573P LUMINATE-103: Real-world Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Patients (pts) with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutant (EGFR MU), Non-Squamous (NSQ) Locally Advanced/metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (a/mnsclc): Pooled Analysis of Large US Electronic Health Record (EHR) Datasets

Byoung Chul Cho,Qingqing Xu,Samson Ng,J.W. Goldman,Nicolas Girard,David Planchard,Shobhit Baijal,Rajesh Kamalakar,Vincent Blot,Hasan Alhasani,Sudeep Karve,Shun Lü
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2023.10.651
IF: 51.769
2023-01-01
Annals of Oncology
Abstract:Several tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting EGFR are approved for first-line (1L) treatment of EGFR MU NSCLC. Most pts progress on 1L EGFR TKIs and, unless they stay on current treatment or switch to other targeted therapy, will advance to receive systemic therapies. This study evaluated real-world treatment patterns and outcomes of pts with EGFR MU NSQ a/mNSCLC. This retrospective observational study used pooled, de-identified EHR-derived data from US nationwide databases Flatiron Health, ConcertAI Patient360, and ConcertAI RWD360nlp. To exclude duplicate EHR, overlap assessment was performed via tokenization. EHR from pts diagnosed with EGFR MU NSQ a/mNSCLC between 2017–2022 who received earlier-line osimertinib (Osi), followed by 2L platinum-based chemotherapy, or 3L docetaxel (Doc) were included. Times from treatment line initiation until death (OS), within-line progression or death (PFS), treatment discontinuation (TTD), and initiation of next line or death (TTNTD) were assessed. Data from 256 pts were included: 227 (89%) in 2L and 29 (11%) in 3L. Median age at 2L/3L start was 67 (33–87) yr, 176 (69%) pts were female, 155 (61%) had ECOG PS of 0–1, and 225 (88%) had stage 3B or 4 NSCLC at diagnosis. Most common treatments were carboplatin + pemetrexed + pembrolizumab (39%) or carboplatin + pemetrexed (28%) in 2L, and Doc + ramucirumab (69%) or Doc mono (31%) in 3L. All 2L and 86% of 3L pts had received 1L Osi alone (2L: 68%; 3L: 52%) or Osi after older-generation EGFR TKI or a few rounds of chemotherapy ± IO (2L: 32%; 3L: 34%). Time-to-event outcomes are shown in the table.Table: 573PReal-world clinical outcomesOutcomeNEventsMedian time to event, months (95% CI)Median follow-up, months2L ptsOS22712315.7 (12.9, 20.2)23.3PFS2091564.9 (4.2, 6.4)24.8TTNTD2271766.1 (5.2, 7.9)26.7TTD2271804.4 (3.5, 5.9)24.03L ptsOS291910.1 (5.2, NE)14.7PFS27214.4 (3.0, 9.8)13.0TTNTD29225.2 (3.5, 10.5)12.7TTD29233.7 (1.6, 9.2)12.72L, second-line; 3L, third-line; CI, confidence interval; NE, not estimable; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; pts, patients; TTD, time to treatment discontinuation; TTNTD, time to next treatment or death. Open table in a new tab 2L, second-line; 3L, third-line; CI, confidence interval; NE, not estimable; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; pts, patients; TTD, time to treatment discontinuation; TTNTD, time to next treatment or death. RWE shows that 2L/3L treatment options for pts with EGFR MU NSQ a/mNSCLC are mostly limited to chemotherapy and are associated with poor outcomes, demonstrating a high unmet need for novel treatments.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?