequence) region. The prokaryotic RF-2 gene and the gene for the other release factor, RF-1, which does not contain an in-frame stop codon, were subcloned into transcription vectors such that the RNA transcripts produced in vitro would resemble a typical eukaryotic mRNA. These RF-1 and RF-2 RNAs both synthesized a major product of Mr approximately 45,000 when translated in vitro within reticulocyte lysate; the size expected for full length RF-1 and RF-2 molecules. The RF-2 product was immunoprecipitated by RF-2-specific antibodies, including those to regions of the protein encoded in the mRNA downstream from the frameshift site. The putative premature termination product, an oligopeptide of 25 amino acids, was not detected, but a chemically synthesized derivative was shown to be very unstable within the translation system. Although it was not possible therefore to calculate an absolute efficiency of frameshifting, the relative efficiency of the translation of RF-2 RNA was estimated to be 10-20% of that of RF-1 RNA in the reticulocyte system. This was similar to the relative synthesis of the two proteins in a plasmid-DNA-directed prokaryotic transcription/translation system. These results show that in vitro on eukaryotic ribosomes where the Shine-Dalgarno-type interaction is not possible, high efficiency frameshifting around the in-phase stop codon in the RF-2 mRNA can still occur.
-
Twice exploration of tRNA +1 frameshifting in an elongation cycle of protein synthesis
Howard Gamper,Yujia Mao,Isao Masuda,Henri McGuigan,Gregor Blaha,Yuhong Wang,Shoujun Xu,Ya-Ming Hou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab734
2021-09-27
Abstract:Inducing tRNA +1 frameshifting to read a quadruplet codon has the potential to incorporate a non-natural amino acid into the polypeptide chain. While this strategy is being considered for genome expansion in biotechnology and bioengineering endeavors, a major limitation is a lack of understanding of where the shift occurs in an elongation cycle of protein synthesis. Here, we use the high-efficiency +1-frameshifting SufB2 tRNA, containing an extra nucleotide in the anticodon loop, to address this question. Physical and kinetic measurements of the ribosome reading frame of SufB2 identify twice exploration of +1 frameshifting in one elongation cycle, with the major fraction making the shift during translocation from the aminoacyl-tRNA binding (A) site to the peptidyl-tRNA binding (P) site and the remaining fraction making the shift within the P site upon occupancy of the A site in the +1-frame. We demonstrate that the twice exploration of +1 frameshifting occurs during active protein synthesis and that each exploration is consistent with ribosomal conformational dynamics that permits changes of the reading frame. This work indicates that the ribosome itself is a determinant of changes of the reading frame and reveals a mechanistic parallel of +1 frameshifting with -1 frameshifting.
-
A mechanistic model for +1 frameshifts in eubacteria
Lalit Ponnala,Donald Bitzer,Anne Stomp,Mladen Vouk
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0712.2068
2007-12-13
Abstract:This work applies the methods of signal processing and the concepts of control system design to model the maintenance and modulation of reading frame in the process of protein synthesis. The model shows how translational speed can modulate translational accuracy to accomplish programmed +1 frameshifts and could have implications for the regulation of translational efficiency. A series of free energy estimates were calculated from the ribosome's interaction with mRNA sequences during the process of translation elongation in eubacteria. A sinusoidal pattern of roughly constant phase was detected in these free energy signals. Signal phase was identified as a useful parameter for locating programmed +1 frameshifts encoded in bacterial genes for release factor 2. A displacement model was developed that captures the mechanism of frameshift based on the information content of the signal parameters and the relative abundance of tRNA in the bacterial cell. Results are presented using experimentally verified frameshift genes across eubacteria.
