Impact of Citation Network on the Diffusion of Systems Science Simulation Approaches in Health‐Related Research

Shiyong Liu,Hong Xue,Youfa Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.30.1_supplement.900.5
2016-01-01
The FASEB Journal
Abstract:Background Systems science approaches, especially simulation approaches have been widely adopted by the researchers in health fields to gain better understanding of nonlinearities and dynamics generated by complex and dynamic interplay of many factors from biology to human behaviors and policy interventions. The range of applications includes but are limited to investigate issues of non‐communicable chronic disease (e.g. obesity, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes), contagious diseases (e.g. influenza, tuberculosis, HIV), healthcare management, health policy and system reform. National Institutes of Health (NIH) has actively promoted the use of systems science, predominately system dynamics model (SDM), agent‐based model(ABM), social network analysis (SNA), and discrete event simulation(DES) in health‐related research. Aims This study is to examine how citation network in the publications regarding application of SDM, ABM, SNA and DES to health research affect their diffusion. Methods We have retrieved and analyzed 3912 journal papers (English) regarding application of these four simulation approaches in health‐related research starting from year of 1963 to 2013. In this study, we employed bibliometric analysis and citation network analysis. Results Our results indicate that the order (from the best to the worst) of diffusion status of these simulation approaches is SNA(1963–2013), ABM(1995–2013), DES (1981–2013), and SDM(1972–2013). Our findings suggest that citation network in specific approach is one of the major driving forces for their rapid diffusion in wide areas of health fields. Results also unfold that more subgroups in the citation network effectively help expand the research areas which subsequently facilitate the diffusion of the corresponding simulation approach. Further findings show that high network centrality reinforced by some key subgroups (in certain field) and adopters (authors) does not help advance diffusion of that simulation approach in health‐related research. Conclusions The accelerated increase in the authors, journals, expansion in research area which rapidly boost the growth in the network of citations are jointly driving the fast diffusion of SNA, ABM, DES, and SDM in health research. Even though some challenges exist thus far, interdisciplinary and/or trans‐disciplinary research bring solution to those challenges. Based on our findings in this study, it is optimistic to claim that the diffusion of above‐mentioned systems simulation approaches in health‐related research remain active for next several decades. Support or Funding Information Funding: NIH U54 center grant, HD070725.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?