Abstract:The rapid technological advancements for high‐throughput sequencing and omics analyses have enabled soil microbiology to enter into a big data era across the ever‐increasing temporal and spatial scales. However, there are significant dilemmas when bridging laboratory‐, field‐, and model‐based data sources for an advanced understanding of soil microbiology. We discussed the reasons for the dilemmas and proposed several suggestions for the future research priorities. These dilemmas should motivate interdisciplinary collaboration across experimental, observational, theoretic, and modeling research. Soil microbiology has entered into the big data era, but the challenges in bridging laboratory‐, field‐, and model‐based studies of ecosystem functions still remain. Indeed, the limitation of factors in laboratory experiments disregards interactions of a broad range of in situ environmental drivers leading to frequent contradictions between laboratory‐ and field‐based studies, which may consequently mislead model development and projections. Upscaling soil microbiology research from laboratory to ecosystems represents one of the grand challenges facing environmental scientists, but with great potential to inform policymakers toward climate‐smart and resource‐efficient ecosystems. The upscaling is not only a scale problem, but also requires disentangling functional relationships and processes on each level. We point to three potential reasons for the gaps between laboratory‐ and field‐based studies (i.e., spatiotemporal dynamics, sampling disturbances, and plant–soil–microbial feedbacks), and three key issues of caution when bridging observations and model predictions (i.e., across‐scale effect, complex‐process coupling, and multi‐factor regulation). Field‐based studies only cover a limited range of environmental variation that must be supplemented by laboratory and mesocosm manipulative studies when revealing the underlying mechanisms. The knowledge gaps in upscaling soil microbiology from laboratory to ecosystems should motivate interdisciplinary collaboration across experimental, observational, theoretic, and modeling research.

Scaling Issues in Soil-plant-atmosphere Continuum

Simulation of Dynamic Root Growth and Water Transfer in Soil-Crop-atmosphere System

Soil-plant-atmosphere interactions: structure, function, and predictive scaling for climate change mitigation

Advancing understanding of land–atmosphere interactions by breaking discipline and scale barriers

Integrated Modeling of Photosynthesis and Transfer of Energy, Mass and Momentum in the Soil-Plant-Atmosphere Continuum System

Uncovering Scale Effects on Spatial Patterns and Interactions of Multiple Cropland Ecosystem Services

Scale Criticality in Estimating Ecosystem Carbon Dynamics.

Vegetation-climate feedbacks across scales

Numerical simulation of the evapotranspiration process in the soil-vegetation-atmosphere continuum

Water scaling of ecosystem carbon cycle feedback to climate warming

Progress of vegetation modelling and future research prospects

A Model Investigation of Vegetation-Atmosphere Interactions on a Millennial Timescale

A new modeling method to quantify aerosol-induced vegetation-climate biophysical feedbacks

Effects of Vegetation Heterogeneity and Surface Topography on Spatial Scaling of Net Primary Productivity

Soil moisture-atmosphere feedback dominates land carbon uptake variability

Soil water balance and ecosystem response to climate change

Interactions between terrestrial ecosystem water and carbon cycles and their simulation methods: A review

The importance of scale‐dependent groundwater processes in land‐atmosphere interactions over the central United States

Challenges in upscaling laboratory studies to ecosystems in soil microbiology research

Conflicting Drivers of Land Carbon Uptake Variability Reconciled by Land-Atmosphere Coupling

Effects of Spatial Heterogeneity in Rainfall and Vegetation Type on Soil Moisture and Evapotranspiration