Genomics
-
Conserved +1 translational frameshifting in the gene encoding YPL034W
Ivaylo P. Ivanov,Swati Gaikwad,Alan G. Hinnebusch,Thomas E Dever
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.29.069534
2024-08-22
Abstract:Living cells have developed exquisite mechanisms to ensure accurate translation of mRNA. Many of them are dedicated to preventing the change in reading frame during translation elongation. A minority of chromosomally encoded genes have evolved sequences that subvert standard decoding to program +1 translational frameshifting, either constitutively or in response to external stimuli. In the yeast , three chromosomal genes are known to employ programmed +1 translational frameshifting for expression of full-length functional products. Here we identify a fourth yeast gene, , encompassing the existing predicted open reading frame , with conserved programmed +1 frameshifting. Like the previously known examples, it appears to exploit peculiarities in tRNA abundance in .
Molecular Biology
-
Implication of nucleotides near the 3′ end of 16S rRNA in guarding the translational reading frame
Alexandria Smart,Laura Lancaster,John Paul Donohue,Dustin Niblett,Harry F Noller,Harry F Noller
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkae143
IF: 14.9
2024-03-08
Nucleic Acids Research
Abstract:Loss of the translational reading frame leads to misincorporation and premature termination, which can have lethal consequences. Based on structural evidence that A1503 of 16S rRNA intercalates between specific mRNA bases, we tested the possibility that it plays a role in maintenance of the reading frame by constructing ribosomes with an abasic nucleotide at position 1503. This was done by specific cleavage of 16S rRNA at position 1493 using the colicin E3 endonuclease and replacing the resulting 3′-terminal 49mer fragment with a synthetic oligonucleotide containing the abasic site using a novel splinted RNA ligation method. Ribosomes reconstituted from the abasic 1503 16S rRNA were highly active in protein synthesis but showed elevated levels of spontaneous frameshifting into the -1 reading frame. We then asked whether the residual frameshifting persisting in control ribosomes containing an intact A1503 is due to the absence of the N6-dimethyladenosine modifications at positions 1518 and 1519. Indeed, this frameshifting was rescued by site-specific methylation in vitro by the ksgA methylase. These findings thus implicate two different sites near the 3′ end of 16S rRNA in maintenance of the translational reading frame, providing yet another example of a functional role for ribosomal RNA in protein synthesis.
biochemistry & molecular biology
-
Spontaneous Ribosomal Translocation of Mrna and Trnas into a Chimeric Hybrid State
Jie Zhou,Laura Lancaster,John Paul Donohue,Harry F. Noller
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1901310116
2019-01-01
Abstract:Significance The crystal structure of a pretranslocation complex containing mRNA and two tRNAs shows spontaneous movement of the mRNA and tRNAs from the classical state to a chimeric hybrid state in the absence of elongation factor G (EF-G) or GTP. This finding suggests that many steps of translocation, including rotation of the 30S subunit head domain and movement of the A-site tRNA into the position of the classical-state P-site tRNA, are supported by the ribosome itself. However, movement of mRNA and tRNA has become uncoupled, resulting in negative slippage of the translational reading frame. These findings have implications for our current view of the role of EF-G, suggesting that its main function may be to stabilize codon–anticodon pairing during translocation. The elongation factor G (EF-G)–catalyzed translocation of mRNA and tRNA through the ribosome is essential for vacating the ribosomal A site for the next incoming aminoacyl-tRNA, while precisely maintaining the translational reading frame. Here, the 3.2-Å crystal structure of a ribosome translocation intermediate complex containing mRNA and two tRNAs, formed in the absence of EF-G or GTP, provides insight into the respective roles of EF-G and the ribosome in translocation. Unexpectedly, the head domain of the 30S subunit is rotated by 21°, creating a ribosomal conformation closely resembling the two-tRNA chimeric hybrid state that was previously observed only in the presence of bound EF-G. The two tRNAs have moved spontaneously from their A/A and P/P binding states into ap/P and pe/E states, in which their anticodon loops are bound between the 30S body domain and its rotated head domain, while their acceptor ends have moved fully into the 50S P and E sites, respectively. Remarkably, the A-site tRNA translocates fully into the classical P-site position. Although the mRNA also undergoes movement, codon–anticodon interaction is disrupted in the absence of EF-G, resulting in slippage of the translational reading frame. We conclude that, although movement of both tRNAs and mRNA (along with rotation of the 30S head domain) can occur in the absence of EF-G and GTP, EF-G is essential for enforcing coupled movement of the tRNAs and their mRNA codons to maintain the reading frame.
