Distinct Pairing Symmetries Innd1.85ce0.15cuo4−yandla1…

Lei Shan,Yuan Huang,Hong Gao,Yetang Wang,Shiliang Li,Pengcheng Dai,Fang Zhou,Jiang Xiong,Wenxin Ti,H. H. Wen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.72.144506
2005-01-01
Abstract:We used point-contact tunneling spectroscopy to study the superconducting pairing symmetry of electron-doped ${\mathrm{Nd}}_{1.85}{\mathrm{Ce}}_{0.15}{\mathrm{CuO}}_{4\ensuremath{-}y}$ (NCCO) and hole-doped ${\mathrm{La}}_{1.89}{\mathrm{Sr}}_{0.11}{\mathrm{CuO}}_{4}$ (LSCO). Nearly identical spectra without zero bias conductance peak (ZBCP) were obtained on the (110) and (100) oriented surfaces (the so-called nodal and anti-nodal directions) of NCCO. In contrast, LSCO showed a remarkable ZBCP in the nodal direction as expected from a $d$-wave superconductor. Detailed analysis reveals an $s$-wave component in the pairing symmetry of the NCCO sample with $\ensuremath{\Delta}∕{k}_{B}{T}_{c}=1.66$, a value remarkably close to that of a weakly coupled Bardeen-Cooper-Schriffer (BCS) superconductor. We argue that this $s$-wave component is formed at the Fermi surface pockets centered at $(\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}\ensuremath{\pi},0)$ and $(0,\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}\ensuremath{\pi})$ although a $d$-wave component may also exist.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?