67MO Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Toripalimab in High-Risk Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II Trial

H. Mai,S-L. Liu,J.H. Yang,D.X. Wen,S-S. Guo,L. Liu,M-J. Luo,Y-J. Liang,X-S. Sun,X-Y. Li,L. Donghua,J-B. Li,P. Wang,L. Guo,H-Y. Mo,R. Sun,C. Zhao,R-H. Xu,Q.Y. Chen,L.Q. Tang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotech.2023.100539
2023-01-01
Immuno-Oncology and Technology
Abstract:Patients (pts) with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) with high pretreatment plasma Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) DNA remain at high risk for recurrence after platinum-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy(CCRT). The purpose of this single-center, randomized, double-blind, phase 2 study is to compare the efficacy and safety of toripalimab (anti-PD-1) and CCRT versus placebo and CCRT in pts with high-risk LA-NPC. Pts with initially diagnosed stage III- IVA nasopharyngeal carcinoma ( pretreatment plasma EBV DNA ≥1500 copies/ml) were randomized 2:1 to receive neoadjuvant toripalimab (240 mg) or placebo once every 2 weeks for 2 cycles, followed by CCRT and adjuvant toripalimab (240 mg) or placebo once every 3 weeks for up to 8 cycles. The primary endpoint was 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate according to the investigator's assessment in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS), major pathological response (MPR) in nasopharynx biospy, overall response (ORR), quality-of-Life and safety. From December 2019 to December 2021, 150 pts were randomized to the neoadjuvant-adjuvant toripalimab group (n = 100) and the placebo group (n = 50). At a median follow-up of 26.9 months, a statistically significant improvement in 2-year PFS rate by the investigator's assessment in the ITT population was demonstrated for the toripalimab group vs placebo group (91.8% vs 73.9%; HR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.15 - 0.76, P =0.006). The 2-year OS rate was 100% and 94.0% (HR = 0.10, 95% CI: 0.01 - 0.82, P = 0.008), 2-year DMFS and LRFS were 92.8% vs 80.0% and 99.0% vs 82.0%, respectively. No new safety signals were identified, the incidence of grade≥3 treatment-related adverse events were similar between two groups (73.7% vs 68.0%). The addition of neoadjuvant and adjuvant toripalimab to CCRT provided a significant improvement in 2-year PFS rate for the high-risk LA-NPC pts with an acceptable safety profile.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?