-
Ribosomes modulate transcriptome abundance via generalized frameshift and out-of-frame mRNA decay
Yujie Zhang,Lilit Nersisyan,Eliska Fürst,Ioannis Alexopoulos,Susanne Huch,Claudio Bassot,Elena Garre,Per Sunnerhagen,Ilaria Piazza,Vicent Pelechano
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.12.584696
2024-03-12
Abstract:Cells need to adapt their transcriptome to quickly match cellular needs in changing environments. mRNA abundance can be controlled by altering both its synthesis and decay. Here we show how, in response to poor nutritional conditions, the bulk of the transcriptome undergoes -1 ribosome frameshifts and experiences an accelerated out-of-frame co-translational mRNA decay. Using RNA metabolic labelling, we demonstrate that in poor nutritional conditions, NMD-dependent degradation represents at least one third of the total mRNA decay. We further characterize this mechanism and identify low codon optimality as a key factor for ribosomes to induce out-of-frame mRNA decay. Finally, we show that this phenomenon is conserved from bacteria to humans. Our work provides evidence for a direct regulatory feedback mechanism coupling protein demand with the control of mRNA abundance to limit cellular growth and expands the functional role of mRNA quality control.
Molecular Biology
-
Translational Control by Ribosome Pausing in Bacteria: How a Non-uniform Pace of Translation Affects Protein Production and Folding
Ekaterina Samatova,Jan Daberger,Marija Liutkute,Marina V. Rodnina
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.619430
IF: 5.2
2021-01-11
Frontiers in Microbiology
Abstract:Protein homeostasis of bacterial cells is maintained by coordinated processes of protein production, folding, and degradation. Translational efficiency of a given mRNA depends on how often the ribosomes initiate synthesis of a new polypeptide and how quickly they read the coding sequence to produce a full-length protein. The pace of ribosomes along the mRNA is not uniform: periods of rapid synthesis are separated by pauses. Here, we summarize recent evidence on how ribosome pausing affects translational efficiency and protein folding. We discuss the factors that slow down translation elongation and affect the quality of the newly synthesized protein. Ribosome pausing emerges as important factor contributing to the regulatory programs that ensure the quality of the proteome and integrate the cellular and environmental cues into regulatory circuits of the cell.
microbiology
-
Mutations in domain IV of elongation factor EF-G confer-1 frameshifting
Dustin Niblett,Charlotte Nelson,Calvin S. Leung,Gillian Rexroad,Jake Cozy,Jie Zhou,Laura Lancaster,Harry F. Noller
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1261/rna.077339.120
2021-01-01
RNA
Abstract:A recent crystal structure of a ribosome complex undergoing partial translocation in the absence of elongation factor EF-G showed disruption of codon-anticodon pairing and slippage of the reading frame by -1, directly implicating EF-G in preservation of the translational reading frame. Among mutations identified in a random screen for dominant-lethal mutations of EF-G were a cluster of six that map to the tip of domain IV, which has been shown to contact the codon-anticodon duplex in trapped translocation intermediates. In vitro synthesis of a full-length protein using these mutant EF-Gs revealed dramatically increased -1 frameshifting, providing new evidence for a role for domain IV of EF-G in maintaining the reading frame. These mutations also caused decreased rates of mRNA translocation and rotational movement of the head and body domains of the 30S ribosomal subunit during translocation. Our results are in general agreement with recent findings from Rodnina and coworkers based on in vitro translation of an oligopeptide using EF-Gs containing mutations at two positions in domain IV, who found an inverse correlation between the degree of frameshifting and rates of translocation. Four of our six mutations are substitutions at positions that interact with the translocating tRNA, in each case contacting the RNA backbone of the anticodon loop. We suggest that EF-G helps to preserve the translational reading frame by preventing uncoupled movement of the tRNA through these contacts; a further possibility is that these interactions may stabilize a conformation of the anticodon that favors base-pairing with its codon.
