Does Monitoring Promote or Impair Employee Job Performance and Wellbeing: A Motivational Perspective
Yi Su,Yanran Fang,Shenjiang Mo,Wenqing Yu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amproc.2023.14941abstract
2023-01-01
Academy of Management Proceedings
Abstract:Using monitoring to improve employees’ job performance is increasingly common in current management practices. Yet, whether monitoring can play an effective role in enhancing employees’ performance is inconclusive in the literature. Meanwhile, researchers are increasingly discovering that monitoring has detrimental impacts on employees’ well-being, such as increasing their emotional exhaustion. To help reconcile mixed findings about monitoring’s influences on employees’ job performance (i.e., task performance and OCB) and well-being (i.e., emotional exhaustion), we adopt self-determination theory to elucidate the motivational mechanism linking monitoring to task performance, OCB and emotional exhaustion. Specifically, this study suggests that monitoring activates employees’ impression motivation and constrains their intrinsic motivation. Both motivations subsequently promote employees’ task performance and OCB. Meanwhile, impression motivation also increases employees’ emotional exhaustion, whereas intrinsic motivation reduces employees’ emotional exhaustion. Additionally, employees’ prior task performance moderates the relationship between monitoring and two motivations, such that the positive relationship between monitoring and impression motivation becomes weaker, and the negative relationship between monitoring and intrinsic motivation becomes stronger when employees’ prior task performance is high. We collected three-wave data from 504 participants and their direct supervisors at a large retail company, and the results confirmed our hypothesized relationships. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings were discussed.