Abstract:Objectives Geological hazards not only cause serious economic losses and ecological damage, but also threaten the survival of mankind. The evaluation of geological hazard susceptibility is the basis of risk assessment of geological hazards. Previous studies focused on the selection of susceptibility assessment methods, but less on how to classify the susceptibility index of geological hazards. However, there is no good quantitative classification standard for the susceptibility of geological hazards in the current research results. Methods Taking Wenchuan County of Sichuan Province as an example, twelve widely used factors affecting geological hazard susceptibility was selected, and the susceptibility assessment was carried out by using the information quantity model. The evaluation accuracy of the model was tested by the success rate curve. We proposed a quantitative classification standard for susceptibility. The susceptibility index is a cumulative curve of the proportion of geological hazards in descending order, and the susceptibility index is divided into five intervals: 5% of historical disaster points (low-prone), the remaining 10% (medium-prone), the remaining 20% (high-prone), and the remaining 65% (very-high). Results The method of cumulative proportion subsection of historical geological hazards was compared with other eight methods and the accuracy of classification is verified. The results showed that the evaluation accuracy of the model was checked by two methods of validating the sample success rate curve and the non-disaster point sample success rate curve, and the rationality of the prediction results of the evaluation model was determined. The cumulative proportion subsection method of historical geological hazards showed good reasonableness in three ways: The proportion accuracy verification of vulnerable classification area, the frequency ratio accuracy verification of geological hazards and the location classification accuracy verification of geological hazards. It was the best classification standard in nine classification methods. Conclusions The quantitative classification standard for the susceptibility of geological hazards established in this article has a good application effect, but this standard needs more examples to verify. Geological hazard susceptibility evaluation is based on a good factor classification. Research work needs not only to focus on scientific and advanced evaluation methods, but also basic research on how to select factors and rational classification of factors.

Establishment of Integrated Classification of Natural Disaster Risk in China

Spatially Resolved Risk Assessment of Environmental Incidents in China

Ecological Risk Assessment of Natural Disasters in China

Integrated Regional Ecological Risk Assessment of Multi-Ecosystems under Multi-Disasters: a Case Study of China

Regional Disaster Risk Evaluation of China Based on the Universal Risk Model

Natural Disaster Risk and Chinese Emergency Management System

Research of the Natural Disaster Risk on Coastal Cities

Flood Vulnerability and Risk in Coastal Regions of China

Environmental risk source and its classification

An Analysis on Disasters Management System in China

Comparative Analysis on Classification Methods of Geological Disaster Susceptibility Assessment

Risk assessment and regionalization of natural disaster of corn in China based on GIS

Classification and Assessment of Natural Disasters' Loss in Coastal Cities

An integrated risk assessment framework for multiple natural disasters based on multi-dimensional correlation analysis

Risk Assessment And Comparison Of Regional Natural Disasters In China Using Clustering

Natural Disaster Risk Management Based on Acceptable Risk

Study on Human Factors of Risk Management for Natural Disasters

Large-scale assessment of landslide hazard, vulnerability and risk in China

Risk identification of typhoon induced storm tide in China

Types of Coastal Disasters in China and Design of Coastal Disasters Information System

Methodology for the assessment and classification of regional vulnerability to natural hazards in China: the application of a DEA model