-
Elongation factor P controls ribosomal frameshift of a antimicrobial resistance gene
Seungwoo Baek,Yong-Joon Cho,Eunna Choi,Soomin Choi,Eun-Jin Lee
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.11.612453
2024-09-11
Abstract:Ribosomes translate mRNAs by matching every 3-nucleotide sequence in mRNA, producing the corresponding proteins. As the amino acid sequence directly dictates the activity of the protein, frameshifts often lead to unexpected effects. Here, ribosome profiling reveals that the intracellular pathogen Typhimurium suppresses frameshift in the antimicrobial resistance gene during translation. This suppression of frameshift is mediated by a ribosome pause occurring in a newly-identified overlapping gene, serving as a non-slip bump. Given that the pause site contains a poly-proline motif and can be resolved by elongation factor P, the removal of the ribosome pause by substituting the motif induces ribosome slippage in , resulting in UgtL frameshifted protein production. This renders sensitive to antimicrobial peptides but, in turn, protects the MgtC virulence factor from the FtsH-mediated proteolysis, indicating that elongation factor P-dependent ribosome pause is required for controlling both full antimicrobial resistance and mouse virulence. These findings reveal a new regulatory mechanism in which ribosome pause controls the production of two different protein isoforms by suppressing ribosome slippage-mediated frameshift.
Microbiology
-
Alternative Mode of E-Site tRNA Binding in the Presence of a Downstream mRNA Stem Loop at the Entrance Channel
Yan Zhang,Samuel Hong,Ajchareeya Ruangprasert,Georgios Skiniotis,Christine M. Dunham
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2018.01.013
IF: 5.871
2018-01-01
Structure
Abstract:Structured mRNAs positioned downstream of the ribosomal decoding center alter gene expression by slowing protein synthesis. Here, we solved the cryo-EM structure of the bacterial ribosome bound to an mRNA containing a 3′ stem loop that regulates translation. Unexpectedly, the E-site tRNA adopts two distinct orientations. In the first structure, normal interactions with the 50S and 30S E site are observed. However, in the second structure, although the E-site tRNA makes normal interactions with the 50S E site, its anticodon stem loop moves ∼54 Å away from the 30S E site to interact with the 30S head domain and 50S uL5. This position of the E-site tRNA causes the uL1 stalk to adopt a more open conformation that likely represents an intermediate state during E-site tRNA dissociation. These results suggest that structured mRNAs at the entrance channel restrict 30S subunit movement required during translation to slow E-site tRNA dissociation.
-
Eukaryotic release factor 1 from Euplotes promotes frameshifting at premature stop codons in human cells
Bozhidar-Adrian Stefanov,Elvis Ajuh,Sarah Allen,Mariusz Nowacki
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2024.109413
IF: 5.8
2024-04-01
iScience
Abstract:Human physiology is highly susceptible to frameshift mutations within coding regions, and many hereditary diseases and cancers are caused by such indels. Presently, therapeutic options to counteract them are limited and, in the case of direct genome editing, risky. Here, we show that release factor 1 (eRF1) from Euplotes, an aquatic protist known for frequent +1 frameshifts in its coding regions, can enhance +1 ribosomal frameshifting at slippery heptameric sequences in human cells without an apparent requirement for an mRNA secondary structure. We further show an increase in frameshifting rate at the premature termination sequence found in the HEXA gene of Tay-Sachs disease patients, or a breast cancer cell line that harbors a tumor-driving frameshift mutation in GATA3. Although the overall increase in frameshifting would need further improvement for clinical applications, our results underscore the potential of exogenous factors, such as Eu eRF1, to increase frameshifting in human cells.
