Kinetic Schemes for Post-Synchronized Single Molecule Dynamics

Chunlai Chen,Joseph M. Laakso,E. Michael Ostap,Yale E. Goldman,Henry Shuman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2011.11.975
IF: 3.4
2012-01-01
Biophysical Journal
Abstract:Recordings of force, fluorescence, or ionic membrane current from single molecules show directly their individual trajectories, but many events need to be aggregated to obtain reaction paths and mean kinetic parameters. A procedure termed ‘post-synchronization’ has been developed to combine individual interactions that are either noisy or complicated by successive states that have similar signals. To create a post-synchronized ensemble, many trajectories are temporally lined up at an identifiable ‘trigger’ transition and averaged revealing the dynamics of the process leading up to and following the synchronized transition. Averaged recordings following a trigger have the same properties as an ensemble perturbation experiment, i.e., rate constants can be determined similarly to temperature jump or rapid mixing experiments. However, determining rate constants from averaged recordings leading up to aligned trigger transitions is not as straightforward if the reaction has reversible steps or branches. The averaged traces have properties of a time-reversed kinetic scheme. A general method to determine rate constants for the “reversed time” scheme leading up to the trigger is the following: (0) Add a reaction to complete the enzymatic cycle, if necessary. (1) Solve the relative steady state concentrations. (2) Calculate the transition rates for the time-reversed scheme from P(Ai | Bi+1) = P(A) P(Bi+1 | Ai) / P(B), where P(A) and P(B) are steady-state occupancies, P(Bi+1 | Ai) is a normal forward transition probability of entering state B from state A, and P(Ai | Bi+1) is the time-reversed transition probability that it was in A given it's in B at a later time. (3) Estimate the kinetics of the “time-reversed” perturbation experiment using the rate constants determined in step (2). Supported by NIH grants P01-GM087253 and R01-GM080376.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?