Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To investigate the biomechanical effects of different bone cement diffusion patterns in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.METHODS:One volunteer with L1 osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture was selected, male, aged 68 years old, heighed 172 cm, weighted 60 kg, and healthy before. CT scans were used from T10-L5, CT data was extracted with Mimics software, and Geomagic wrap and Solidworks were used to model, and the three-dimensional finite element model (T12-L2) of preoperative osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in the thoracolumbar segment was established. Similarly, the situations of bone cement dispersion in vertebroplasty were simulated (the situations of bone cement dispersion had the three kinds, including the bone cement not contacts with upper and lower endplates, the bone cement only contacts with upper endplates, and the bone cement contacts with upper and lower endplates). According to different diffusion situations, five types of loads were applied to the model:upright, upright plus forward flexion, upright plus backward extension, upright plus left bending, upright plus right rotation. Meanwhile, the model was compared with the cementless lumbar spine model, and the deformation and stress distribution of each model under load were recorded and compared.RESULTS:After the establishing the finite element model of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture in the thoracolumbar segment, it was found that the deformation of three different bone cement distribution models above was not significantly different. In L1 cancellous bone, the Von Mises stress of the cementless lumbar spine group was significantly higher than that of the cemented group. Among the three groups of different bone cement injection situations, the Von Mises stress in the group of bone cement contacts with upper and lower endplates was the lowest, followed by the group of bone cement only contacts with upper endplates, and the highest Von Mises stress was the group that bone cement contacts neither the upper or lower endplates. In the comparison of bone cement stress, the Von Mises stress in the group of bone cement contacts with upper and lower endplates was significantly higher than the other two groups (upright 12.375 MPa, upright plus forward flexion 16.411 MPa, upright plus backward extension 16.801 MPa, upright plus left bending 13.425 MPa, upright plus right rotation 13.014 MPa), and the Von Mises stress in the group of bone cement does not contact with upper and lower endplates was the lowest.CONCLUSION:The bone cement contact with both upper and lower endplates can effectively absorb and transfer the stress level brought by the load, reduce the stress level of cancellous bone, and reduce the possibility of refracture of the operative vertebral body.

BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON OF CORTOSS AND SPINEPLEX CEMENTS IN VERTEBROPLASTY

CEMENT DISTRIBUTION CAN INFLUENCE THE MECHANICAL OUTCOME OF VERTEBROPLASTY

HOW DOES CEMENT VOLUME INFLUENCE THE MECHANICAL EFFECTS OF VERTEBROPLASTY

Biomechanical Effects of Different Bone Cement Diffusion Patterns after Vertebroplasty:Finite Element Analysis

Effect of percutaneous kyphoplasty bone cement injection on biomechanics of adjacent lumbar spine in animal models with osteoporosis

Effect of cement volume on biomechanical response of a spine segment treated with a PEEK polymer implant: a finite element comparative study with vertebroplasty

Finite element analysis of biomechanical effects of mineralized collagen modified bone cement on adjacent vertebral body after vertebroplasty

Biomechanical Behavior of Injected Cement Spacers versus Traditional Cages in Low-Density Lumbar Spine under Compression Loading

The biomechanical influence of vertebroplasty on the adjacent vertebral body and intervertebral disc

Posterior spinal stabilization: A biomechanical comparison of Laminar Hook Fusion to a Pedicle Screw System

Biomechanical Effects of Cement Volume on Treatment of Thoracolumbar Compression Fracture with Vertebroplasty

Biomechanical Effect of Different Posterior Fixation Techniques on Stability and Adjacent Segment Degeneration in Treating Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture With Osteoporosis: A Finite Element Analysis

Biomechanical study of different bone cement distribution on osteoporotic vertebral compression Fracture-A finite element analysis

Biomechanical comparative study of midline cortical vs. traditional pedicle screw trajectory in osteoporotic bone

A meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of mineralized collagen-polymethylmethacrylate and polymethylmethacrylate bone cements in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures

A 20-Year Review of Biomechanical Experimental Studies on Spine Implants Used for Percutaneous Surgical Repair of Vertebral Compression Fractures

Finite element analysis of vertebroplasty in the osteoporotic T11‐L1 vertebral body: Effects of bone cement formulation

Biomechanical Comparison of Corticopedicular Spine Fixation versus Pedicle Screw Fixation in a Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Finite Element Analysis Model

Influence of Screw Length and Cement Position Within the Injured Vertebra on Fixation Strength in Short-Segment Fixation of Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures

Biomechanical Study of Porcine Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture Model Strengthened by Trajectory-Adjustable Bone Cement Filling Device

VERTEBROPLASTY USING SMALL INJECTION VOLUMES CAN NORMALISE STRESS DISTRIBUTION ON THE VERTEBRAL BODIES AND REDUCE CEMENT LEAKAGE