multidisciplinary sciences
-
Programmed ribosomal frameshifting during PLEKHM2 mRNA decoding generates a constitutively active mediator of kinesin-1-dependent lysosome transport
Yousuf A Khan,Raffaella De Pace,Irwin Jungreis,Gionmattia Carancini,Jonathan M Mudge,Ji Wang,Manolis Kellis,John F Atkins,Pavel V Baranov,Andrew E Firth,Juan S Bonifacino,Gary Loughran
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.30.610563
2024-08-31
bioRxiv
Abstract:Programmed ribosomal frameshifting is a translational recoding phenomenon in which a proportion of ribosomes are stimulated to slip backwards or forwards on an mRNA1, rephasing the ribosome relative to the mRNA. While frameshifting is often employed by viruses2, very few phylogenetically conserved examples are known in vertebrate genes and the evidence for some of these is controversial3,4. Here we report a +1 frameshifting signal in the coding sequence of the human gene PLEKHM2, encoding the ARL8-dependent, lysosome-kinesin-1 adaptor protein PLEKHM25. This +1 frameshifting signal, UCC_UUU_CGG, is highly conserved in vertebrates and exhibits an influenza virus-like frameshift motif with similar efficiency6,7. Purification and mass spectrometry of GFP-tagged trans-frame protein from cells confirms frameshifting. Structure prediction shows that the new C-terminal domain generated by this frameshift forms an alpha-helix. This additional domain relieves PLEKHM2 from autoinhibition, allowing it to move to the tips of cells via association with kinesin-1 without requiring activation by ARL8. Thus, the frameshift proteoform generates a constitutively active adaptor of kinesin-1.
-
The evolution and functional significance of the programmed ribosomal frameshift in prfB
Cassidy R Prince,Isabella N Lin,Heather A Feaga
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.24.614795
2024-09-25
Abstract:Release Factor 2 (RF2) is one of two peptide release factors that terminate translation in bacteria. In Escherichia coli, the gene encoding RF2, prfB, contains an in-frame premature RF2-specific stop codon. Therefore, a programmed ribosomal frameshift is required to translate full-length RF2. Here, we investigate the diversity of prfB frameshifting through bioinformatic analyses of >12,000 genomes. We present evidence that prfB frameshifting autoregulates RF2 levels throughout the bacterial domain since (i) the prfB in-frame stop codon is always TGA or TAA, both of which are recognized by RF2, and never the RF1-specific TAG stop codon, and (ii) species that lack the autoregulatory programmed frameshift likely need higher RF2 levels since, on average, they have significantly higher RF2-specific stop codon usage. Overexpression of prfB without the autoregulatory frameshift motif is toxic to Bacillus subtilis, an organism with intermediate RF2-specific stop codon usage. We did not detect the programmed frameshift in any Actinobacteriota. Consistent with this finding, we observed very low frameshift efficiency at the prfB frameshift motif in the Actinobacterium Mycobacterium smegmatis. Our work provides a more complete picture of the evolution of the RF2 programmed frameshifting motif, and its usage to prevent toxic overexpression of RF2.
Microbiology
-
Molecular mechanism of translational stalling by inhibitory codon combinations and poly(A) tracts.
Petr Tesina,Laura N Lessen,Robert Buschauer,Jingdong Cheng,Colin Chih-Chien Wu,Otto Berninghausen,Allen R Buskirk,Thomas Becker,Roland Beckmann,Rachel Green
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.2019103365
2019-01-01
The EMBO Journal
Abstract:Inhibitory codon pairs and poly(A) tracts within the translated mRNA cause ribosome stalling and reduce protein output. The molecular mechanisms that drive these stalling events, however, are still unknown. Here, we use a combination of in vitro biochemistry, ribosome profiling, and cryo-EM to define molecular mechanisms that lead to these ribosome stalls. First, we use an in vitro reconstituted yeast translation system to demonstrate that inhibitory codon pairs slow elongation rates which are partially rescued by increased tRNA concentration or by an artificial tRNA not dependent on wobble base-pairing. Ribosome profiling data extend these observations by revealing that paused ribosomes with empty A sites are enriched on these sequences. Cryo-EM structures of stalled ribosomes provide a structural explanation for the observed effects by showing decoding-incompatible conformations of mRNA in the A sites of all studied stall- and collision-inducing sequences. Interestingly, in the case of poly(A) tracts, the inhibitory conformation of the mRNA in the A site involves a nucleotide stacking array. Together, these data demonstrate a novel mRNA-induced mechanisms of translational stalling in eukaryotic ribosomes.